DIFFERENTIAL BEHAVIOR TO DROUGHT OFTWO ELITE POTATO CULTIVARS GROWNIN SOUTHEASTERN PAMPEAN REGION OF ARGENTINAINA
Abstract views: 86
/ 
PDF downloads: 151
Authors
-
Martin Tagliotti
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce
-
Sergio Giuliano
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
-
Marino Puricelli
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce
-
Andrés Zambelli
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
-
Maria Cecilia Bedogni
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce
Keywords:
drought tolerance, Spunta, Newen INTA, drought stress indices, proline contentAbstract
Potatoes production requires large inputs of water for which development of drought tolerant cultivars
is particularly relevant to ensure or even increase its productivity. Two elite cultivars, Newen INTA and Spunta, were
evaluated in the field under contrasting water regimes. After drought treatment, the yield of marketable tubers decreased
53% in Spunta and 22% in Newen INTA while the number of marketable tubers decreased 32% in both cultivars. Yield of
tuber > 90 mm only decreased in Spunta (62.81%, p < 0.05). Newen INTA showed a greater reduction in the shoot and root
dry biomass than Spunta, while the root/shoot ratio was higher in Newen INTA. Proline content increased 61% in both
cultivars under drought treatment. Drought tolerance indices (GMP and DTI) were higher in Newen INTA, and the drought
susceptibility index was higher in Spunta. Proline content was correlated with root dry biomass and the marketable tuber
number in both cultivars. Dry root biomass correlated with the yield of marketable tubers and the number of marketable
tubers. In drought conditions, Newen INTA showed greater tolerance to drought. Therefore, Newen INTA emerges as a
useful genotype to contribute to increasing crop productivity in areas subject to water stress.
Downloads
References
Aliche EB, Oortwijn M, Theeuwen TP, Bachem CW,
van Eck HJ, Visser, RG and van der Linden CG
(2019) Genetic mapping of tuber size distribution
and marketable tuber yield under drought stress
in potatoes. Euphytica 215(11): 1-19
Aliche EB, Oortwijn M, Theeuwen TP, Bachem
CW, Visser RG and van der Linden CG (2018)
Drought response in field grown potatoes and the
interactions between canopy growth and yield.
Agricultural Water Management 206: 20-30
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D and Smith M (2006)
Evapotranspiración del cultivo. Guía para la determinación
de los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos. Estudio
Riego y Drenaje N° 56, FAO, Rome, Italy
Ashraf MFMR and Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine
betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress
resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany
(2): 206-216
Bates LS, Waldren RP and Teare ID (1973) Rapid
determination of free proline for water-stress studies.
Plant and Soil 39(1): 205-207
Bedogni MC, Capezio SB and Echaide G (2018)
Performance of two potato varieties under water
stress. Revista Latinoamericana de la Papa 22(1): 49-57
Boguszewska-Mańkowska D, Zarzyńska K and
Nosalewicz A (2020) Drought differentially affects
root system size and architecture of potato cultivars
with differing drought tolerance. American Journal
of Potato Research 97(1): 54-62
Cabello R, De Mendiburu F, Bonierbale M, Monneveux
P, Roca W and Chujoy E (2012) Large-scale
evaluation of potato improved varieties, genetic
stocks and landraces for drought tolerance.
American Journal of Potato Research 89(5): 400-410
Cabello R, Monneveux P, De Mendiburu F and
Bonierbale M (2013) Comparison of yield based
drought tolerance indices in improved varieties,
genetic stocks and landraces of potato (Solanum
tuberosum L.). Euphytica 193(2): 147-156
Cacace JE, Huarte MA and Monti MC (1994) Evaluation
of potato cooking quality in Argentina. American
Potato Journal 71(3): 145-153
Cantore V, Wassar F, Yamaç SS, Sellami MH, Albrizio
R, Stellacci AM and Todorovic M (2014) Yield and
water use efficiency of early potato grown under
different irrigation regimes. International Journal of
Plant Production 8(3): 409-428
Carillo P and Gibon Y (2011) Protocol: extraction
and determination of proline. PrometheusWiki 1-5.
Available at: http://prometheuswiki.org/tiki-index.
php?page=Extraction+and+determination+of+pro
line
Claussen W (2005) Proline as a measure of stress in
tomato plants. Plant Science 168(1): 241-248
Deblonde PMK and Ledent JF (2000) Effects of moderate
drought conditions on crop growth parameters
and earliness of six potato cultivars under field
conditions. Agronomie 20(6): 595-608
Della Maggiora AI (1996) Estimación de l a
evapotranspiración. Aplicación para la programación
de riego en el cultivo de papa. Facultad de Ciencias
Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata,
Argentina, M.Sc. thesis.
Di-Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L,
Tablada M and Robledo CW (2017) InfoStat versión
(Version 2017) [Computer software]. Infostat
Group, Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, Argentina.
Evers D, Lefevre I, Legay S, Lamoureux D, Hausman
JF, Rosales ROG and Schafleitner R (2010)
Identification of drought-responsive compounds
in potato through a combined transcriptomic and
targeted metabolite approach. Journal of Experimental
Botany 61(9): 2327-2343
FAOSTAT (2023). Food Agriculture and Organization
(FAOSTAT). Available at: http://www.fao.org/
faost at/en/#data/QC. Revised on September
Fischer RA and Maurer R (1978) Drought resistance in
spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29(5):
-912
Fernandez GC (1992) Effective selection criteria for
assessing plant stress tolerance. In, Proceeding of
the International Symposium on Adaptation of
Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature
and Water Stress, Aug. 13-16, Shanhua, Taiwan,
-270
Hassanpanah D (2010) Evaluation of potato cultivars
for resistance against water deficit stress under
in vivo conditions. Potato Research 53(4): 383-392
Hijmans RJ (2003) The effect of climate change on
global potato production. American Journal of Potato
Research 80(4): 271-279
Huarte M and Capezio S (2013). Cultivo de papa. In,
Agricultura y ganadería pampeanas (Spanish). Cahuepé
M and Gutheim F (ed), EUDEM, Mar del Plata,
Argentina: 172-202
Hummel I, Pantin F, Sulpice R, Piques M, Rolland G,
Dauzat M, Christophe A, Pervent M, Bouteillé M,
Stitt M, Gibon Y and Muller B (2010) Arabidopsis
plants acclimate to water deficit at low cost
through changes of carbon usage: an integrated
perspective using growth, metabolite, enzyme, and
gene expression analysis. Plant Physiology 154(1):
-372
Ierna A and Mauromicale G (2006) Physiological and
growth response to moderate water deficit of offseason
potatoes in a Mediterranean environment.
Agricultural Water Management 82(1-2): 193-209
Ierna A and Mauromicale G (2020) How moderate
water stress can affect water use efficiency indices
in potato. Agronomy 10(7): 1034. doi:10.3390/
agronomy10071034
Ierna A, Pandino G, Lombardo S and Mauromicale G
(2011) Tuber yield, water and fertilizer productivity
in early potato as affected by a combination of
irrigation and fertilization. Agricultural Water
Management 101(1): 35-41
Iwama K (2008) Physiology of the potato: new insights
into root system and repercussions for crop
management. Potato Research 51(3): 333-353
Lahlou O and Ledent JF (2005) Root mass and depth,
stolons and roots formed on stolons in four cultivars
of potato under water stress. European Journal of
Agronomy 22(2): 159-173
Levy D, Coleman WK and Veilleux RE (2013) Adaptation
of potato to water shortage: irrigation management
and enhancement of tolerance to drought and
salinity. American Journal of Potato Research 90(2):
-206
MAGYP (2021) Producción de papa en Argentina. Ministry
of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries. Available
at: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/
files/magyp-informe-papa-mayo-2021.pdf
Man-Hong Y, Lei Z, Sheng-Tao X, McLaughlin NB and
Jing-Hui L (2020) Effect of water soluble humic
acid applied to potato foliage on plant growth,
photosynthesis characteristics and fresh tuber yield
under different water deficits. Scientific Reports
(1): 1-10
Mohamed AA, Matter MA and Saker MM (2010)
Effect of salt stress on some defense mechanisms
of transgenic and wild potato clones (Solanum
tuberosum L.) grown in vitro. Nature and Science
(8): 181-193
Monneveux P, Ramírez DA and Pino MT (2013) Drought
tolerance in potato (S. tuberosum L.): Can we learn
from drought tolerance research in cereals? Plant
Science 205: 76-86
Onder S, Caliskan ME, Onder D and Caliskan S (2005)
Different irrigation methods and water stress effects
on potato yield and yield components. Agricultural
Water Management 73(1): 73-86
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for
statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation
for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://
www.R-project.org/
Rai MK, Kalia RK, Singh R, Gangola MP and Dhawan
AK (2011) Developing stress tolerant plants through
in vitro selection—an overview of the recent
progress. Environmental and Experimental Botany
(1): 89-98
Raymond MJ and Smirnoff N (2002) Proline metabolism
and transport in maize seedlings at low water
potential. Annals of Botany 7: 813-823.
Saba J, Moghaddam M, Ghassemi K and Nishabouri
MR (2001). Genetic properties of drought resistance
indices. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology
: 43–49
Saravia D, Farfán-Vignolo ER, Gutiérrez R, De
Mendiburu F, Schafleitner R, Bonierbale M and
Khan MA (2016) Yield and physiological response
of potatoes indicate different strategies to cope with drought stress and nitrogen fertilization. American
Journal of Potato Research 93(3): 288-295
Schafleitner R, Gutierrez R, Espino R, Gaudin A,
Pérez J, Martínez M, Domínguez A, Tincopa L,
Alvarado C, Numberto G and Bonierbale, M
(2007) Field screening for variation of drought
tolerance in Solanum tuberosum L. by agronomical,
physiological and genetic analysis. Potato Research
(1): 71-85
Sharma N, Kumar P, Kadian MS, Pandey SK, Singh
SV and Luthra SK (2011) Performance of potato
(Solanum tuberosum) clones under water stress. The
Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(9): 825-829
Shelden MC, Dias DA, Jayasinghe NS, Bacic A, Roessner
U (2016) Root spatial metabolite profiling of two
genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) reveals
differences in response to short-term salt stress.
Journal of Experimental Botany 67(12): 3731-3745
Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 10th
Edition, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Washington DC
Sprenger H, Erban A, Seddig S, Rudack K, Thalhammer
A, Le MQ, Walther D, Zuther E, Köhl KI, Kopka
J and Hincha DK (2018) Metabolite and transcript
markers for the prediction of potato drought
tolerance. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16(4): 939-950
Szabados L and Savouré A (2010) Proline: a multifunctional
amino acid. Trends in Plant Science 15(2), 89-97
Tagliotti ME, Bedogni MC, Cendoya MG, Ortego J and
Huarte MA (2020) Multitrait differential response
in a diverse potato panel under contrasting water
regimes. Crop Science 60(3): 1267-1280
Verslues PE and Sharp RE (1999) Proline accumulation
in maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots at low water
potentials. II. Metabolic source of increased proline
deposition in the elongation zone. Plant Physiology
: 1349-1360
Wang FX, Kang Y and Liu SP (2006) Effects of drip
irrigation frequency on soil wetting pattern and
potato growth in North China Plain. Agricultural
Water Management 79(3): 248-264
Wang Z, Yang Y, Yadav V, Zhao W, He Y, Zhang X and
Wei C (2022) Drought-induced proline is mainly
synthesized in leaves and transported to roots in
watermelon under water deficit. Horticultural Plant
Journal 8(5): 615-626
Zarzynska K, Boguszewska-Mańkowska D and
Nosalewicz A (2017) Differences in size and
architecture of the potato cultivars root system
and their tolerance to drought stress. Plant, Soil and
Environment 63(4): 159-164
Zhang SH, Xu XF, Sun YM, Zhang JL and Li CZ (2018)
Influence of drought hardening on the resistance
physiology of potato seedlings under drought
stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(2): 336-347
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Potato Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in Potato Journal is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
