Gamma irradiation of in-vitro proliferated cultures of rose (Rosa hybrida) for induction of novel mutants


354 / 167

Authors

  • MADHU BALA
  • KANWAR PAL SINGH

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i1.55253

Keywords:

Gamma rays, MS medium, Rose, Variants

Abstract

In-vitro mutations were induced in two Hybrid Tea rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cultivars Pusa Mohit and Raktima for induction of novel traits. Single node cuttings were used to proliferate cultures under in-vitro and were irradiated with different doses of g-rays (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 Gy) using a 60Co source. The g-irradiated microshoots were then cultured aseptically on to rooting medium containing 0.5 × MS basal medium supplemented with 2.69 µM a- naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) plus 2.46 µM 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) plus 40 g/l sucrose and 0.8% (w/v) agar- agar for rooting. Decreased root lengths, numbers of roots per shoot were observed at 25 Gy. In-vitro proliferated cultures and non-irradiated (control) plants were transferred to plastic pots 1 month after acclimatization under laboratory conditions and examined for their morphological traits. Marked vegetative abnormalities with respect to leaf shape, leaf lamina, fused leaves, albinism or leaves with less chlorophyll, variegated leaves with stunted growth etc. were observed between the mutated and control populations. Four new variants with altered or novel flower colour, form, shape and size were isolated and numbered as PM 1, PM 2 (from cv. Pusa Mohit) and RK 1, RK 2 (from cv. Raktima) as compared to the original cultivars. These variants were multiplied on a large-scale through micropropagation and evaluated for their stability. This study developed a mutagenesis protocol that could be used to develop novel flower colour mutants in rose.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • MADHU BALA
    Assistant Floriculturist, Department of Floriculture and Landscaping, PAU, Ludhiana, Punjab 1410 04;
  • KANWAR PAL SINGH
    Principal Scientist, Division of Floriculture and
    Landscaping, IARI.

References

Arnold N P, Barthakur N N and Tanguay M. 1998. Mutagenic effects of acute gamma-irradiation on miniature roses. Target theory approach. Horticultural Science 33: 127–9.

Bala M, Singh K P, Singh S K and Prasad K V. 2013. Standardization of an efficient protocol for in vitro mass multiplication of Hybrid Tea rose cv. Raktima. Indian Journal of Horticulture 70: 404–10.

Bala M, Singh K P and Prasad K V. 2010. Standardization of in vitro mass multiplication protocol for hybrid tea rose cv. Pusa Mohit. Indian Journal of Horticulture 67: 225–9.

Banerjee B K and Datta S K. 2002. Induction and analysis of somatic mutation in chrysanthemum. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture 5: 7–11.

Dao T B, Nguyen P D, Do Q M ,Vu T H, Le T L, Nguyen H D and Nguyen X L. 2006. In vitro mutagenesis of chrysanthemum for breeding. Plant Mutation Reports 1: 26– 7.

Datta S K and Banerjee B K. 1995. Improvement of garden chrysanthemum through induced mutation. Flora and Fauna 1: 1–4.

Ferol R, Louis S and Luce L. 1996. Effects of gamma radiation on in vitro plantlets of Alpinia purpurata. Journal of Horticultural Science 2: 243–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1996.11515402

Gray L H. 1956. Biological damage from ionising radiations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. Geneva, Switzerland. 209–12.

Gupta M N and Datta S K. 1982. Effects of g-rays on roses: sprouting, growth and induction of somatic mutations. The Indian Rose Annual 2: 42–54.

Hagberg A and Nybom N. 1954. Reaction of potatoes to X- irradiation and radio-phosphorus. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 4: 578–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015125409439965

Jain S M. 2005. Major mutation assisted plant breeding programs supported by the FAO and IAEA. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 82: 113–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-004-7095-6

Kim G, Koh Cab C, GI Gwang Y, Choi Kyong J and SongHI S. 2006. In vitro mutant induction by irradiation of gamma-ray in Rosa hybrida Hort. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 24: 497–502.

Kumar S. 2002. Studies on in vitro mutagenesis in Rose (Rosa hybrida L.). Ph D thesis, CCS University, Meerut.

Nonomura T, Ikegami Y, Morikawa Y, Matsuda Y and Totoda H. 2001. Induction of morphologically changed petals from mutagen-treated apical buds of rose and plant regeneration from varied petal-derived calli. Plant Biotechnology 18: 233– 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.18.233

Reddy M L and Bhalla J K. 1994. Estimation of peroxidase in mutants of perennial Portulaca grandiflora. Advances in Plant Sciences 7: 394–6.

Senapati S K and Rout G R. 2008. Mutagenesis in rose: Early selection through molecular marker. Indian Journal of Horticulture 65: 452–60.

Singh K P, Singh B, Raghava S P S and Kalia C S. 2000. Induced flower colour mutations in carnation through in vitro application of chemical mutagen, Indian Journal of Genetics 60: 535–9.

Singh K P, Singh B, Raghava S P S, Misra R L and Kalia C S. 1999. In vitro induction of mutation in carnation through g- irradiation. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture 2: 107–10.

Singh V P and Sharma R. 1993. -Rays and EMS induce leaf mutants in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Current Science 65: 636–8.

Sudhir K, Prasad K V and Choudhary M L. 2006. Detection of genetic variability among chrysanthemum radiomutants using RAPD markers. Current Science 90: 1 108–13.

Walther F. 1986. In vitro mutagenesis in rose. Acta Horticulturae 189: 37–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1986.189.4

Yamaguchi H, Shimizu A, Degi K and Morishita T. 2008. Effects of dose and dose rate of gamma-ray irradiation on mutation induction and nuclear DNA content in chrysanthemum. Breeding Science 58: 331–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.58.331

Downloads

Submitted

2016-01-22

Published

2016-01-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BALA, M., & SINGH, K. P. (2016). Gamma irradiation of in-vitro proliferated cultures of rose (Rosa hybrida) for induction of novel mutants. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 86(1), 137–42. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i1.55253
Citation