Response of citrus (Citrus sps.) rootstock hybrids to PEG induced drought under hydroponic system

D M KADAM; A K DUBEY; R M SHARMA; AMRUT MORADE; NIMISHA SHARMA; C BHARDWAJ

doi:10.56093/ijas.v92i10.125062

Authors

D M KADAM ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
A K DUBEY ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
R M SHARMA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
AMRUT MORADE ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
NIMISHA SHARMA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
C BHARDWAJ ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i10.125062

Keywords:

Drought physiology, Hydroponic, Root architecture, Rootstock, Root traits

Abstract

Present study was carried out at the glasshouse facility of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during 2020–21 using a simple hydroponic platform to assess the polyethylene glycol (PEG) induced drought impact on shoot-root morphology and physio-biochemical traits of 4 newly developed citrus (Citrus sps.) rootstock hybrids. Hybrid CRH 21-13/14 displayed superior shoot morphological performance in drought, articulated in terms of increment in plant height (4.5%), leaf numbers (9.5%), and dry weight of shoot (7.0%) with the lowest leaf wilting index (LWI). A contrasting pattern was noticed in CRH 23-5/15, CRH 23-9/17 akin to sensitive check Jatti khatti. Hybrid CRH 21-13/14 exhibited extensively, ramified and improved root system, and was able to sustain root growth under drought. It also showed an increment in root tips (116.1%) and forks (12.6%) during drought, whereas the rest hybrids along with sensitive check (Jatti khatti) exhibited a declining trend. The strong positive association of most root traits with relative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI) underscored the contribution of root traits towards drought avoidance by optimizing water resources. Although all tested hybrids declined total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a/b ratio and CSI (chlorophyll stability index) to varying degrees during drought, CRH 21- 13/14 exhibited minimum decline. Study postulate superior drought tolerance of CRH 21-13/14 conferred by the drought avoidance mechanism and moderate performance of CRH 21-14/14 (Pummelo × Troyer) as against CRH 23-5/15 and CRH 23-9/17 (Pummelo × Morton hybrids).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bajji M, Kinet J M and Lutts S. 2002. The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regulation 36: 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014732714549

Barnes J D, Balaguer L, Manrique E and Davison A W. 1992. A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32: 85–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(92)90034-Y

Barrs H D and Weatherley P E. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15: 413–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413

Bates L S, Waldren R P and Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Becker S R, Byrne P F, McKay J K and Haley S D. 2016. Root traits contributing to drought tolerance of synthetic hexaploid wheat in a greenhouse study. Euphytica 207: 213–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1574-1

Dubey A K and Sharma R M. 2016. Effect of rootstocks on tree growth, yield, quality and leaf mineral composition of lemon (Citrus limon (L.) Burm.). Scientia Horticulturae 200: 131–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.013

Engelbrecht B M, Tyree M T and Kursar T A. 2007. Visual assessment of wilting as a measure of leaf water potential and seedling drought survival. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23: 497–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740700421X

FAOSTAT. 2019. Faostat: Food and Agriculture Data. Rome: FAOSTAT. Accessed 04 Jan 2022

Khoe L T, Dubey A K, Sharma R M, Awasthi O P and Mishra A K. 2020. Citrus rootstock genotypes response to drought: Alternation in morphology, physiology and leaf mineral content. Indian Journal of Horticulture 77: 237–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2020.00032.8

Kulkarni M and Phalke S. 2009. Evaluating variability of root size system and its constitutive traits in hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) under water stress. Scientia Horticulturae 120: 159–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.10.007

Murphy K. 1962. Modifications of the technique for determination of chlorophyll stability index in relation to studies of drought resistance in rice. Current Science 31: 470–71.

Pedroso F K, Prudente D A, Machado E C and Ribeiro R V. 2014. Drought tolerance in citrus trees is enhanced by rootstock-dependent changes in root growth and carbohydrate availability. Environmental and Experimental Botany 101: 26–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.12.024

Rodriguez-Gamir J, Primo-Millo E, Forner J B and Forner-Giner M A. 2010. Citrus rootstock responses to water stress. Scientia Horticulturae 126(2): 95–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.015

Santana-Vieira D D S, Freschi L, de Moraes D M and da Silva Gesteira A. 2016. Survival strategies of citrus rootstocks subjected to drought. Scientific Reports 6(1): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38775

Wijewardana C, Reddy K R and Bellaloui N. 2019. Soybean seed physiology, quality, and chemical composition under soil moisture stress. Food Chemistry 278(2019): 92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.035

Zaher-Ara T, Boroomand N and Sadat-Hosseini M. 2016. Physiological and morphological response to drought stress in seedlings of ten citrus. Trees 30(3): 985–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1372-y