Weed management strategies in maize (Zea mays): Effect on weed dynamics, productivity and economics of the maize- wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Indo-gangetic plains


553 / 49

Authors

  • ADITYA KUMAR SINGH Principal Scientist, Agronomy, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • C M PARIHAR Scientist, Agronomy, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • S L JAT Scientist, Agronomy, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • BAHADUR SINGH JRA, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • SAVITA SHARMA JRA, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i1.46004

Keywords:

Economics, Herbicide, Maize cowpea, System productivity, Weed dynamics, Weed index

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different herbicidal treatments along with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) as live mulch crop as one of the treatments in preceeding maize (Zea mays L.) and their residual effects on succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop during 2010-11 and 2011-12. In maize field, metribuzin/atrazine was not found effective to control Dactyloctenium colonum, however, application of metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha as pre emergence (PE) followed by one hand weeding at 21 DAS was found most effective in controlling this weed. Metribuzin 0.25 kg/ha as PE + one hand weeding (HW) and maize + cowpea intercropping resulted in significantly lowest weed index which remained at par with atrazine as PE + one HW. However, after pooled analysis of results significantly highest grain yield (6 785 kg/ha) of maize was obtained with two HW, while highest grain yield of succeeding wheat (6 191 kg/ha) was obtained with the preceding effect of maize + cowpea. The highest pooled system productivity as maize equivalent yield (14 136 kg/ha) was obtained with maize + cowpea treatment which remained at par with application of atrazine or metribuzin as PE plus one HW. Significantly highest pooled gross (Rupees 153 864/ha), net (Rupees 101 948/ha) returns and B:C ratio (1.96) were also obtained with maize + cowpea, which remained at par with other tested weed management practices. The results indicate that inclusion of cowpea as cover crop in maize-wheat system will not only increase the profitability but also provide environment friendly option against the use of herbicides for weed management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adigbo S O, Iyasere E, Fabunmi T O, Olowe V I O and Adejuyigbe C O. 2013. Effect of spatial arrangement on the performance of cowpea /maize intercrop in derived Savannah of Nigeria. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3(4): 959–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2013/4055

Balyan J S and Seth J. 1985. Effect of pure and intercropped stands of maize and cowpea on succeeding wheat. Indian Journal of Agronomy 30(2): 177–80.

Dass S, Kumar A, Jat S L, Parihar C M, Singh A K, Chikkappa G K and Jat M L. 2012. Maize holds potential for diversification and livelihood security. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(3rd IAC Special Issue):32–7.

Jamshidi K, Yousefi A R and Oveisi M. 2013. Effect of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping on weed biomass and maize (Zea mays) yield. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 41(4): 180–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2013.807853

Kandasamy O S and Chandrasekhar C N. 1998. Comparative efficacy of chemical and non-chemical methods of weed management in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science 30 (3&4): 201–3.

Kurchania S P, Tiwari J P, Trivedi K K and Dubey M P. 1989. Herbicide weed control in soybean. Pesticides XXIII: 42–8. Liebman M and Davis A S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Research 40: 27–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164.x

Pandey A K, Singh Prem, Prakash Ved, Singh R D and Chauhan V S. 1999. Direct and residual effect of weed control measures in maize (Zea mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under mid-hill conditions of north-western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Weed Science 31 (3 & 4): 204–9.

Peterson T A and Russelle M P. 1991. Alfalfa and the nitrogen cycle in the corn belt. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 46: 229–5.

Saini J P and Angiras N N. 1998. Efficacy of herbicides alone and in mixture to control weeds in maize under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Weed Science 30 : 65– 8.

Sharma R and Pankaj. 2013. Direct and residual effect of different herbicides applied in maize (Zea mays) on weed dynamics and productivity of maize and succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83 (1): 77–2.

Sharma, Vinod and Thakur D R. 1998. Integrated weed management in maize (Zea mays) under mid-hill condition of north-western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Weed Science 30 (3&4):158–2.

Teasdale J R and Mohler C L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agronomy Journal 85: 673–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030029x

Downloads

Submitted

2015-01-16

Published

2015-01-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, A. K., PARIHAR, C. M., JAT, S. L., SINGH, B., & SHARMA, S. (2015). Weed management strategies in maize (Zea mays): Effect on weed dynamics, productivity and economics of the maize- wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Indo-gangetic plains. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i1.46004
Citation