Host-pathogen interaction in Brassica juncea recombinant inbred lines for powdery mildew resistance using BLUP and GGE biplot analysis
57
Keywords:
Brassica juncea, Recombinant inbred lines, Erysiphe cruciferarum, powdery mildew, BLUP, GGE biplotAbstract
Powdery mildew, caused by the obligate biotrophic fungus Erysiphe cruciferarum, substantially reduces Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern] productivity, with yield losses reaching 90% under favourable conditions. A population of 259 F₈ recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the cross RDV 29 (resistant) × RSEJ 775 (susceptible) was assessed for powdery mildew resistance using a 0-5 ordinal disease severity scale across six environments, at three locations viz., New Delhi, Nagpur, and Gujarat over two consecutive seasons (2023-24 and 2024-25), under natural epiphytotic conditions. Combined analysis of variance showed highly significant effects of genotype (F = 17.21), location (F = 466.91), and year (F = 26.88). The genotype×location interaction was significant (F = 5.99; P < 0.001), whereas the genotype×year interaction was not, confirming that resistance rankings were stable across seasons. Broad-sense heritability was moderate (H² = 0.47), with a genetic advance of 42.3%, indicating primarily additive gene action. The Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) analysis identified 10 elite RILs with breeding values equivalent to those of the resistant parent and consistent resistance across environments. GGE biplot analysis explained 80.84% of the total GGE variation and detected no crossover genotype×environment interaction among resistant genotypes, supporting their broad adaptability. The Gujarat location was the most representative environment for screening for resistance, whereas the Nagpur location had the highest discriminative ability. This is the first report on host-pathogen interactions involving RILs generated from a newly identified and only powdery mildew resistance source identified in B. juncea from India.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Alvarado G, Rodríguez F M, Pacheco A, Burgueño J, Crossa J, Vargas M, Pérez-Elizalde J and Lopez-Cruz M A. 2020. META-R: a software to analyze data from multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Journal 8: 745–756.
Aravind J, Mukesh Sankar S, Wankhede D P and Kaur V. 2020. augmentedRCBD: Analysis of Augmented Randomised Complete Block Designs. R package version 0.1.6. Zenodo.
Cullis B R, Smith A B, Beeck C P and Cowling W A. 2010. Analysis of yield and oil from a series of canola breeding trials. Part II. Exploring variety by environment interaction using factor analysis. Genome 53: 1002–1016.
Cullis B R, Smith A B and Coombes N E. 2006. On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 11: 381–393.
Falconer D S and Mackay T F C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman Group Ltd., Harlow, UK.
Henderson C R. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423–447.
Johnson H W, Robinson H F and Comstock R E. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 47: 314–318.
Lush J L. 1940. Intra-sire correlations or regressions of offspring on dam as a method of estimating heritability of characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 1940: 293–301.
McDonald B A and Linde C. 2002. Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 349–379.
Nanjundan J, Manjunatha C, Radhamani J, Thakur A K, Yadav R, Kumar A, Meena M L, Tyagi R K, Yadava D K and Singh D. 2020. Identification of new source of resistance to powdery mildew of Indian mustard and studying its inheritance. Plant Pathology Journal 36: 111–120.
Olivoto T and Lúcio A D C. 2020. metan: an R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11: 783–789.
Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, 2nd edn. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Piepho H P, Möhring J, Melchinger A E and Büchse A. 2008. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161: 209–228.
Piepho H P and Möhring J. 2007. Computing heritability and selection response from unbalanced plant breeding trials. Genetics 177: 1881–1888.
Saharan G S, Mehta N K and Meena P D. 2019. The disease: powdery mildew. In Powdery Mildew Disease of Crucifers: Biology, Ecology and Disease Management, pp. 17–51. Springer Singapore, Singapore.
Singh K P, Kumari P and Rai P K. 2021. Current status of the disease-resistant gene(s)/QTLs, and strategies for improvement in Brassica juncea. Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 617405.
Tolhurst D J, Mathews K L, Smith A B and Cullis B R. 2019. Genomic selection in multi-environment plant breeding trials using a factor analytic linear mixed model. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 136: 279-300.
Uloth M B, You M P and Barbetti M J. 2018. Plant age and ambient temperature: significant drivers for powdery mildew (Erysiphe cruciferarum) epidemics on oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Plant Pathology 67: 445-456.
Wei T and Simko V. 2021. R package 'corrplot': Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.92). CRAN.
Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40: 597–605.
Yan W and Kang M S. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius P L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47: 643–655.
Zhang M, Gong Q, Su X, Cheng Y, Wu H, Huang Z, Xu A, Dong J and Yu C. 2022. Microscopic and transcriptomic comparison of powdery mildew resistance in the progenies of Brassica carinata × B. napus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23: 9961.
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
|
|
|