Effect of planting patterns and weed management on weed suppression, productivity and economics of African mustard (Brassica carinata) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping
244 / 90
Keywords:
lntercropping, Planting pattern, Weed management, Indian mustard, African mustard, Productivity, Weed controlAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 1999-2001 to assess the feasibility of intercropping African mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) and Indian ITIustard {Brassica juncea (L.) Czemj & Cosson} under 6 planting patterns and 3 weed managenlent practices. Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin @ 1 kg/ha or 1 hand weeding at 20 days after sowing effectively controlled the weeds and demonstrated a significant increase in seed yield of component crops~ system seed yield and net returns over weedy check. Among the weed control treatments, 1 hand weeding at 20 days after sowing proved better in all respect than the pendimethalin and gave 18.6 and 8.3 % higher seed yield of component crops. Sole Indian mustard recorded higher weed control efficiency and suppressed weed count by 12.2 ern and weed dry mass by 29.4 %over the sole African mustard. Contrary to this, African mustard gave significantly higher seed yield (2.51 tonnes/ha) and net returns (Rs18 020/ha) that were 9.6 and 13.9 % higher than the sole Indian mustard. Intercropping systems significantly reduced the weed count and weed dry weight compared to sole stand. Among the intercropping systcnlS, paired row planting at 45/1 05 em in 2:2 row ratio gave the highest total seed yield (2.82 tonnes/ 11a), LER (1.18), net returns (Rs 21 220/ha) and benefiteost ratio (3.84), which were 14.3, 18.0, 17.7 and 11.8 % higher than sole African mustard.
Downloads
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.