Biological feasibility, economic viability and energy efficiency of intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)
384 / 58
Keywords:
Agrobiology, Energy return, Intercropping, Land equivalent ratio, Monetary advantage index, Sesbania aculeata, SorghumAbstract
A field experiment was conducted at CCSHAU, Hisar during kharif seasons of 2011 and 2012 with ten treatments in randomized block design replicated thrice to evaluate the intercropping of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) grown for seed. Results revealed that 1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops. Hence, for seed production sesbania was sown at 90 cm spacing intercropped with three rows of fodder sorghum in between two rows of sesbania to supplement the income of farmers.
Downloads
References
Ahmad A U H, Ahmad R, Mahmood N and Nazir M S. 2006.Competitive performance of associated forage crops grown in different forage sorghum-legume intercropping systems. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 43(1-2): 25–31.
Bhatti I H, Ahmad R and Nazir M S. 2005. Agronomic traits of sorghum as affected by grain legumes intercropping and planting patterns. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 42: 56 – 60.
Chianeh E R, Nassab A D M, Shakiba M R ,Golezani K G, Aharizad S and Shekari F. 2011. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) at different plant population densities. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(7): 1 786–93.
Das A and Sudhishri S. 2010. Intercropping in fingermillet (Eleusine coracana) with pulses for enhanced productivity, resource conservation and soil fertility in uplands of southern Orissa. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(2): 89–94.
Devasenapathy P, Senthilkumar G and Shanmugam P M. 2009. Energy management in crop production. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(1): 50–90.
De Wilt C T. 1960. On competition. Verslag Land-bouwkundige Onderzoek No. 66(8): 1–82.
Dhima K V, Lithourgidis A S, Vasilakoglou I B and Dordas C A. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research 100: 249–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008
Dutta D and Bandyopadhyay P. 2006. Production potential of intercropping of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) with pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and maize (Zea mays) under various row proportions in rainfed Alfisols of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(2): 103–6.
Ghosh P K, Bandyopadhyay K K, Wanjari R H, Manna M C, Misra A K, Mohanty M and Subba Rao A. 2007. Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use-efficiency in major cropping systems–An Indian perspective: A review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 30(1): 61–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v30n01_07
Hiebsch C K and Macollam R E. 1980. Area time equivalency ratio. A method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal 79: 15–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010004x
ICAR.2012. Forage crops and grasses. Handbook of Agriculture, pp 1 353–1 417. ICAR New Delhi.
Khan M B, Akhtar M and Khaliq A. 2001. Some competition functions and economics of different cotton-based intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 3(4): 428–31.
Kujur S, Ahmad S, Srivastava G P and Singh C S. 2010. Performance of (Cajanus cajan) intercropping as influenced by row ratios and duration of fingermillet (Elusine coracana) cultivars. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(3): 209–14.
Kumar A and Thakur K S. 2009. Effect of intercropping in situ green manures and fertility levels on productivity and soil nitrogen balance in maize (Zea mays)-gobhi sarson (Brassica napus) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(9): 758 –62.
McGilchrist C A. 1965. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics 21: 975–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2528258
Muhammad A, Umer E M and Karim A. 2008. Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using different planting patterns. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi 14(4): 326–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001048
Odo P E.1991. Evaluating short and tall shorghum varieties in mixture with cowpea in Sudan Savanna of Nigeria: LER, grain yield and system productivity index. Experimental Agriculture 27: 435–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700019426
Pal M, Singh K A and Ahlawat I P S. 1985. Cropping system research: Concept, needs and directions. (In) Proceedings of the National symposium by Indian Society of Agronomy, CSSRI, Karnal, 3-5 April 1985, pp 1–45.
Panse V G and Sukhatme P U. 1995. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
Ramamoorthy K, Lourduraj A C, Alagudurai S, Kandasamy O S and Murugappan V. 2004. Intercropping pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) on productivity and soil fertility under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49(1): 28–30.
Sankaranarayanan K, olaimalai A and Sankaran N. 2005. Intercropping of legumes in fodder sorghum-a review. Agricultural Review 26(3): 217–22.
Sheoran P, Sardana V, Singh S and Singh S. 2009. Productivity potential and economic feasibility of maize (Zea mays)- greengram (Vigna radiata) intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(7): 535–7.
Singh K P, Prakash V, Srinivas K and Srivastva A K. 2008. Effect of tillage management on energy–use efficiency and economics of soyabean (Glycine max) based cropping system under rainfed conditions in north west Himalayan region. Soil and Tillage Research 100: 78–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.04.011
Singh N B, Singh R S and Verma K K. 2013. Intensification of rice (Oryza sativa) based cropping sequences with summer mungbean (Vigna radiata) in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(2): 133–6.
Tuti M D, Mahanta D, Bhattacharyya R, Pandey B M, Bist J K and Bhatt J C. 2013. Productivity, economics and energetic of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) – based cropping system in mid hills of north west Himalaya. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(3): 303–8.
Verma S P and Modgal S C.1983. Production potential and economics of fertilizer application as resource constraints in maize-wheat crop sequence. Himachal Pradesh Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 26–46.
Verma S S, Joshi Y P and Sexena S C. 2005. Effect of row ratio of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) intercropping systems on productivity, competition functions and economics under rainfed conditions of north India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(2): 123–5.
Willey R W.1979. Intercropping-it’s importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts. 32(1):7.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.