A robust non-parametric stability measure to select stable genotypes
407 / 429
Keywords:
Environmental variations, Genotype × Environment, Interaction, Non-parametric stability analysis, Static and dynamic stability conceptsAbstract
Climate change has a considerable influence on agricultural output, raising farmers’ production risk. Nevertheless, the risk can be mitigated by selecting stable genotypes. In countries such as India, where significant proportions of farmers are smallholders or operate on marginal land, the minimization of risk is of paramount importance. Existing methods of stability measures often result in low-yielding varieties. Consequently, there is a need to develop more effective stability strategy to solve this problem without reducing yield. In light of the preceding, the Rank Based Stability Index (RSI) has been proposed for choosing genotypes based on the rank of interaction residuals to mitigate the influence of climatic changes without compromising yield. Through statistical analyses, the RSI approach demonstrates its ability to discern stable genotypes resilient to environmental fluctuations. By evaluating genotype performance across multiple environments and seasons, RSI identifies cultivars with consistent yield performance, thus offering a valuable tool for enhancing crop resilience and ensuring food security. The effectiveness of the proposed RSI approach for selecting stable genotypes from groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) data has been notably demonstrated in comparison to other methods. RSI emerges as a promising methodology for genotype selection in groundnut, offering a robust framework for mitigating the influence of climatic changes on crop yields.
Downloads
References
Afzal O, Hassan F U, Ahmed M, Shabbir G and Ahmed S. 2021. Determination of stable safflower genotypes in variable environments by parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 6: 100233.
Becker H C and Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, Vol. 101(1), pp. 1–23, Paul Parey Scientific Publishers, Berlin and Hamburg, Germany.
Comstock R E and Moll R H. 1963. Genotype-environment interactions. (In) Proceedings of National Symposium on Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council Publication, pp. 169–96.
Crossa J. 1990. Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. Advances in Agronomy 44: 55–85.
Garde Y A, Chaudhary A P, Bhimani P C, Modha K G, Shrivastava and Varshney N. 2023. Construction of selection indices by using different economic coefficients in Indian Bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet]. Legume Research 46(9): 1155–61.
Habib Shojaei S, Mostafavi K, Lak A, Omrani A, Omrani S, Mohammad Nasir Mousavi S, Illes A, Bojtor C and Nagy J. 2022. Evaluation of stability in maize hybrids using univariate parametric methods. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 25: 269–76.
Huehn M. 1979. Beitrage zur Erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. IVorschlag einiger auf Ranginformationen beruhenden Stabilitatsiarameter. EDV in Medicine and Biology 10: 112–17.
Kang M S. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications 16: 113–15.
Kang Y, Khan S and Ma X. 2009. Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security-A review. Progress in Natural Science 19: 1665–74.
Kumar D, Meena L R, Meena L K, Singh K and Singh S P. 2018. Stability analysis for cane and sugar yield of advanced sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) genotypes. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(3): 515–19.
Kumar P, Bhar L M, Paul A K, Das S and Roy H S. 2018. Development of composite stability measure using multi criteria decisions making (MCDM) techniques. Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 88(4): 499–503.
Kumar P, Kumar A, Panwar S, Dash S, Sinha k, Chaudhary V K and Ray M. 2018. Role of big data in agriculture-A statistical prospective. Annals of Agricultural Research 39(2): 210–15. Montgomery D C, Peck E A and Vining G G. 2012. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. 5th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Nassar R and Huehn M. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43: 45–53.
Piepho H P and Lotito S. 1992. Rank correlation among parametric and non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 64: 221–25.
Pour-Aboughadareh A, Khalili M, Poczai P and Olivoto T. 2022. Stability indices to deciphering the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) effect: An applicable review for use in plant breeding programmes. Plants 11(3): 414.
Rao A R and Prabhakaran V T. 2000. On some useful interrelationships among common stability parameters. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 60: 25–36.
Sabaghnia N, Dehghani H and Sabaghpour S H. 2006. Non- parametric methods for interpreting genotype × environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Science 46: 1100–06.
Shukla G K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of the variability. Heredity 29: 237–45.
Wricke G. 1962. A method of understanding the biological diversity in field research. Zeitchr Pflanzenzucht 47: 92–46.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.