Growth and productivity of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus) cultivars under diverse sowing environments


735 / 592

Authors

  • RAKSHIT BHAGAT Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu 180 009, India
  • MAHENDER SINGH Shere- Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology- Jammu, Chatha, Jammu and Kashmir
  • B C SHARMA Shere- Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology- Jammu, Chatha, Jammu and Kashmir

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i10.122648

Keywords:

Cultivars, Gobhi sarson, Growth, Sowing environments, Yield

Abstract

The sowing date of oilseed [winter (rabi) season] crop changes from year to year based on the harvesting of the preceding sown (rainy (kharif) season) crop in the northern regions of India, which exposes the crop to varying weather situations. So, to investigate the impact of sowing environments on growth, yield attributes and yield of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus L.) cultivars, an experiment was conducted with the 3 sowing environments and 3 cultivars under sub-tropical conditions of Jammu during the winter (rabi) season of 2018–19 and 2019–20. The pooled data of two years revealed that the early sown gobhi sarson crop recorded significantly highest growth parameters (plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation) and yield attributes (number of primary and secondary branches/plant, siliquae/ plant and seeds/siliqua) as compared to the delayed sown crop. With the result (source sink relationship), significantly higher seed yield was recorded under the first sowing environment (1758 kg/ha) sown crop, while significant reduction to the extent of 27.66% and 66.95% was recorded with delayed sowing, D2 (1377 kg/ha) and D3 (1053 kg/ha), respectively. The cultivar GSL-1 recorded significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter, primary and secondary branches/plant, siliquae/plant, seeds/silique, followed by ONK-1 and DGS-1, resulting in significantly higher yield of GSL-1 (1493 kg/ha) over DGS-1 (1262 kg/ha) but at par with ONK-1 (1432 kg/ha).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajrawat B, Parmar M and Jamwal M. 2013. Impact of front-line demonstration of oilseed crops in improved technology transfer. Journal of Oilseed Brassica 4(2): 96–97.

Anonymous. 2021. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India.

Anonymous. 2022. Annual report, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi. pp. 68.

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, India.

Keerthi P, Pannu R K and Dhaka A K. 2017. Effect of sowing dates and nitrogen levels on total dry matter and its partitioning at different growth stages and yield of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Agricultural Science Digest 37(1): 27–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/asd.v0iOF.7336

Khajuria S, Dwivedi M C, Kumar S, Kachroo D and Puniya R. 2017. Yield performance and nutrient uptake of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) varieties under different dates of sowing and planting geometry. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 15(1): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2017/32239

Kumar Y, Singh R, Kumar A and Dhaka A K. 2017. Effect of growth and yield parameters on Indian-Mustard genotypes under varying environmental conditions in western Haryana. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 9(4): 2093–3000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i4.1493

Kumari A, Singh R P and Yeshpal. 2012. Productivity and nutrient uptake and economics of Mustard hybrid (Brassica juncea L) under different planting time and row spacing. Indian journal of Agronomy 57(1): 61–67.

Meena M, Meena P K P and Kumhar B L. 2017. Studies on response of mustard varieties to different sowing dates under humid southern plain zone of Rajasthan. International Journals of Pure Applied Biosciences 5(3): 385–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.4024

Meena R K, Meena B L and Meena M L. 2021. Sowing time and crop geometry influences seed yield attributes and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under irrigated conditions of Rajasthan. Journal of Oilseed Brassica 12(2): 123–26.

Nichiporovich A A. 1967. Aims of research on photosynthesis of plants as a factor of soil productivity. Photosynthesis of Productive System, pp. 3–36. Nichiporovich A A (Eds.) Programme Science Trans Jerusalem, Israel.

Olsen S R, Sole C V, Wantnabe F S and Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circulation 939: 19.

Piper C S. 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis (Asian edition), Hans Publishers, Bombay, India.

Sharma R, Kumar D S, Brar A S and Singh S. 2021. Phenological behaviour of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus L.) and thermal indices as influenced by drip irrigation and fertigation schedules under semi-arid subtropical conditions of Punjab. Journal of Agrometeorology 23(4): 416–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v23i4.146

Singh A P, Kumar P, Kumar M, Mamta and Elamathi S. 2015. Economics and quality parameters of toria varieties as influenced by sowing dates and sulphur levels. Plant Archives 15(2): 1021–24.

Subbiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Sciences 25: 259–60.

Walkey A J and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Watson D J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in leaf area between species and varieties and within and between years. Annals of Botany 11(1): 41–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083148

Downloads

Submitted

2022-03-26

Published

2022-10-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BHAGAT, R., SINGH, M., & SHARMA, B. C. (2022). Growth and productivity of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus) cultivars under diverse sowing environments. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 92(10), 1202–1207. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i10.122648
Citation