Effect of age and number of seedlings on rice (Oryza sativa) under SRI in rainfed agro-ecosystem


458 / 308

Authors

  • ADIKANT PRADHAN S G College of Agriculture and Research Station, IGKV, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 494 001, India
  • ANIL DIXIT ICAR- National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, Chhattisgarh

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114286

Keywords:

Seedling age, Seedlings quantity, System of Rice Intensification, Number of seedlings

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during the kharif 2018-19 at S G College of Agriculture and Research Station, Jagdalpur to evaluate the effect of number of seedlings/hill and their age on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under SRI. The 12 treatments combinations of 1, 2 and 3 seedlings/hill, transplanted at an age of 10, 20, 30 and 40 days were laid out in RBD with 3 replications. The seedlings were transplanted in a square pattern at 25cmx25cm spacing. The crop was weeded by cono-weeder twice. The results showed that transplanting 1 and 2 seedlings attained similar growth, yield attributes and yields being significantly higher than 3 seedlings/hill and 7% yield advancement was obtained with transplanting 1 or 2 seedlings/hill over 3 seedlings/hill. Among the seedling ages 10 and 20 days old seedlings resulted in significantly higher growth, yield attributes and yield than 30 and 40 days old seedlings. Twenty one days old seedlings are more easy to handle and produced grain yield as much as 14 days old seedlings, but increased 5.8% and 13.9% more grain yield than 28 and 35 days old seedlings, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barion J. 2002. ‘Nutrient use efficiency and nutrient uptake in conventional and intensive (SRI) rice cultivation systems in Madagascar’. Master thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, p 1-99.

Bouman B A M, Peng S, Castan A R and Visperas R M. 2005. Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agricultural Water Management 74: 87–105.

Bruderie K, Shambu P and Roy S. 2009. Vulnerability reduction and adaptation experiences from Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh: The system of rice intensification, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Vulnerability and Assessment Programme, India, pp 1–35.

Hussain A, Bhat M A, Ganai M A and Hussain T. 2009.Comparative performance of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and conventional methods of rice cultivation under Kashmir valley conditions. Environment and Ecology 27(1A): 399–402.

Krishna A and Biradarpatil N K. 2009. Influence of seedling age and spacing on seed yield and quality of short duration rice under system of rice intensification cultivation. Kamataka Journal of Agricultural Science 22(1): 53–55.

Pasuquin E, Lafarge T and Tubana B. 2008. Transplanting young seedlings in irrigated rice fields: Early and high tiller production and enhanced grain yield. Field Crops Research 105: 141–55.

Prasad R. 2011. Aerobic rice systems. Advances in Agronomy 111:207-247

Thiyagarajan T M, Velu V, Ramasamy S, Durgadevi D, Govindaranjan K, Pryadarshini R, Sudhalakshmi C, Senthil Kumar K, Nisha P T, Gayathry G, Hengsdijk H and Bindrahan P S. 2002. Systems of rice intensification (SRI): Evaluation of seedling age and selected components in Indonesia. (In) Water-wise Rice Production. IRRI, Philippines, pp. 119–27.

WWF-ICRISAT Project. 2010. More rice for people, more water for the planet. African Oxfam America, WWF-ICRISAT Project, Hyderabad, India

Pradhan A, Thakur A and Sonboir H L. 2014. Response of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to different levels of nitrogen under rainfed aerobic ecosystem. Indian Journal of Agronomy 59(1): 76–79.

Barah B C. 2009. Economic and Ecological Benefits of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review 22: 209–14.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-24

Published

2021-08-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PRADHAN, A., & DIXIT, A. (2021). Effect of age and number of seedlings on rice (Oryza sativa) under SRI in rainfed agro-ecosystem. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 91(6), 857–860. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114286
Citation