Nitrogen and residue management effects on performance of happy seeder sown wheat


966 / 232

Authors

  • AMANDEEP SINGH SIDHU Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • J S KANG Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • JAGROOP KAUR Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114240

Keywords:

Chopping of straw, Nitrogen, Residue management, Root density, Soil health

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2016-17 and 2017-18 to evaluate the influence of different residue and nitrogen management practices on soil physico-chemical properties, root density, weed growth and grain yield of happy seeder sown wheat. Experiment was conducted in randomized block design consisting of eleven residue and nitrogen management treatments in four replications. The results inferred that weed biomass was significantly less in chopped straw treatments (C) as compared to unchopped treatments (NC). Treatments receiving 150 kg N/ha had higher root density than 125 kg N/ha treatments at all soil depths during both years. Soil physical and chemical properties were not significantly affected but there was improvement in these properties after two years of residue retention. Grain yield (5.42 and 5.36 t/ha) was maximum in treatment where 150 kg N (30 kg at chopping of straw and 120 kg as per recommendation) was applied along with 5 t/ha FYM (C+N30+120+FYM5), which was significantly better than NC + N125, C + N125, C + FYM5 + N125 and C + N20+105 treatments but statistically at par with rest of the treatments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam M K, Islam M M, Salahin N and Hasanuzzaman M. 2014. Effect of tillage practices on soil properties and crop productivity in wheat-mungbean-rice cropping system under subtropical climatic conditions. Scientific World Journal (15 pp).

Blake G R.1965. Bulk density. (In) Methods of Soil Analysis Part I. Physical and Mineralogical properties. Black C A, Evans D D, White J L, Ensminger L E and Clark F E (Eds), American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Chakraborty D, Garg R N, Tomar R K, Singh R, Sharma S K, Singh R K, Trivedi S M, Mittal R B, Sharma P K and Kamble K H. 2010. Synthetic and organic mulching and nitrogen effect on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment. Agriculture Water Management 97: 738–48.

Chaudhary A, Meena M C, Parihar C M and Dey A. 2017. Effect of long-term conservation agriculture on soil organic carbon and dehydrogenase activity under maize-based cropping systems. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(10): 437–44.

Cochran W G and Cox G M. 1967. Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, New Delhi, India.

Ella V B, Reyes M R, Mercado A, Adrian A and Padre R. 2016. Conservation agriculture increases soil organic carbon and residual water content in upland crop production systems. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 5(1): 24–29.

Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Van Kessel C and Six J. 2009. Managing N availability and losses by combining fertilizer-N with different quality residues in Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 131(3&4): 308–14.

Jackson M L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis, pp 234-46. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.

Kaur J. 2016. ‘Productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in relation to sowing methods, mulching and schedules of irrigation’. Ph D dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Kesarwani A, Shukla R, Singh V P, Pandey D S, Pramanick B, Yadav S K and Rani M. 2017. In-situ rice residue management under rice-wheat cropping system and their influence on wheat productivity. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6: 1422–25.

Kumar V. 2017. ‘Influence of seed rates, rice residue and weed management on weed dynamics, herbicide efficacy and wheat productivity’. Ph D thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India.

Mal T. 2017. ‘Productivity of maize-based cropping systems in relation to tillage, mulching and fertilizer management practices’. Ph D thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Manzoni S, Jackson R B, Trofymow J A and Porporato A. 2008. The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science 321: 684–86.

Meena J R, Behera U K, Chakraborty D and Sharma A R. 2015. Tillage and residue management effect on soil properties, crop performance and energy relations in greengram (Vigna radiata L.) under maize-based cropping systems. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 3(4): 261–72.

Olsen S R, Cole C V, Waternade F S and Dean L A.1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939: 1–9.

Reynolds W D, Elrick D E and Youngs E G. 2002. Single-ring and double or concentric-ring infiltrometers. (In) Methods of Soil Analysis, p 8. Dane J H and Topp G C (Eds). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.

Subbiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–60.

Tripathi S C, Chander S and Meena R P. 2015. Effect of residue retention, tillage options and timing of N application in rice-wheat cropping system. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 13(1): 37–49.

Walkley A and Black C A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 27–38.

Yadvinder-Singh, Gupta R K, Gurpreet-Singh, Jagmohan-Singh, Sidhu H S and Bijay-Singh. 2009. Nitrogen and residue management effects on agronomic productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in rice-wheat system in Indian Punjab. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 84(2): 141–54.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-23

Published

2021-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SIDHU, A. S., KANG, J. S., & KAUR, J. (2021). Nitrogen and residue management effects on performance of happy seeder sown wheat. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(6), 814–818. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114240
Citation