Regeneration status of bhojpatra (Betula utilis) forest in north western Himalayas of Kashmir valley, India

NASEER A MIR; T H MASOODI; SYED MAQBOOL GEELANI; AKHLAQ AMIN WANI; P A SOFI

doi:10.56093/ijas.v87i7.71836

Authors

NASEER A MIR
T H MASOODI
SYED MAQBOOL GEELANI
AKHLAQ AMIN WANI
P A SOFI

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i7.71836

Keywords:

Betula utilis, Density-diameter, Regeneration status, Sindh forest division, Tangmarg forest division

Abstract

The regeneration status of bhojpatra or Himalayan birch (Betula utilis D. Don) was assessed in the two forest divisions of Kashmir with the major focus on regeneration status pertaining to the poor recruitment and seedling establishment in north western Himalayas along the different altitudinal gradient. The regeneration in both the forest divisions was poor and decreased further with increasing altitude but did not show any definite trend along the altitudinal gradient. Density-diameter and regeneration success curve for Betula utilis was not continuous and displayed typical reverse J-shaped structure depicting un-sustainable regeneration success along the altitude. Density of recruits was greater than the density of seedlings (un-established regeneration) indicating anthropogenic interference in terms of grazing and lopping of mature trees for fodder and other uses. The overall regeneration successes varied between 3.38-10.95% on south eastern aspect and 4.47 to 11.16% on south western aspect in Sindh forest division and between 4.84-11.53% in Tangmarg forest division. The diversity index (H/) Betula utilis decreased within the upper diameter classes with maximum diversity in lower diameter (0-25 cm). The correlation between soil parameters, viz. pH, EC, carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus depicted the significant positive as well as negative trends with regeneration parameters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

NASEER A MIR

Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST of Kashmir, Benkama, Ganderbal, Jammu and Kashmir 191 201.
T H MASOODI

Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST of Kashmir, Benkama, Ganderbal, Jammu and Kashmir 191 201.
SYED MAQBOOL GEELANI

Devision of Environmental Science, Sri Pratap Singh
College, Srinagar, J & K 190021.
AKHLAQ AMIN WANI

Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST of Kashmir, Benkama, Ganderbal, Jammu and Kashmir 191 201.
P A SOFI

Faculty of Forestry, SKUAST of Kashmir, Benkama, Ganderbal, Jammu and Kashmir 191 201.

References

Binkley D and Giardina C. 1998. Why do species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interaction. Biogeochemistry 42(2): 89–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005948126251

Carlton G C and Bazzaz F A. 1998. Regeneration of three sympatric birch species on experimental hurricane blowdown microsites. Ecological Monographs 68: 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0099:ROTSBS]2.0.CO;2

Cavaliere C. 2009. The effect of climate change on medicinal and aromatic plants. Herbal Gram 81: 44–57.

Chacko V J 1965. A manual of sampling technique for forest surveys. Manager Publications, Delhi, p 172.

Cote L, Brown S, Pare D, Fyles J and Bauhus J. 2000. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixed wood. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32(8-9): 1 079–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00017-1

Gairola S, Rawal R S and Todaria N P. 2008. Forest vegetation patterns along an altitudinal gradient in sub-alpine zone of west Himalaya, India. African Journal of Plant Science 2(6): 42–8.

Gairola S, Sharma C M and Ghildiyal S K. 2012. Chemical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of Garhwal Himalaya. Environmentalist 7: 212–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2011.597109

Glatzel G. 2009. Mountain forests in a changing World- an Epilogue. Mountain Research and Development 29: 188–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.1114

Grime J P. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Process, and Ecosystem Properties, p 51 Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.

Gupta M K and Sharma S D. 2008. Effect of tree plantation on soil properties, profile morphology and productivity index I. Poplar in Uttarakhand. Annals of Forest 16(2): 209–24.

Jackson M L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis, p 498. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Jha M N, Gupta M K and Dimri B M. 2002. Impact of changing natural forest cover and site conditions on the soil resources in western Himalayan region. (In) Natural Resources of Western Himalaya, pp 23–42. Pandit Ashok K (Ed). Valley Book House, Srinagar.

Khan M, Rai J P N and Tripathi R S. 1987. Population structure of some tree species in disturbed and protected sub tropical forests of northeast India. Acta Ecology 8: 247–55.

Krauchi N, Brang P and Schonenberger W. 2000. Forests of mountainous regions: Gaps in knowledge and research needs. Forest Ecology and Management 132: 73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00382-0

Lanker U, Malik A R, Gupta N K and Butola J S. 2010. Natural regeneration status of the endangered medicinal plant, Taxus baccata Hook. F. syn. T. wallichiana, in northwest Himalaya. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 6(1–2): 20–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2010.527302

Maren I E and Vetaas O R. 2007. Does regulated land use allow regeneration of keystone forest species in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Central Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development 27: 345–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.0893

Mir N A, Masoodi T H, Mir A A, Khan H, Sofi P A, Wani F J and Hameed O B. 2016. Phenology and growth performance of Himalayan birch (Betula utilis) in Kashmir Western Himalayas along the different altitudinal gradients. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86 (8): 1 086–91.

Misra R. 1968. Ecology Work Book, pp 131-3. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, Kolkata.

Mori A and Takeda H. 2004. Effects of undisturbed canopy structure on population structure and species coexistence in an old-growth subalpine forest in central Japan. Forest Ecology and Management 200: 89–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.036

Murthy I K, Murali K S, Hegde G T, Bhat P R and Ravindranath N H. 2002. A comparative analysis of regeneration in natural forest and joint forest management plantations in Uttara Kannada Dist.,Western Ghats. Current Science 83: 1 358–64.

Peterson C J and Pickett S T A. 2000. Patch type influences on regeneration in a western Pennsylvania, USA, catastrophic windthrow. Oikos 90: 489–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900307.x

Prasad P R C, Reddy C S and Dutt C B S. 2007. Phytodiversity assessment of tropical rainforest of north Andaman Islands, India. Jornal of Forestry 1(1): 27–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/rjf.2007.27.39

Rikhari H C, Sharma S, Nadeem M and Palni L M S. 2000. Himalayan yew: stand structure, canopy damage, regeneration and conservation strategy. Environmental Conservation 25(4): 334–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892998000411

Shamet G S and Gupta N K 2005. Survey, regeneration and planting studies in yew (Taxus baccata): an endangered medicinal species of Himalaya. Report of National Medicinal Plant Board, GOI, p 25.

Shrestha B B, Ghimire B, Lekhak H D and Jha P K. 2007. Regeneration of treeline birch (Betula utilis D. Don) forest in a trans-Himalayan dry valley in Central Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 27(3): 259–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/mrdd.0784

Singh JS and Singh SP. 1992. Forests of Himalaya: Structure, Functioning and impact of man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India.

Singh V, Bhagat S, Arya S R. 1987. Litter fall and natural regeneration of spruce and silver fir. Indian Forester 113(9): 616–21.

Subedi M N and Shakya P R. 1999. Productions dynamics, conservation and management implications of Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. forest on Mount Phulchoki, Central Nepal. Indian Journal of Ecology 26: 97–106.

Thadani R and Ashton P M S. 1995. Regeneration of banj oak (Quercus leuchotrichophora A. Camus) in the Central Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management 78: 217–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03561-4

Timilsina N, Ross M S and Heinen J T. 2007. A community analysis of sal (Shorea robusta) forests in the western Terai of Nepal. Forest Ecology and Management 241: 223–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.012

Vanhatalo V, Leinonen K, Rita H and Nygren M. 1996. Effect of prechilling on the dormancy of Betula pendula seeds. Canadian Journal Forest Research 26: 1203–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x26-134

Wadia D N. 1953. op. cit., pp. 363-65, a Kosi Dam Project, Preliminary Report, CW1NC 1953, Delhi, p 22.

Wagner S, Walder K, Ribbens E and Zeibig A. 2004. Directionality in fruit dispersal models for anemochorous forest trees. Ecological Modellinh 179: 487–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.02.020

Wolfe C B and Pittillo J D. 1977. Some ecological factors influencing the distribution of Betula nigra L. in western north Carolina. Castanea 42: 18–30.