Productivity and suitability assessment of orange (Citrus reticulata)- growing soils in Nagpur


537 / 171

Authors

  • CHETNA K LIKHAR NBSSLUP, Nagpur
  • JAGDISH PRASAD NBSSLUP, Nagpur

Keywords:

Orange-growing soils, Parent materials, Productivity, Suitability

Abstract

Six pedons were evaluated for their productivity and suitability on the basis of variation in physiography, parent materials, soils and productivity of oranges in Nagpur district of Maharashtra. The pedons were shallow underlain by saprolite (P3, P4 and P5) and deep (P1, P2 and P6) classified as Vertisols (P1 and P2), Inceptisols (P3 and P6) and Alfisols (P4 and P5). In general, sand, silt and clay contents ranged from 0.6 to 46.1, 19.3 to 40.0 and 24.1 to 68.2% in different horizons, respectively. The soils were moderately acidic to moderately alkaline in reaction associated with sodicity in sub-soils (P1 and P6). The CEC varied from 18.3 to 59.3 cmol (p+)/kg. The available N, P and K ranged from 50.2 to 250.9, 0.8 to 27.7 and 252.0 to 1 030.4 kg/ha, respectively in different pedons. The Riquier productivity index appears to be more reliable as compared to Storie index and these ratings are not in reliance with the Sys and proposed suitability criteria and yield of oranges realized. On computation of the existing limitations, a new criterion has been proposed (against Sys suitability criteria for Citrus spp) which indicated that P3, P4 and P5 were moderately suitable and others were marginally suitable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • CHETNA K LIKHAR, NBSSLUP, Nagpur

    Junior Research Fellow

  • JAGDISH PRASAD, NBSSLUP, Nagpur
    Principal Scientist

References

Dhale S A and Jagdish Prasad. 2009. Characterization and

classification of sweet orange-growing soils of Jalna district,

Maharashtra. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 57(1): 11–7.

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis-Advanced Course, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Washington.

Jackson M L. 1979. Soil Chemical Analysis-Advanced Course, 2nd edn, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Jagdish Prasad, Nagaraju M S S, Srivastava R, Ray S K and

Chandran P. 2001. Characteristics and classification of some

orange growing soils in Nagpur district of Maharashtra. Journal June 2011] PRODUCTIVITY AND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ORANGE GROWING SOILS 505

of the Indian Society of Soil Science 49(1): 735–9.

Lindsay W L and Norvell W A. 1978. Development of DTPA soilvtest for Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu. Soil Science Society American Journal 42: 421–7.

Lingade S R, Srivastava R, Jagdish Prasad and Saxena R K. 2008. Occurrence of sodic Vertisols in Nagpur district, Maharashtra. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 56(1): 231–2.

Nikam M S, Patil N G, Jagdish Prasad and Srivastava R. 2006. Water retention characteristics of shallow soils of basaltic origin in Nagpur district. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 34(3):229–32.

Pal D K, Bhattacharyya T, Ray S K, Chandran P, Srivastava P, Durge S L and Bhuse S R. 2006. Significance of soil modifiers (Ca-zeolites and gypsum) in naturally degraded Vertisols of the Peninsular India in redefining the sodic soils. Geoderma 136:210–8.

Piper C S. 1950. Soil and Plant Analysis, 368 pp. Interscience publisher, Inc. New York.

Richard L A. 1965. Physical condition of water in soil. (in) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I. Black C A (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis. Agronomy 9: 128–51.

Riquier J, Bramao D L and Comet J P. 1970. A new system of appraisal in terms of actual and potential productivity. FAO Soil Resources, Development and Conservation Services, Land and Water Development Division, FAO, Rome, Italy.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 2000. Soil Survey Manual (Indian print), USDA Handbook No. 18, US government printing office, Washington, DC.

Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 10th edn, USDA, Natural Resources conservation Service, Washington, DC.

Srivastava A K, Shyam Singh and Tiwari K N. 2007. Diagnostic tools for citrus: their use and implications in India. Better crops, pp 26–9.

Srivastava A K and Singh Shyam. 2008. Citrus nutrition research in India: Current status and future strategies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 78(1): 3–16.

Storie R and Earl. 1978. Storie Index Soil Rating, Special

Publication, 3203, Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, USA.

Sys Ir C, E Van Kanst, Debaveye J and Beernaert F. 1993. Land evaluation crop requirements. Agricultural Publication No. 7, Part III, General, FAO, Rome, Italy.

Watanabe F S. and Olsen S R. 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Science Society American Proceedings 29: 677–8.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LIKHAR, C. K., & PRASAD, J. (2011). Productivity and suitability assessment of orange (Citrus reticulata)- growing soils in Nagpur. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 81(6). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAgS/article/view/6569