Social and economic benefits of cashew (Anacardium occidentale) cultivation in Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka: An analysis of the impact, its determinants and constraints
689 / 361
Keywords:
Cashew farmers, Constraints, determinants, Socio-economic impactAbstract
The study measured social and economic benefits accrued from cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) cultivation in relation with constraints faced by cashew farmers in the Dakshina Kannada district of Karnataka. An ‘ex-post-facto cause to effect’ design was used and findings indicated that most cashew farmers derived moderate socio-economic benefits particularly with high social benefits in comparison to low economic benefits. High levels of social participation, extension participation, mass media exposure and opinion leadership were measured among majority of the farmers practicing cashew cultivation. Impact on cropping pattern, labour engagement and farm expenditure were found to be low while increase in family incomes and expenditure were reported. The regression analysis revealed that four personal variables, viz. the age of cashew farmer, years of experience in farming, cosmopoliteness and distance of cashew plot from home and one economic variable, i.e. importance given to cashew cultivation as exerting a significant positive contribution towards explaining the variability in socio-economic impact. The variables used in the study could together explain up to 67% variability in socio-economic impact. The stepwise regression model developed to predict socio-economic impact explained up to 68% of the variation in socioeconomic impact using the predictors; importance given to cashew (X1), years of experience in farming (X2), cosmopoliteness (X3), distance of cashew plot from home (X4), extension participation (X5), land used for other crops (X6) and net income from cashew farming (X7). The study revealed major constraints faced by farmers like poor price quoted by traders and the price fluctuations for raw cashew nut, scarcity of of hired labourers, incidence of tea mosquito bug owing to crop loss and death of yielding trees due to cashew stem and root borer attack.Downloads
References
Akinwale T O and Ayodele E A. 1999. Production constraints. Quarterly Nigeria’s First Magazine Journal 2(9): 47–88.
Aravindakshan M and Pathummal Beevi. 1992. Cashew production technologies relevant to Kerala. (In) Proceedings of National Workshop on Cashew, Kannur. Balasubramanian P P (Eds). Directorate of Cashew and Cocoa Development, Kochi, Kerala.
CEPCI. 2013. Cashew Statistics. Website: http://www.cashewindia.org/php/cepcContents.php?CatID=29.
DCCD. 2014. Area, Production and Productivity of cashew in India. Directorate of Cashewnut and Cocoa Development, Kochi, India.
DCR. 2011. Vision 2030. Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur. Dixit S, Raviprasad T N and Yadukumar N. 1998. Cashew plant protection campaign. Cashew 12(1): 21–31.
Dixit S and Bhaskara Rao Evv. 1999. Problems in cashew cultivation. Cashew 13(3): 3–16.
Ganapathi H A and Akash S B. 2013. Constraints of farmers in cashew production – A case study of Udupi district of Karnataka State. Cashew Bulletin 51(7): 7–11.
Jaffee S. 1995. Private sector response to market liberalization in Tanzania’s cashew nut industry. Marketing Africa’s High Value Crops, pp 153–98. Jaffee S Morton and Dubuque J (Eds). Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Iowa.
Lakshmisha R. 2000. Impact of cashew demonstrations on knowledge, adoption and yield levels of farmers in Dakshina Kannada district. M Sc (Ag) thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
Mandavkar P M, Kokate K D and Bairamkar M S. 2003. Adoption of improved varieties of cashew nut. Maharashtra Journal of Extension Education 22(1): 113–6.
NABARD. 2007. Cashewnuts in Orissa. (In) Evaluation study series: Orissa RO: No 12, p 97. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Bhubaneshwar.
Nirban A J and Sawant P A. 2000. Constraint analysis of cashewnut growers. Cashew 14(1): 45–9.
Sajeev M V, Saroj P L and Lakshmisha R. 2014. Technology impacts on area, production and productivity of cashew in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka. Journal of Plantation Crops 42(1): 62–9.
Salam M A, Satheesh Babu and Balasubramanian P P. 1992. Trends in cashew production in Kerala - An Analysis. Cashew 5(3): 3–7.
Shivaramu K, Manjunatha D, Mohan E and Guruprasad T R. 2004. Impact of cashew demonstration on adoption of recommended cultivation practices by farmers. Cashew 18(2): 16–21.
Veerkar P D, Wadkar S S, Bhosale S S and Bagade S R. 2006. Constraint analysis of cashew production in South Konkan region of Maharashtra. Cashew 20(3): 11–22.
Venkattakumar R and Bhat M G. 2003. Widening cashew growers’ perspectives. Cashew 17(2): 5–30.
Venkattakumar R. 2006. Socio-economic impact of cashew cultivation in Kannur District of Kerala, India. Journal of Plantation Crops 34(3): 709–14.
Venkattakumar R. 2008. Socio-economic impact of cashew cultivation in Sindhudurg district of Maharashtra. Journal of Plantation Crops 36(2): 117–22.
Venkattakumar R. 2009. Socio-economic factors for cashew production and implicative strategies: An overview. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 9(3): 55–62.
Yadav S. 2010. Economics of Cashew in India, p 116. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Bhubaneshwar.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.