Effect of spacing and pruning on growth, yield and economics of long melon (Cucumis melo var. utilissimus) under naturally ventilated polyhouse

AWANI KUMAR SINGH; NAVED SABIR; GOGRAJ SINGH JAT; JOGENDRA SINGH; VEERPAL SINGH; AJEET SINGH; ANIL KUMAR; JUGENDRA KUMAR

doi:10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114293

Authors

AWANI KUMAR SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
NAVED SABIR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
GOGRAJ SINGH JAT ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
JOGENDRA SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
VEERPAL SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
AJEET SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
ANIL KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
JUGENDRA KUMAR ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114293

Keywords:

Long melon, Plant spacing, Protected structure, Polyhouse, Pruning methods

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted in naturally ventilated polyhouse structure at CPCT, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi for off-season cultivation of long melon (Cucumis melo var. utilissimus) during 2016 and 2017 under five plant spacing and five branch pruning methods. Plant spacing and pruning methods revealed significant positive influence on yield and net return. Fruit yield decreased with increasing plant spacing and it was found maximum in closer spacing of 50 cm × 20 cm. The net return and B:C ratio also followed similar trends. Among different pruning methods, node branch pruning method (P3) gave highest yield (76.35 q/1000m2) with maximum net return of ₹ 81020/1000m2 and BC ratio 1:1.36 compared to other pruning intensity or no pruning (control). Pruning method involving three nodes per branch was statistically at par in net return and BC ratio with two-nodes per branch method. Study showed that off-season cultivation of long melon under polyhouse structure is a good option to farmers for generating more income and employment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coggins Jr C W and Lovatt C J. 2014. Plant growth regulators. (In) Ferguson L, Grafton-Cardwell EE (Eds). Citruce Production Manual. Uc ANR California.

Ekwu L G, Nwokwu G N and Utobo E B. 2012. Effect of mulching materials and pruning on growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L). International Journal of Agriculture and Rural development 15(2): 1014–21.

Jat G S, Singh B, Tomar B S, Muthukumar P and Kumar M. 2017. Hybrid seed production of bitter gourd is a remunerative venture. Indian Horticulture : 34–37.

Jat G S. 2011. ‘Studies on hybrid seed production in bitter gourd under insect-proof net house and open-field conditions’. M Sc thesis, PG School, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi.

Jat G S, Singh B, Tomar B S, Singh J, Ram H and Kumar M. 2016. Seed yield and quality as influenced by growing conditions in hybrid seed production of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) cv. Pusa Hybrid-1. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 8 (4): 2111–15.

Jat, G S, Singh B, Tomar B S and Ram H. 2015. Comparative performance of growth, flowering behaviour and fruit development traits in parental lines of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) cv. Pusa Hybrid-1. Seed Research 42(2): 139–45.

Maragal S Y, Singh A K, Behera T K, Munsi A D and Sabir N. 2018. Influence of planting time and fertilizer application on fruits yield and quality of bittergourd (Momordica charantia) (var. Pusa Rasdar) for off-season production under protected condition. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(11): 153–55.

Mardhiana, Ankardiansyah P P, Muh A, Kartina, Dwisantoso, Bizza W and Anasmaliki. 2017. Effect of pruning on growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Mercy variety in the acid soil of North Kailimantan, Indesia. Cell Biology and Development 1(1):13–17

Mohamed H M. 2001. Effect of density and different pruning systems on earliness and yield of muskmelon grown in cold plastic house. Egyptian Journal of horticulture in cold plastic house. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture 28(2): 207–16.

Oga I O and Umekwe P N. 2016. Effect of pruning and plant spacing on the growth and yield of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) in Unawana-Afikpo. International Journal of Science and Research. 5(4): 110–15.

Singh A K, Chandra P and Shrivastava R. 2005. Study of different variety and spacing on yield and economics of off-season cucumber production under protected condition in north Indian plains. National Seminar on cucurbits, GBPUA&T, Pantnagar, September-22-23. pp.86.

Singh A K, Chandra P, Shrivastava R and Kumar R. 2015. Influence of varieties and spacing on yield and economics during off-season cucumber production under protected condition in North Indian plains. Vegetable Science 42 (2): 71–75.

Singh A K, Shri Dhar, Munsi A D, Singh V, Kumar M and Sellam P. 2016. Influence of gynoecious cucumber varieties and spacing on yield and economics during off-season production under protected condition in North Indian plains. International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research 14(1): 54–58.

Singh A K, Singh A K, Gupta M J and Shrivastava R. 2003. Effect of polyhouse on insect pest incidence, fruit quality and production of vegetable and fruit crops. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Frontier areas of Entomological Research at IARI, New Delhi: 123-30.

Singh M C, Singh J P, Pandey S K, Mahay D and Shrivastva V. 2017. Factor affecting the performance of greenhouse cucumber cultivation-A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 6 (10): 2304–23.

Utobo E B, Ekwu L G, Ogah E O and Nwokwu G N. 2010. Growth and yield of cucumber varieties as influence by pruning at Abakaliki Agricultural area, Southern Nigeria. Continental Journal of Agronomy 4: 23–27.

Yu K, Fan Q, Wang Y, Wei J, Ma Q, Yu D and Li J. 2013. Function of leafy sepals in Paris polyphylla: Photosynthate allocation and partitioning to the fruit and rhizome. Functional Plant Biology 40(4): 392–99.