Evaluation of physiological indices and grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)cultivars under different sowing schedules
98 / 29
Keywords:
Chlorophyll content, Growth type, Harvest index, Seed yieldAbstract
Environmental variations significantly impact crop productivity, highlighting the need for optimised planting dates and cultivar selection. This study, conducted during 2020–22 in Mobarakeh, Iran, aimed to assess the effects of planting dates and cultivars on physiological indices and grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment followed a split-plot design (SPD) with three replications having planting dates (early: October 20, normal: November 20, late: December 20) as a main factor and six wheat cultivars [Zare and Heydari (winter type), Pishgam and Alvand (intermediate type) and Sirvan and Pishtaz (spring type)] were considered as the sub-factor. The results indicated that delayed planting (December 20) significantly decreased leaf nitrogen (by 12% approx.) and phosphorus content. Physiological assessments, including leaf relative water content (RWC) measured by the standard fresh/turgid/ dry weight method, revealed that delayed planting significantly decreased RWC (from about 77% to 69%) and radiation use efficiency (by 25–27%), while increasing ion leakage (up to 38.8% in winter types) and light extinction coefficient. Photosynthetic rates were highest in winter cultivars when sown early (up to 7.22 μmol/m2/sec) but spring cultivars (Sirvan and Pishtaz) performed better under late sowing (up to 6.10 μmol/m2/sec). As a result, grain yield was significantly reduced by late sowing. Winter and intermediate cultivars had the highest yields when sown early (up to 6,535 kg/ha), while spring types showed more adaptability to late planting, maintaining relatively stable yields. Therefore, early sowing (October 20) is recommended for maximising grain yield, particularly for winter and intermediate wheat cultivars. For scenarios where late planting is unavoidable, the use of spring-type cultivars (Sirvan and Pishtaz) is suggested as a practical strategy to mitigate yield losses and enhance the resilience of wheat production systems under variable climatic conditions.
Downloads
References
Arshad M N, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Rasul F, Khaliq T, Awais M and Fatima H N. 2016. Quantification of growth, yield and radiation use efficiency of sunflower at different irrigation and nitrogen levels under semi-arid conditions of Faisalabad. Journal of Agricultural Research 54(4): 647–56.
Attarzadeh M, Balouchi H, Rajaie M, Movahhedi Dehnavi M and Salehi A. 2019. Growth and nutrient content of Echinacea purpurea as affected by the combination of phosphorus with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and Pseudomonas florescent bacterium under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Environmental Management 231: 182–88. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.040
Bagheri F and Balouchi H R. 2013. The effect of planting date on some quantitative and qualitative traits of nine grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cultivars in Yasouj region. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 3(9): 29–43.
Bhattacharya A. 2018. Changing Climate and Resource Use Efficiency in Plants. Academic Press, Amsterdam.
Dai X, Wang Y, Dong X, Qian T, Yin L, Dong S, Chu J and He M. 2017. Delayed sowing can increase lodging resistance while maintaining grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat. The Crop Journal 5: 541–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cj.2017.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.05.003
FAOSTAT. 2019. Food and Agriculture Data. Statistical Division, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome. Flohr B, Hunt J, Kirkegaard J, Evans J, Trevaskis B, Zwart A, Swan A, Fletcher A and Rheinheimer B. 2018. Fast winter wheat phenology can stabilise flowering date and maximise grain yield in semi-arid Mediterranean and temperate environments. Field Crops Research 223: 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. fcr.2018.03.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.021
Gray L K, Hamann A, John S, Rweyongeza D, Barnhardt L and Thomas B R. 2016. Climate change risk management in tree improvement programmes: Selection and movement of genotypes. Tree Genetics and Genomes 12: 23. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11295-016-0983-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-016-0983-1
Hatfield J L and Dold C. 2018. Agroclimatology and wheat production: Coping with climate change. Frontiers in plant science 9: 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00224
Hu M and Wiatrak P. 2012. Effect of planting date on soybean growth, yield and grain quality. Agronomy Journal 104: 785–90. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0382
Hunt J R. 2017. Winter wheat cultivars in Australian farming systems: A review. Crop and Pasture Science 68: 501–15. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17173
Kahiluoto H, Kaseva J, Balek J, Olesen J E, Ruiz-Ramos M, Gobin A, Kersebaum K C, Takáč J, Ruget F and Ferrise R. 2019. Decline in climate resilience of European wheat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116: 123–28. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1804387115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804387115
Kamaei H, Eisvand H R, Daneshvar M and Nazarian F. 2019. The study effects of planting date, phosphate bio-fertiliser and foliar application of zinc and boron on leaf area index, leaf area duration, leaf relative water content, cell membrane stability, quantum efficiency of PSII, leaf proline content and grain yield of bread wheat. Plant Process and Function 8(29): 59–74.
Kamara A Y, Ekeleme F, Chikoye D and Omoigui L O. 2009. Planting date and cultivar effects on grain yield in dryland corn production. Agronomy Journal 101: 91–98. https://doi. org/10.2134/agronj2008.0090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0090
Khichar M L and Niwas I. 2006. Microclimatic profiles under different sowing environment in wheat. Journal of Agrometeorology 8: 201–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v8i2.1048
Lake L and Sadras V. 2017. Associations between yield, intercepted radiation and radiation-use efficiency in chickpea. Crop and Pasture Science 68(2): 140–47. https://doi.org/10.1071/ CP16356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16356
Mohammadghasemi V, Moghaddam S S, Rahimi A, Pourakbar L and Popović-Djordjević J. 2021. Morpho-biochemical traits and macro-elements of Lallemantia iberica (MB) Fischer & Meyer, as affected by winter (late autumn) sowing, chemical and nano-fertiliser sources. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 43: 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-020-03169-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-020-03169-y
Monsi M and Saeki T. 1953. On the light factor in plant communities and its significance for biomass production. Japanese Journal of Botany 14: 22–52.
Monteith J L. 1972. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 9: 747–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2401901
Mubvuma M T, Ogola J B and Mhizha T. 2021. Effect of planting date and genotype on intercepted radiation and radiation use efficiency in chickpea crop (Cicer arietinum L.). Cogent Food and Agriculture 7: 1899422. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2021.1899422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2021.1899422
Pradhan S, Sehgal V K, Das D K, Jain A K, Bandyopadhyay K K, Singh R and Sharma P K. 2014. Effect of weather on seed yield and radiation and water use efficiency of mustard cultivars in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management 139: 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.005
Richards M F, Preston A L, Napier T, Jenkins L and Maphosa L. 2020. Sowing date affects the timing and duration of key chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth phases. Plants 9(10): 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101257
Sairam R K, Dharmar K, Chinnusamy V and Meena R C. 2009. Water logging-induced increase in sugar mobilisation, fermentation and related gene expression in the roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata). Journal of Plant Physiology 6: 602–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.005
Shah F, Coulter J A, Ye C and Wu W. 2020. Yield penalty due to delayed sowing of winter wheat and the mitigatory role of increased seeding rate. European Journal of Agronomy 119: 126120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126120
Shah F and Wu W. 2019. Soil and crop management strategies to ensure higher crop productivity within sustainable environments. Sustainability 11: 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11051485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051485
Ullah H, Santiago-Arenas R, Ferdous Z, Attia A and Datta A. 2019. Improving water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency and radiation use efficiency in field crops under drought stress: A review. Advances in agronomy 156: 109–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.02.002
UR Rahman M H, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Hussain M, Rasul F, Ishaque W, Islam M A, Shelia V, Awais M and Ullah A. 2019. Application of CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton model for cultivars and optimum planting dates: Evaluation in changing semi- arid climate. Field Crops Research 238: 139–52. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.007
Weatherely P E. 1950. Studies in water relation on cotton plants, the field measurement of water deficit in leaves. New Phytologist 49: 81–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1950.tb05146.x
Wu L, Feng L, Zhang Y, Gao J and Wang J. 2017. Comparison of five wheat models simulating phenology under different sowing dates and varieties. Agronomy Journal 109: 1280–93. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.10.0619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.10.0619
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.