Characterizing waterlogging tolerance using multiple selection indices in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum)


351 / 211

Authors

  • GYANENDRA SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • PRADEEP KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • VIKAS GUPTA ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • B S TYAGI ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • CHARAN SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • A K SHARMA ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India
  • G P SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101512

Keywords:

ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, Haryana 132 001, India

Abstract

WL stress significantly affected grain yield, biological yield, tillers per meter, plant height and spike weight. The plant height, tillers per meter, spike weight, and biological yield were found to be positively and significantly correlated with grain yield under WL conditions. Among these traits, biological yield has maximum contribution towards WL tolerance and can be used for selection of tolerant genotypes. Significant and desirable correlation of different selection indices, viz. HM, MP, YSI, STI and PRGY indicated that any one of these can be used interchangeably to select stress tolerant genotypes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arguello M N, Esten-Mason R, Trenton L R, Nithya-Subramanian, Andrea-Acuna, Christopher K A, Dennism N L, Randallm G M and Edward-Gbur. 2016. Performance of soft red winter wheat subjected to field soil waterlogging: Grain yield and yield components. Field Crops Research 194: 57–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.040

Bouslama M and Schapaugh W T. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science 24: 933–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x

Choukan R, Taherkhani T, Ghannadha M R and Khodarahm I M. 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance in grain maize inbred lines using drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 8: 79–89.

Dickin E and Wright D. 2008. The effects of winter waterlogging and summer drought on the growth and yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). European Journal of Agronomy 28: 234–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.010

Fernandez G C J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. (In) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, AVRDC Publication, Tainan, August 13-16, pp. 257–70.

Hossain A B S, Sears A G, Cox T S and Paulsen G M. 1990. Desiccation tolerance and its relationship to assimilate partitioning in winter wheat. Crop Science 30: 622–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030030x

Kristin A S, Serna R R, Perez F I, Enriquez B C, Gallegos J A A, Vallego P R, Wassimi N and Kelly J D. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science 37: 43–50. Powell N, Ji X, Ravash R, Edlington J and Dolferus R. 2012. Yield stability for cereals in a changing climate. Functional Plant Biology 39: 539–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12078

Rasaei A, Ghobadi M E, Jalali-Honarmand S, Ghobadi M and Saeidi M. 2012. Impacts of waterlogging on shoot apex development and recovery effects of nitrogen on grain yield of wheat. European Journal of Experimental Biology 2: 8.

Setter T L, Waters I, Sharma S K, Singh K N, Kulshreshtha N, Yaduvanshi N P S, Ram P C, Singh B N, Rane J, McDonald G, Khabaz-Saberi H, Biddulph T B, Wilson R, Barclay I, McLean R and Cakir M. 2009. Review of wheat improvement for waterlogging tolerance in Australia and India: the importance of anaerobiosis and element toxicities associated with different soils. Annals of Botany 103: 221–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn137

Shao G C, Lan J J, Yu S E, Liu N, Guo R Q and She D L. 2013. Photosynthesis andgrowth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages. Photosynthetica 51: 429–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0039-9

Singh G, Kumar P, Gupta V, Tyagi B S, Singh C, Sharma A K and Singh G P. 2018a. Multivariate approach to identify and characterize bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) germplasm for waterlogging tolerance in India. Field Crops Research 221: 81–9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.019

Singh G, Setter T L, Singh M K, Kulshreshtha N, Singh B N, Stefanova K, Tyagi B S, Singh J B, Kherawat B S and Barrett- Lennard EG. 2018b. Number of tillers in wheat is an easily measurable index of genotype tolerance to saline waterlogged soils: evidence from 10 large-scale field trials in India. Crop and Pasture Science 69: 561–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18053

Downloads

Submitted

2020-06-22

Published

2020-06-22

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SINGH, G., KUMAR, P., GUPTA, V., TYAGI, B. S., SINGH, C., SHARMA, A. K., & SINGH, G. P. (2020). Characterizing waterlogging tolerance using multiple selection indices in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(3), 662-665. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i3.101512
Citation