Selection Signature Mapping Reveals Genomic Regions Shaped by Artificial Selection in Jaunpuri Goats
10 / 6
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Jaunpuri is an important indigenous dairy goat breed of northern India, but the genomic basis of its economically important traits remains poorly understood. This study investigated genome-wide selection signatures using four complementary approaches namely nucleotide diversity (π), Tajima's D, composite likelihood ratio (CLR) and integrated haplotype score (iHS). The π analysis identified 948 candidate genes enriched for transcriptional regulation and chromatin organization. Tajima's D detected 848 candidate genes with similar functional enrichment, whereas the CLR approach identified 6,410 selective sweep regions enriched for axon guidance and cell-adhesion pathways. The iHS analysis highlighted candidate regions containing LDB2 and DCHS2, which overlap reported milk production QTLs, together with haemoglobin-related genes. Fourteen candidate genes consistently identified by π, Tajima's D, iHS and CLR analyses, represent the most robust candidate loci associated with the genetic architecture of the Jaunpuri goat. These genes are known to be involved in mammary gland development, lactation and reproductive biology. Their detection may reflect historical or ongoing selection for enhanced milk production and reproductive performance in Jaunpuri goats.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Andrews S. 2014. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
Chu J, Ma Y, Song H, Zhao Q, Wei X, Yan Y, Fan S, Zhou B, Li S, and Mou C. 2023. The genomic characteristics affect phenotypic diversity from the perspective of genetic improvement of economic traits. iScience, 26:107043. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107043.
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, McVean G, Durbin R, and 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27(15):2156–2158. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330.
Dischinger PS, Tovar EA, Essenburg CJ, Madaj ZB, Gardner EE, Callaghan ME, Turner AN, Challa AK, Kempston T, Eagleson B, Kesterson RA, Bronson RT, Bowman MJ, Graveel CR and Steensma MR. 2018. NF1 deficiency correlates with estrogen receptor signaling and diminished survival in breast cancer. Breast Cancer, 4(1):29. doi:10.1038/s41523-018-0080-8.
Dong C, Ma P, Tang Y, Han H, Chen S, Yang J, Sun Z, Wang W, Yu Y and Li S. 2026. Genetic parameter estimation and fine-mapping of milk-production traits and somatic cell score in Chinese Simmental cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 109(4):4195–4208. doi:10.3168/jds.2025-27039.
Gala K, Li Q, Sinha A, Razavi P, Dorso M, Sanchez-Vega F, Chung YR, Hendrickson R, Hsieh JJ, Berger M, Schultz N, Pastore A, Abdel-Wahab O, and Chandarlapaty S. 2018. KMT2C mediates the estrogen dependence of breast cancer through regulation of ERα enhancer function. Oncogene, 37(34):4692–4710. doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0273-5.
Han Q, Yan X, Ye Y, Han L, Ma X, Wang T, Cao D, and Zhang WJ. 2022. ZBTB20 regulates prolactin expression and lactotrope function in adult mice. Endocrinology, 163(12):bqac181. doi:10.1210/endocr/bqac181.
Lapierre M, Linares A, Dalvai M, Duraffourd C, Bonnet S, Boulahtouf A, Rodriguez C, Jalaguier S, Assou S, Orsetti B, Balaguer P, Maudelonde T, Blache P, Bystricky K, Boulle N, and Cavaillès V. 2016. Histone deacetylase 9 regulates breast cancer cell proliferation and the response to histone deacetylase inhibitors. Oncotarget, 7(15):19693–19708. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7564.
Li H and Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25(14):1754–1760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, and 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25(16):2078–2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.
Li H. 2011. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 27(21):2987–2993. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509.
Mohideen AMSH, Johansen SD, and Babiak I. 2020. High-throughput identification of adapters in single-read sequencing data. Biomolecules, 10:878. doi:10.3390/biom10060878.
Nei M, and Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 76(10):5269–5273. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269.
Oliveros JC. 2007–2015. Venny: An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams.
Patel AK, Singh VK, Singh J, Singh NS, and Verma MK. 2017. Phenotypic characterization of Jaunpuri goat of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Livestock Biodiversity, 7(1).
Sen AR, Santra A, and Karim SA. 2004. Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semi-arid conditions. Meat Science, 66(4):757–763. doi:10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00182-4.
Sherman BT, Hao M, Qiu J, Jiao X, Baseler MW, Lane HC, Imamichi T, and Chang W. 2022. DAVID: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Research, 50(W1):W216–W221. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac194.
Szpiech ZA and Hernandez RD. 2014. Selscan: An efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31(10):2824–2827. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu211.
Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123(3):585–595. doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585.
Verma NK. 2018. Goat genetic diversity of India—An overview. Journal of Livestock Biodiversity, 8(1) :1-10.
Xu SS, Gao L, Xie XL, Ren YL, Shen ZQ, Wang F, Shen M, Eyþórsdóttir E, Hallsson JH, Kiseleva T, Kantanen J, and Li MH. 2018. Genome-wide association analyses highlight the potential for different genetic mechanisms for litter size among sheep breeds. Frontiers in Genetics, 9:118. doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00118
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Livestock Biodiversity

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.