Use of soft, semi-soft and hard-seeded types of pomegranate (Punica granatunm) for improvement of fruit attributes

Abstract

Eighteen varieties or genotupes representisng soft;semi-hard seeded promgranate (Punica granatum L.)
were evaluated for II fruit attributes, The result was studied for overall variation, variation within group and intergroup
comparison. The overall inter-genotypic differences were signiticant for fruit weight, rind thickness, total solu-
ble solids (TSS), acidity, aril weight/fruit and aril weight/1OO g fruit. Signiticant variations were obselved within soft
types for 100-aril weight; within semi-soil varieties for 100-aril weight, TSS, seed mellowness and anil weight/100 g
fruit; and within hard-seeded entries for rind thickness and aril weight 100 g truit. Comparison of soft, semi-'soft and
hard-seeded types showed that for many fiuit attributes soft and semi-soil groups were similar whereas hard-seeded
was a class apart, having signilicantly higher fruit weight and volume than the former 2 groups. But they possessed as
much arils as soil and semi-soft seeded types with significantly low juice (%). The estimated juice/100 g fruit for hard,seeded
types was as low as 28 g in contrast to 44.5 g and 40.5 g for soft and semi-semi. seeded pomegranate respectively,
Despite smaller fruit size, soft types therefore can he appropriate parents in evolving varieties for juice purpose,
Hybridization within soil types was expected to generate restricted variability. as revealed by low CV for this group.
The hard-seeded types could be good donor for improvement of some fruit attributes.