Exploring the compatibility of interspecific grafting and budding methods in propagation of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis)


215 / 101

Authors

  • SURYA S College of Agriculture, Vellanikkara, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680 656, India image/svg+xml
  • ZAHIDA P M College of Agriculture, Vellanikkara, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680 656, India image/svg+xml
  • VISHNU RAJU College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala image/svg+xml
  • ANU G KRISHNAN Regional Agricultural Research Station (Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala), Kavanattinkara, Kumarakom, Kerala image/svg+xml
  • RESMI PAUL College of Agriculture, Vellanikkara, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala 680 656, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i03.159369

Keywords:

Artocarpus rootstocks, Propagation, Interspecific compatibility, Histology

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) and winter (rabi) seasons of 2023–24 at College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Kerala to identify suitable vegetative propagation methods and compatible rootstocks for breadfruit [Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg.]. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized complete block design (F-RCBD) with two factors, namely methods of propagation and types of rootstocks. Patch budding and softwood grafting were tried using one-year-old rootstocks of three different species, such as A. heterophyllus (Jackfruit), A. camansi (Breadnut) and A. hirsutus (Wild jack/Anjili). Success percentage, growth parameters and histological characteristics of budded and grafted plants were evaluated. Results revealed that patch budding was the most suitable propagation method with a success rate of 33.3% in rainy season compared to softwood grafting (3.33%) and A. camansi is more compatible with A. altilis (success rate 38.33%) compared to other two species. Patch budding on A. camansi in rainy season was identified as the superior with a success rate of 66.67% followed by patch budding on A. hirsutus (33.33%) and softwood grafting on A. camansi (10%). In contrast, A. heterophyllus exhibited poor compatibility with A. altilis and failed to produce viable grafted or budded plants, suggesting its incompatibility with breadfruit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Aizari A A, Dewir Y H, Ghazy A H, Al-Doss A and Al-Obeed R S. 2024. Micropropagation and genetic fidelity of fegra fig (Ficus palmata Forssk.) and grafting compatibility of the regenerated plants with Ficus carica. Plants 13(9): 1–22.

Bahadur A, Krishna H, Kumar R, Singh A K, Yadav S and Behera T K. 2024. Brinjal (Solanum melongena) rootstocks improve photosynthetic rate, fruit yield and quality parameters in grafted tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 94(10): 1075–80.

Baskaran A, Saraswathy S and Parthiban S. 2008. Standardisation of propagation methods of jack (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.). The Asian Journal of Horticulture 3(2): 361–63.

Bharad S G, Rajput L, Gonge V S and Dalal S R. 2006. Studies on time and method of vegetative propagation in Jamun. (In) Proceedings of the National Symposium on Production, Utilisation and Export of Underutilised Fruits with Commercial Potentialities, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, West Bengal, November 22–24, pp. 96–99.

Dolgun O, Tekintas F E and Ertan E. 2008. A histological investigation on graft formation of some nectarine cultivars grafted on pixy rootstock. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(5): 565–68.

Frey C, Acebes J L, Encina A and Alvarez R. 2020. Histological changes associated with the graft union development in tomato. Plants 9(11): 1–13.

Gainza F, Opazo I and Munoz C. 2015. Graft incompatibility in plants: Metabolic changes during formation and establishment of the rootstock/scion union with emphasis on Prunus species. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 75: 28–34.

Gopinath P P, Parsad R, Joseph B and Adarsh V S. 2020. GRAPES: General R Based Analysis Platform Empowered by Statistics. https://www.kaugrapes.com/

Habibi F, Liu T, Folta K and Sarkhosh A. 2022. Physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects of grafting in fruit trees. Horticulture Research 9: 1–18.

Hosomi A. 2015. Variation in graft compatibility of wild Ficus species as rootstock for common fig trees (Ficus carica). Acta Horticulturae 1173: 199–206.

Jevoor S R, Shirol A M and Nataraja K H. 2024. Influence of method of propagation, time and application of VA mycorrhizae on vegetative methods of propagation in Jamun. The Pharma Innovation Journal 13(5): 9–15.

Joshi P S, Jadhao B J and Chaudhari G V. 2011. Studies on vegetative propagation in custard apple. The Asian Journal of Horticulture 6(1): 261–63.

Kankaya A, Ozyigit S, Tekintas S E and Seferoglu G. 1999. The compatibility of some plum and apricot cultivars with pixy rootstock. (In) Proceedings of the Third National Horticulture Congress of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, September 14–17, pp. 295–99.

Kawaguchi M, Taji A, Backhouse D and Oda M. 2008. Anatomy and physiology of graft incompatibility in solanaceous plants. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 83: 581–88.

Koepke T and Dhingra A. 2013. Rootstock scion somatogenetic interactions in perennial composite plants. Plant Cell Reports 32: 1321–37.

Lee J M and Oda M. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews 28: 61–124.

Medagoda I and Chandrarathna K W M C J. 2007. Grafting of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) using breadnut (Artocarpus camansi) as rootstock. Acta Horticulturae 757: 149–52.

Muralidhara B M and Gowda I D. 2019. Soft wood grafting - A novel and rapid multiplication technique in Coorg mandarin (Citrus reticulate Blanco). Journal of Horticultural Sciences 14(1): 7–12.

Nandwani D and Kuniyuki A H. 2005. Grafting and improvement of breadfruit production in Micronesia. Acta Horticulturae 694: 307–10.

Ogden M A H and Campbell C W. 1980. Canistel as a rootstock for Mamey sapote. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 93: 133–36.

Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 1985. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Research, pp. 308–18. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Parrotta J A. 1994. Artocarpus altilis (S. Park.) Fosb. Breadfruit, Breadnut, Moraceae, Mulberry Family, pp. 1–6. International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, New Orleans.

Ragone D. 2006. Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit). (In) Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry, pp. 1–17. Elevitch C R (Ed). Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Holualoa, Hawaii.

Reig G, Zarrouk O, Forcada C F and Moreno M A. 2018. Anatomical graft compatibility study between apricot cultivars and different plum based rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae 237: 67–73.

Roberts-Nkrumah L B. 2012. Breadnut and Breadfruit Propagation, a Manual for Commercial Propagation, pp. 1–28. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Schoening U and Kollmann R. 1997. Phloem translocation in regenerating in vitro heterograft of different incompatibility. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 289–95.

Silva R M, Aguiar A V M, Garcia K G V, Faleiro F G, Mendonca V and Cardoso E. 2018. Germination and interspecific grafting of passion fruit. Comunicata Scientiae 9(3): 531– 34.

Solomon F K, Roberts-Nkrumah L B and Rouse-Miller J A. 2012. Development of a grafting protocol for the commercial propagation of three West Indian breadfruit cultivars. Tropical Agriculture 89(2): 85–98.

Visen A, Singh J N and Singh S P. 2010. Standardisation of wedge grafting in guava under the North Indian plains. Indian Journal of Horticulture 67: 111–14.

Zhou Y and Underhill S J R. 2018. Plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity and graft success of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) onto interspecific rootstocks of marang (A. odoratissimus) and pedalai (A. sericicarpus). Plant Biology 20(6): 978–85.

Zhou Y and Underhill S J R. 2019. A dwarf phenotype identified in breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) plants growing on marang (A. odoratissimus) rootstocks. Horticulturae 5(2): 1–11.

Zhou Y and Underhill S J R. 2022. Characterisation of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) plants growing on Lakoocha (A. lakoocha) rootstocks. Horticulturae 8(10): 1–12.

Zhou Y, Taylor M B and Underhill S J R. 2014. Dwarfing of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) trees: Opportunities and challenges. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 4: 1743–63.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-11-04

Published

2026-03-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

S, S., P M, Z. ., RAJU, V. ., KRISHNAN, A. G. ., & PAUL, R. . (2026). Exploring the compatibility of interspecific grafting and budding methods in propagation of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i03.159369
Citation