Diversity analysis of guava (Psidium guajava) germplasm collection


645 / 282

Authors

  • SHAILI KUMARI Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, School of Horticulture Science, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • NAGARAJA ARUMUGAM Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, School of Horticulture Science, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • RAKESH SINGH Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources New Delhi
  • MANISH SRIVASTAV Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, School of Horticulture Science, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • SHIVA BANOTH Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, School of Horticulture Science, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • AMITHA CHARU MITHRA Division of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ICAR-National Research Center on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi
  • ARUN M B Division of Seed Science and Technology, School of Crop Improvement, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi 110 012
  • AMIT KUMAR GOSWAMI Division of Fruits and Horticultural Technology, School of Horticulture Science, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi
  • YASIN JESHIMA KHAN Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78740

Keywords:

Characterization, Correlation, Diversity analysis, Morphological traits, Psidium guajava, Simple Sequence Repeats

Abstract

Guava (Psidium guajava L.) is one of the commercially important cultivated fruit crops in India. Guava ranks fifth
in production share of fruit crops in the country. During 2014-15, India produced 36.68 lakh tonnes of guava from an
area of 2.68 lakh ha with 13.7 t/ha productivity. In the present investigation, a total 33 genotypes including 6 species
of Psidium and 28 genotypes of Psidium guajava were characterized using 39 SSR markers. All accessions are being
cultivated at IARI research farm, Pusa campus, New Delhi. Samples were collected from research farm to determine
the overall diversity and to assess the similarity among genotypes using molecular markers. Out of 39 primers 26
were reproducible. A total of 64 alleles were produced by 26 primers and number of alleles per locus varied
from 1 (mPgCIR01, mPgCIR18 and mPgCIR19) to 5 (mPgCIR256) with mean value of 2.34. Gene diversity ranged
from 0.0377 to 0.6681 with a mean value of 0.2766. Highest gene diversity was observed for primer mPgCIR256
(0.6681) and lowest for primer mPgCIR24 (0.0377). SSR primer mPgCIR256 was most informative with high rate
of polymorphism as well as number of alleles. Phenotypic correlation indicated the correlated traits with dependent
yield trait. PCA and cluster analysis showed a significant phenotypic and genetic diversity among existing cultivars.
All accessions were grouped into two major groups and under each group four sub groups. Maximum diversity was
found in leaf traits, viz. leaf length, leaf breadth, petiole and petiole length. Genetic distance and the dissimilarity matrix
showed three major clusters on the basis of genetic similarity. All these accessions were grouped in to three clusters,
viz. A, B and C. While cluster A includes only cultivars, cluster B includes all species except P. friedrichsthalianum.
This indicates that, the diversity among and between species is at cluster level. Genetic diversity analysis among
Psidium species showed that P. guajava had more similarity with Psidium guienensis compared to other species.
Present investigation indicated the presence of substantial diversity among guava species which can be utilized for
future guava improvement programmes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelica M N, Jose H S G, Erica M, Adesio F and Marcia F S F. 2012. Discriminant analysis of wild guava tree by morphological descriptors and microsatellites. (In) Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Guava and Other Myrtaceae, held at Petrolina PE, Brazil.

Babu R, Nair S K, Prasanna B M and Gupta H S. 2004. Integrating marker-assisted selection in crop breeding prospects and challenges. Current Science 87: 607–19.

Botstein D, White R L, Skolnick M and Davis R W. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 314–31.

Doyle J J and Doyle J L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–5.

Finger and Klank. 2010. Molecular methods: Blessing or curse. Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology, pp 309–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92160-8_18

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

Kanupriya , Latha P M, Aswath C, Reddy L, Padmakar B, Vasugi C and Dinesh M R. 2011. Cultivar identification and genetic fingerprinting of guava Psidium guajava L. using microsatellite markers. International Journal of Fruit Science 11: 184–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2011.578521

Lee M and Phillips R L.1988. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39: 413–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.39.060188.002213

Mehmooda A, Jaskania M J, Khana I A, Ahmadb S R, Luoc S and Ahmad N M. 2014. Genetic diversity of Pakistani guava (Psidium guajava L.) germplasm and its implications for conservation and breeding, Scientia Horticulturae 172: 221–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.04.005

Menzel C M. 1985. Guava: an exotic fruit with potential in Queensland. Queensland Agriculture Journal 111: 93–8.

Morand S, Simkova A, Matejusova I, Plaisance L, Verneau O and Desdevises Y. 2002. Investigating patterns may reveal processes: evolutionary ecology of ectoparasitic monogeneans. International Journal for Parasitology 32: 111–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00347-2

Nakasone H Y and Paul R E .1998. Tropical fruits. CAB Queensland Agric. J. III: 93–8.

National Horticulture Board. 2014. Indian Horticulture Database. Gurgoan, India. http://www.nhb.com.

Pandey P, Kumar R, Mishra D S, Jeena A S and Kumar J. 2017. Morphological and molecular characterization of guava. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5(4): 533–8.

Prakash D P, Narayanaswamy P and Sondur S N. 2002. Analysis of molecular diversity inguava using RAPD markers. Jounal of Horticulture Science and Biotechnology 77: 287–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2002.11511494

Risterucci A M, Duval M F, Rohde W and Billotte N. 2005. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from Psidium guajava L. Molecular and Ecology, 5: 745–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01050.x

SAS 9.3 software. 2011. SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Sharma Y K, Goswami A M and Sharma R R. 1992. Effect of dwarfing aneuploid guava rootstock in high density orcharding. Indian Journal of Horticulture 49: 31–6.

Shiva B, Nagaraja A, Srivastav M, Kumari S, Goswami A K, Singh R and Arun M B. 2016. Characterization of guava (Psidium guajava) germplasm based on leaf and fruit parameters. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(5): 634–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70172

Valdes I , Rodriguez J, Becker N N, Velazquez D, Sourd B, Espinosa D, Rohde G W., 2007. Microsatellite characterization of guava Psidium guajava L. germplasm collection in Cuba. Cultivos Tropicales 28: 61–7.

Viji G, Harris D L, Yadav A K and Zee FT. 2010. Use of microsatellite markers to characterize genetic diversity of selected accessions of guava Psidium guajava L. in the United States. Acta Horticulturae 859: 169–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.859.20

Zeid M, Schon C and Link W. 2003. Genetic diversity in recent elite faba bean lines using AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 1304–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1350-9

Downloads

Submitted

2018-04-11

Published

2023-03-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMARI, S., ARUMUGAM, N., SINGH, R., SRIVASTAV, M., BANOTH, S., MITHRA, A. C., B, A. M., GOSWAMI, A. K., & KHAN, Y. J. (2023). Diversity analysis of guava (Psidium guajava) germplasm collection. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(3), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78740
Citation