Performance of apricot (Prunus armeniaca) genotypes for growth, yield and quality parameters in temperate ecosystem of Himachal Pradesh


527 / 151

Authors

  • A K SHUKLA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station (CHC), Amartara Cottage, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 004
  • K K PRAMANICK Principal Scientist and Head, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station (CHC), Amartara Cottage, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 004
  • SANTOSH WATPADE Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station (CHC), Amartara Cottage, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 004
  • J KUMAR Director, ICAR-NIBSM, Raipur

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i7.81594

Keywords:

Apricot, Flowering, Genotypes, Growth, Performance, Quality, Yield.

Abstract

Studies were carried out to assess the performance of fifteen apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes for growth, yield and quality characters in temperate region of Himachal Pradesh. Based on observations during 2013 to 2016 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station, Shimla tree height varied from 2.16-5.75 m, tree girth varied from 30.5-98.5 cm with maximum in Charmagaz (98.5 cm) and minimum in Nugget (30.5 cm). Canopy spread in East-West direction varied from 2.13-7.0 m with the maximum in Charmagaz (7.0m) and minimum in Harcot (2.13m). Canopy spread in North-South direction was also maximum in Charmagaz (6.80m). Plant dormancy varies from 129-154 days in different genotypes of apricot. Highest fruit set was recorded in EC-168342 (46.32%) and minimum found in Harcot (11.78%). The fruit weight was maximum in EC-168342 (86.56 g) and minimum in Nugget (20.07 g). Pulp weight was also recorded maximum in EC-168342 (82.44 g) and minimum in Nugget (17.74g). Fruit size (L×B) was highest in EC-168342 (5.39 cm × 5.16 cm). The stone weight in different genotypes varied from 2.33-4.52g with maximum in EC-232328 (4.52g) and minimum in Nugget (2.33g). Fruit yield varied from 5.31-26.13 t/ha with maximum in EC-168342 (26.13 t/ha) and minimum in Nugget (5.31 t/ha). Dry matter content varied from 18.01%- 26.66% with maximum in New Castle (26.66%). Pulp thickness was recorded maximum in Suffaida Oblonga (12.2 mm) and minimum observed in New Castle (6.32 mm). Total soluble solids (TSS) was recorded maximum in Charmagaz (18.31%) and minimum in Harcot (12.83%). Acidity in fruit was recorded highest in EC-168342 (2.01%) and minimum in Nari Kinnaur (0.98%). The highest reducing sugar was observed in Nari Kinnaur (7.21%) with minimum was recorded in EC-232328 (3.16%). Non-reducing sugar varied from 4.52%-9.24% with maximum in Castle (9.24%). Vitamin-C content was significantly higher in EC-168342 (17.16 mg/100 g) and minimum in Shipley Early (11.98 mg/100 g).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 1998. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.

Bhat M Y, Padder B A, Wani I A, Banday F A, Ahsan Hafiza, Dar M A and Lone A A. 2013. Evaluation of apricot cultivars based on physic-chemical characteristics observed under temperate conditions. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(5): 535–7.

Ghorpade V M , Hanna M A and Kadam S S. 1995. Apricot. (In) Handbook of Fruit Science and Technology. Salunkhe D K and Kadam S S (Eds). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

Kumar D, Singh D B, Srivastava K K, Singh S R and Zargar K A. 2016. Performance of apricot varieties/genotypes in north-western himalayan region of India. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 14(2): 107–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v14i2.31249

Pathak R K. 2003. Status Report on Genetic Resources of Indian Gooseberry (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) in South and South East Asia, IPGRI Office for South Asia. National Agriculture Science Centre (NASC). Pusa campus, New Delhi. pp 1–210

Padder B A, Bhat M Y, Wani W M, Wani S A, Wani S H, Zahoor S, Qureshi I, Sheikh M A, Rather S A and Raja W H. 2017. Average daily gain in physico-chemical characteristics and yield efficiency of some apricot cultivars grown in himalayan temperate region. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(8): 2915–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.349

Rodrigo J and Herrero M. 2002. Effects of pre-blossom temperatures on flower development and fruit set in apricot Scientia Horticulturae 92(2 ) : 125–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00289-8

Raj D, Sharma P C and Sharera S K. 2015. Studies on Osmo-air dehydration of different Indian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Science Technology 52(6): 3794–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1443-2

Salunkhe D K, Deshpande P B, Do S Y. 1968. Effects of maturity and storage on physical and biochemical changes in peach and apricot fruits. Journal of Horticultural Science 43: 235–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1968.11514250

Saroj P L, More T A and Singh U V. 2008. Performance of bael cultivars under hot arid ecosystem of Rajasthan. Indian Journal Agriultural Sciences 78(12):1071–4.

Sharma D P, Sharma N, Bawa R and Rajesh K. 2005. Potential of apricot growing in the arid-cold desert region of North-Western Himalayas. Acta Horticulturae 696: 61–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.696.9

Sharma K D, Kumar R and Kaushal B B. 2004. Mass transfer characteristics, yield and quality of five varieties of osmotically dehydrated apricot. Journal of Food Science and Technology 41: 264–75.

Shukla Arun K, Singh D and Shukla Anil K. 2009. Performance of aonla cultivars under arid region of India. Indian Journal Agricultural Sciences 79 (11): 849–52.

Shukla A K, Pramanick K K, Watpade S G, Verma J and Kumar J. 2016. Performance of peach and nectarine for yield and quality traits. International Journal Tropical Agriculture 34 (6): 1811–3.

Shukla A K, Pramanick K K, Kumar Jitender, Watpade Santosh and Kumar J. 2015. Performance of Chinese gooseberry for yield and quality traits. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33(4): 3167–8.

Singh D B, Kumar D and Ahmed N. 2016. Evaluation of apricot genotypes for table use, drying and their storage life. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(4): 527–32.

Wills R H H, Scriven F M and Green H. 1983. Nutrient composition of stone fruit (Prunus spp.) cultivars: apricot, cherry, nectarine, peach and plum. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 34: 1383–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341211

Yildiz F. 1994. New technologies in apricot processing. Journal Standard, Apricot Special Issue, 67–9.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-07-19

Published

2018-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SHUKLA, A. K., PRAMANICK, K. K., WATPADE, S., & KUMAR, J. (2018). Performance of apricot (Prunus armeniaca) genotypes for growth, yield and quality parameters in temperate ecosystem of Himachal Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88(7), 1099-1103. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i7.81594
Citation