Root and shoot studies of summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and baby corn (Zea mays) under intercropping system with different levels of fertility and stress-mitigating chemicals


476 / 461

Authors

  • ANJU BIJARNIA Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan
  • J P TETARWAL Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan
  • ARJUN LAL BIJARNIA Agriculture University, Mandore, Jodhpur, Rajasthan

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.132997

Keywords:

Cowpea-baby corn intercropping system, Fertilization, Foliar spray, Root to shoot ratio

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during summer seasons of 2019 and 2020 at College of Agriculture (Agriculture University, Kota), Ummedganj, Rajasthan, to study the root and shoot of summer cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] and baby corn (Zea mays L.) under intercropping system with different levels of fertility and stress-mitigating chemicals. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design with 4 replications having 30 treatment combinations with 5 intercropping systems [sole cowpea; sole baby corn; cowpea + baby corn (2:1); cowpea + baby corn (3:1); and cowpea + baby corn (4:1)] in the main plot and 3 fertility levels, viz. 100; 125; and 150% RDF (Recommended dose of fertilizer) in subplot and 2 stress mitigating chemicals (0.5% CaCl2 and 1% KNO3 at flowering and pod development stage of cowpea) in sub-sub plot. Results revealed significant increase in shoot weight, root weight, root-to-shoot ratio, cowpea equivalent yield (CEY) and number and dry weight of nodules in 2:1 row cowpea + baby corn intercropping system over other row ratios. The 2:1 row ratio significantly increased root:shoot ratio of cowpea by 20.9, 15.2, and 7.3% over sole cowpea, 4:1 and 3:1 row ratio, respectively, and resulted in the highest root-to-shoot ratio for baby corn, recording 18.3, 14.5, and 6.8% increase over sole baby corn, 4:1, and 3:1 row ratios of cowpea and baby corn, respectively. Further shoot weight, root weight, root:shoot ratio in cowpea and baby corn, CEY and the number and dry weight of nodules in cowpea exhibited a notable increase in 150% RDF as compared to lower fertility levels (100 and 125% RDF). Applying 150% RDF resulted in a significantly higher root:shoot ratio for both cowpea and baby corn, with increases of 11.3 and 4.5% over 100 and 125% RDF for cowpea, and 11.6 and 5.5% over 100 and 125% RDF for baby corn, respectively. Foliar application of 0.5% CaCl2 at the flowering and pod-developing stages significantly augmented all the aforementioned parameters for both cowpea and baby corn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali M, Ali A and Yaseen M. 2012. Growth and yield response of hybrid maize through integrated phosphorus management. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 10: 59–66. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=PK2013000313 Ayele M. 2020. Evaluation of the effect of maize-legume intercropping on soil moisture improvement in arid area of Bena-Tsemay district, south Omo zone of southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Research and Innovation Technology 10(1): 80–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v10i1.48097

Balai R C, Meena L R and Sharma S C. 2017. Effect of different level of nitrogen and phosphorus on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) under rainfed condition of Rajasthan. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology 3: 19–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53911/JAE.2017.3103

Banik P and Sharma R C. 2009. Yield and resource utilization efficiency in baby corn-legume intercropping system in the eastern plateau of India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 33: 379–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10440040902834970

Choudhary G L and Yadav L R. 2011. Effect of fertility levels and foliar nutrition on cowpea productivity. Journal of Food Legume 24(1): 67–68.

Cun Z X, Chen J B, Xiu X H and Tang D S. 2014. The influence of intercrop mode and planting density on faba bean nodulation and plant growth. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University 29: 514–20.

Dahmardeh M, Ghanbari A, Syasar B and Ramrodi M. 2009. Intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) as a whole-crop forage. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 7(2): 505–09.

Daramy M A, Addo J S and Dumbuya G. 2017. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application on growth and yield performance of cowpea in Ghana. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 5(1): 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18006/2017.5(1).038.044

Das S, Devi K N, Athokpam H S, Lhungdim J and Longjam M. 2017. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) based intercropping system with rapeseed (Brassica juncea L.) on growth, yield and competition indices. Environment and Ecology 35(1B): 427–30.

Devi M T and Singh V K. 2018. Productivity of field pea (Pisum sativum) and baby corn (Zea mays) intercropping systems as affected by planting pattern and weed management. Indian Journal Agronomy 63: 157–62.

Iqbala S, Akhtar J, Naz T, Riaz U, Hussain S, Mazhar Z and Iqbal M M. 2020. Root morphological adjustments of crops to improve nutrient use efficiency in limited environments. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 51: 2452–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1836199

Keshwa G L, Yadav L R and Verma K. 2009. Response of cowpea to phosphorus and biofertilizers. (In) International Conference on Grain Legumes: Quality Improvement, Value Addition and Trade, 14–16 February, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh.

Kumar B, Singh Y, Ram H and Sarlach R S. 2013. Enhancing seed yield and quality of Eyptian clover (Trifloium alexandrinum L.) with foliar application of bio-regulators. Field Crops Research 146: 25–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.004

Kumar R, Bohara J S, Singh A K and Kumawat N. 2015. Productivity, profitability and nutrient use efficiency by corn (Zea mays) as influenced of varying fertility. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60(2): 285–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i2.4451

Liu Y C, Qin X M, Xiao J X, Tang L, Wei C Z, Wei J J and Zheng Y. 2017. Intercropping influences component and content change of flavonoids in root exudates and nodulation in faba bean. Journal of Plant Interaction 12(1): 187–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1308569

Mndzebele B, Ncube B, Fessehazian M, Mobhavdhi T, Amoo S, Pboy C, Venter S and Modi A. 2020. Effect of cowpea- amaranthus intercropping and fertilizer application on soil phosphate activity, available soil phosphorus and crop growth response. Agronomy 10: 79–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010079

Naeem M, Naeem M S, Ahmad R and Ahmad R. 2017. Foliar applied calcium induces drought stress tolerance in maize by manipulating osmolyte accumulation and antioxidative responses. Pakistan Journal of Botany 49(2): 427–34.

Prasad R. 2006. Field Crops Production, 3rd edn, pp. 343. Directorate of Information and Publication of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan, Pusa, New Delhi.

Seleiman M F, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal N, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroglu T, Abdul-Wajid H H and Battaglia M L. 2021. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 10: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020259

Telkar S G, Singh A K and Kant K. 2018. Determination of effective spatial arrangement for intercropping of maize + soybean using dry matter yield and competition interaction. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(4): 2239–245.

Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M and Foolad M R. 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 199–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011

Downloads

Submitted

2023-02-07

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BIJARNIA, A. ., TETARWAL, J. P. ., & BIJARNIA, A. L. . (2024). Root and shoot studies of summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and baby corn (Zea mays) under intercropping system with different levels of fertility and stress-mitigating chemicals. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94(5), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i5.132997
Citation