Responses of EMS on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)


456 / 241

Authors

  • AJAY KUMAR District Extension Specialist, Vegetable, University Seed Farm, Usman (Tarn Taran)
  • T S DHILLON Associate Director, Seeds, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i2.99051

Keywords:

Ethyl methane sulphonate, French bean, Heat tolerance, Mutation frequency

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2017-18, to find out the effect of EMS on growth and yield of French bean. The germination percentage in M1 generation decreased with the increased in concentration of EMS both in laboratory and field conditions. The varieties Arka Suvidha and Falguni produced several heat tolerant mutants during February and March, sown for days to flowering, number of pods per plant and seed yield per plant. The maximum numbers of mutants were observed in lower EMS concentration (0.15%) during February and March as compared to higher EMS concentration (0.25 and 0.35%), thus application of lower concentration of EMS has been recommended for crop improvement purposes in French bean through mutation breeding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad P and Hakeem K R. 2013. Crop Improvement: New Approaches and Modern Techniques. Springer Publisher, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7028-1

Ariraman M, Gnanamurthy S, Dhanavel D, Bharathi T and Murugan S. 2014. Mutagenic effect on seed germination, seedling growth and seedling survival of pigeon pea. International Letters Nature Science 21: 41–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56431/p-g8xcn6

Datir S S, Dhumal K N and Pandey R N. 2007. Gamma radiation and EMS induced variation in seed germination and plant survival in horse gram. Journal of Arid Legumes 4: 15–17.

Dhanavel D, Pavadai P, Mullainathan L, Mohana D, Raju G, Girija M and Thilagavathi C. 2008. Effectiveness and efficiency of chemical mutagens in cowpea. African Journal of Biotechnology 7: 4116–17.

Kashid N G. 2013. Mutagenic Effect of Ethyl Methane Sulphonate and Sodium Azide on Pod Characters in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Science and Research 5: 1535–37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/v5i2.NOV161525

Kashid N G and More S B. 2016. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of Ethyl methane sulphonate and Sodium azide in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences 3: 64–68

Kavithamani D A, Kalamani C Vanniarajan and Uma D. 2008. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays and EMS in soybean. Madras Agricultural Journal 95: 448–51

Kulkarni G B and Mogle U P. 2013. Effects of mutagen on chlorophyll mutation in horse gram. Bioscience Discovery 4: 214–19.

Mangaiyarkarasi R, Girija M and Gnanamurthy S. 2014. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate in Catharanthus roseus. International Journal of Current Microbial Applied Science 3: 881–89.

More A D and Borkar A T. 2016. Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays and EMS in Phaseolus vulgaris L. International Journal of Current Microbial Applied Science 5: 544–54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.510.061

Patial M, Thakur S R and Singh K P. 2015. Comparative mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of physical and chemical mutagen and induced variability in rice bean (Vigna umbellate Thunb, Ohwi and Ohashi). Legume Research 38: 30–36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00005.3

Satpute R A and Fultambkar R V. 2012. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays and EMS in soybean (Glycine max L.). Current Botany 3: 18–20

Tulmenneto A. 1990. Genetic improvement of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) through mutation breeding. Genetic Improvement of Pulse crops 7: 296–27.

Downloads

Submitted

2020-03-16

Published

2020-03-16

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

KUMAR, A., & DHILLON, T. S. (2020). Responses of EMS on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(2), 436-438. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i2.99051
Citation