Comparative Assessment of Drone and Knapsack Sprayers for Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Management in Chickpea
7
Keywords:
Chickpea , drone, Helicoverpa armigera, natural enemies , phytotoxicity, precision agricultureAbstract
The effective management of pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea is critical to reducing yield losses. This study evaluates the efficacy of drone-based application of two insecticides, chlorantraniliprole 9.3% + lambda-cyhalothrin 4.6% ZC (200 ml/ha) and emamectin benzoate 5% + lufenuron 40% WG (60 ml/ha), compared to conventional knapsack spraying. Field trials were conducted at the Main Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad, during Rabi 2022-23. Drones applied ultra-low spray volumes (20 l/ha), while knapsack sprayers used 500 l/ha. Larval counts, pod damage, yield, and impact on natural enemies were recorded. Drone application achieved a 100% reduction in larval populations up to 10 days after spraying, compared to 60–80% with knapsack spraying. Pod damage was significantly lower with drones (1.50–2.56%) compared to knapsack sprays (11.48–11.67%). Yield increased to 16.50 q/ha with chlorantraniliprole + lambda-cyhalothrin applied via drones, compared to 10.88 q/ha with knapsack spraying. No phytotoxic effects were observed. Drone application increased larval reduction by 38%, reduced pod damage by 78–87%, and enhanced yield by 31–35%. Despite some reduction in parasitoid populations, drones offer superior pest control and operational efficiency, particularly in labor-scarce areas. This study highlights the potential of drone technology for large-scale, precise, and sustainable pest management in chickpea cultivation. Further research is needed to optimize application rates to balance pest control and conservation of natural enemies.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2022a. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for drone use of drone application with pesticides for crop protection and for spraying soil and crop nutrients in agricultural, forestry and non-cropped areas etc. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, India, pp. 1–36.
Anonymous. 2022b. Gazette Notification of Drone Rules-2021. Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India, pp. 24–43.
Anonymous. 2022c. Office memorandum on Interim approval of pesticide formulations through drone dtd 18-4-2022. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, Government of India, pp. 1–18.
Badariprasad P R, Goudar S B, Narappa G and Pradeep B. 2020. Management of chickpea podborer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) with a novel new insecticide, broflanilide 30% SC (BAS 450 01 I 300 SC). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(2): 1806–10.
Dengeru Y, Ramasamy K, Allimuthu S, Balakrishnan S, Kumar A P M, Kannan B and Karuppasami K M. 2022. Study on spray deposition and drift characteristics of UAV agricultural sprayer for application of insecticide in redgram crop (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.). Agronomy 12(12): 3196.
Feng B, Zhi H, Chen H, Cui B, Zhao X, Sun C, Wang Y, Cui H and Zeng Z. 2021. Development of chlorantraniliprole and lambda cyhalothrin double-loaded nano-microcapsules for synergistical pest control. Nanomaterials 11(10): 2730. DOI: 10.3390/nano11102730.
Gil J, Nadal S, Luna D, Moreno M T and De Haro A. 1996. Variability of some physicochemical characters in desi- and Kabuli chickpea types. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 71: 179–84.
Ibrikci H, Knewtson S and Grusa M. 2003. Chickpea leaves as a vegetable green for humans—Evaluation of mineral composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 945–50. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1427.
Kambrekar D N, Kulkarni K A, Giraddi R S, Kulkarni J H and Fakruddin B. 2009. Management of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) through Nuclear Polyhedral Virus isolates. Precision Agriculture 10: 450–7. DOI: 10.1007/s11119-009-9115-3.
Kambrekar D N, Somanagouda G, Basavarajapp M P and Halagalimath S B. 2012. Effect of different dosages of emamectin benzoate 5 SG and indoxacarb 14.5 SC on pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera infesting chickpea. Legume Research 35(1): 13–7.
Krishna Japur R, Naveena and Hosamani A C. 2016. Bio-efficacy of emamectin benzoate 5 WG against pigeon pea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) under field condition in steppe climate of HK region. Journal of Environment and Bioscience 30(1): 165–7.
Lal S S. 1992. Scope and limitation of integrated pest management in chickpea. Proceedings of National Symposium on New Frontiers in Pulses Research and Development, pp. 139–53. 10–12 November 1989, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, UP (India).
Mallet J. 1989. The evolution of insecticide resistance: Have the insects won? Tree 4: 336–40. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90088-8.
Prakash H T, Jagginavar S B and Mallappa B. 2021. Field evaluation of new molecule emamectin benzoate 5% + lufenuron 40% WG (Proclaim fit®) against pod borer Helicoverpa armigera and Marcua vitrata in pigeonpea. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 9(1): 251–5.
Rao V S. 1986. Principles of Weed Science. 450 p. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
Reed W, Cardona C, Sithanantham S and Lateef S S. 1987. Chickpea insect pests and their control. The Chickpea, pp. 283–318. Saxena M C and Singh K B (Eds). Kluwer, Dordecht/Oxford/CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Sachan J N and Katti G. 1994. Integrated pest management. Proceedings of International Symposium on Pulses Research, pp. 23–30. 2–6 April 1994, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sharma H C. 2005. Helicoverpa management. Heliothis Management—Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research, p. 469. Sharma H C (Ed). Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi.
Sudha Rani D, Pradeep Kumar S, Venkatesh M N, Nagasatyasri C H and Anand Kumar K. 2018. Bio-efficacy of insecticides against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in redgram. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6(2): 3173–6.
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.