Impact Assessment of Floating and Alternative Feeds (Wolffia globosa) for Fish Rearing Technologies in Tripura, India


52 / 43

Authors

  • Lajit Kumar Sharma Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Biswajit Lahiri Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-3028
  • Yumlembam Jackie Singh Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Gusheinzed Waikhom Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Pradyut Biswas Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Hoilenting Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • S. T. Pavan Kumar Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Abhay Kumar Chandegara Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Martina Meinam Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61419

Keywords:

Aquaculture, Alternative feed, Floating feed, Impact assessment, Wolffia

Abstract

The study assessed the social, economic, and environmental impacts of floating feed– and Wolffia-based fish rearing technologies disseminated by the College of Fisheries, CAU (Imphal), Lembucherra, Tripura. An after-only design was employed with 140 respondents: 100 floating feed adopters chosen through simple random sampling and 40 Wolffia adopters through complete enumeration. Impact indicators across social, economic, and environmental domains were developed using SMART criteria, expert-validated, and analysed with the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, paired t-tests, and Spearman’s correlation. Floating feed adoption improved production (+16.75 kg cycle⁻¹), net returns (+Rs. 6,644.26), and feed efficiency [Apparent feed conversion ratio (AFCR) –0.23], raising the Economic Impact Score from 32.93 to 40.23 (p = 0.000). Social participation, awareness, and income increased, while the Environmental Impact Score fell from 23.996 to 19.146, reflecting improved water quality. Wolffia adoption also enhanced production (+18.48 kg cycle⁻¹), returns (+Rs. 4,804.35), and AFCR (–0.25), contributing to livelihoods, nutrition, and climate-resilient aquaculture. Major constraints included high floating feed price, supplier dependence, flood-induced losses, and weak extension support. Overall, both technologies boosted aquaculture productivity, profitability, and sustainability, highlighting the need for technical services, training, and institutional support.

Author Biographies

  • Lajit Kumar Sharma, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    PG Scholar, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • Biswajit Lahiri, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
    Professor, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India
  • Yumlembam Jackie Singh, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    Assistant Professor, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • Gusheinzed Waikhom, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    Professor, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • Pradyut Biswas, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    Associate Professor, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • Hoilenting, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    Assistant Professor, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • S. T. Pavan Kumar, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    Assistant Professor, Department of Basic Sciences, College of Community Science, Sangsanggre, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • Abhay Kumar Chandegara, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    PhD Scholar, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

  • Martina Meinam, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

    PhD Scholar, College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India

References

Abdelhamid, A. M., Salem, M. F. y El-Sh. Ramadan, M. (2019). Comparison between effects of sinking and floating diets on growth performance of the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 23(2), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2019.31849

Appenroth, K. J., Sree, K. S., Böhm, V., Hammann, S., Vetter, W., Leiterer, M. & Jahreis, G. (2017). Nutritional value of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) as human food. Food Chemistry, 217, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.116

Belton, B. &Little, D. C. (2011). Immanent and interventionist inland Asian aquaculture development and its outcomes. Development Policy Review, 29(4), 459-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00542.x

Biswas, P., Lahiri, B., Singh, S.K., Shil, B., Chakraborty, R., & S.T. Pavan Kumar. (2025). Water Resources and Fisheries Production Dynamics for Development of the Fisheries in Sepahijala District of Tripura, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61101

Das, A. (2012). An Economic Evaluation of Aqua-model Village Scheme of Tripura. M. F. Sc (Dissertation). Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, India.

Das, A., Kumar, N. R., Krishnan, M., Yadav, V. K. and Immanuel, S. (2014). Adoption of Improved Aquaculture Technologies in Tripura, India. Fishery Technology, 51(1), 58-63.

Das, K. C., Toppo, S., Mohanty, T., Pradhan, C., Mohanta, K. N. & Giri, S. S. (2016). Cost-effective floating feeds for Indian Major Carps (IMC) by replacement of soybean meal with alternative feed ingredients. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 50(4), 526-528. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.7090

Debnath, B. (2011). An Economic Analysis of Fish Production and Demand in Tripura State, India. PhD (Thesis). Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, India.

DES, Govt. of Tripura (2024) Annual Report 2024. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Planning (Statistics) Department, Govt. of Tripura, India.

DoF (2011). Annual fish production report 2010-11, Department of Fisheries, Government of Tripura.

Doran, G. T. (1981). There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35-36.

Edwards, P. (2015). Aquaculture environment interactions: Past, present and likely future trends. Aquaculture, 447, 2-14.

Garlock, T. M., Asche, F., Anderson, J. L., Eggert, H., Anderson, T. M., Che, B., ... & Tveteras, R. (2024). Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: the aquaculture performance indicators. Nature Communications, 15(1), 5274.

Joffre, O. M., Klerkx, L., Dickson, M. W. & Verdegem, M. C. J. (2017). How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action. Aquaculture, 470, 129-148.

Kawarazuka, N. & Béné, C. (2011). The potential role of small fish species in improving micronutrient deficiencies in developing countries: Building evidence. Public Health Nutrition, 14(11), 1927-1938.

Kumar, G., Engle, C. R., & Tucker, C. (2018). Factors driving aquaculture technology adoption. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 22(2), 178-199.

Lahiri, B., Kurmi, R. K., Singh, S. K., Ghosh, A., Pal, P., Pavan Kumar, S. T., Nirmalkar, C., & Debnath, A. (2024). Determinants of digitised farm information outreach in aquaculture: A case of mobile phone application for smallholder fish farmers in north east India. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02471-1

Little, D. C., Newton, R. W. & Beveridge, M. C. M. (2016). Aquaculture: a rapidly growing and significant source of sustainable food? Status, transitions and potential. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 75(3), 274-286.

Mandal, R. N., Chattopadhyay, D. N., Paul, B. N. & Mukhopadhyay, P. K. (2012). The duck weed (Wolffia arrhiza) as feed ingredient for nursery rearing of Labeo rohita and Labeo calbasu. Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 42(2), 21-27.

Meinam, M., Lahiri, B., Ghosh, A., Singh, S. K., Bharati, H., Upadhyay, A. D., Pal, P., Sanjenbam, B., & Ngasotter, S. (2025). Aquatic ecosystem, fish diversity and conservation strategies of the fragile Eastern Himalayas: A comprehensive review with a focus on Loktak Lake. Wetlands, 45, 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-025-01978-w

Nath, K., Munilkumar, S., Patel, A. B., Kamilya, D., Pandey, P. K., & Sawant, P. B. (2021). Lamellidens and Wolffia canopy improves growth, feed utilization and welfare of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) in integrated multi-trophic freshwater aquaculture system. Aquaculture, 534, 2-7.

Ng, W. K. & Romano, N. (2013). A review of the nutrition and feeding management of farmed tilapia. Reviews in Aquaculture, 5(4), 220-254.

Niangti, W., Singh, Y. J., Lahiri, B., Upadhyay, A. D., Pal, P., Meinam, M., Huirem, B., & Monsang, M. W. (2025). Training Needs of Fish Farmers for the Development of Fisheries and Aquaculture in Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61209

Nilanjan Rej, Shyam Sundar Dana, Abdul Hannan Mondal, Moumita Ray Sarkar, Dipam Ray, Arif Ahammed, & Ritika Karjee. (2025). Aquaculture Practices and Knowledge Level of Fish Farmers in Purulia District of West Bengal. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(3), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61302

Nirmalkar, C., Lahiri, B., Ghsoh, A., Pal, P., Baidya, S., Shil, B., & Kurmi, R. K. (2022). Perceived knowledge and attitude of fisheries extension professionals on usage of ICTs in Tripura. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 58(2), 58-64

Noor, M. A., Fiaz, S., Nawaz, A., & Nawaz, M. M. (2018). The effects of cutting interval on agro-qualitative traits of different millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) cultivars. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(3), 317-322.

Reed, M. S., Ferré, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Blanche, R., Lawford-Rolfe, R., Dallimer, M., & Holden, J. (2021). Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework. Research Policy, 50(4), 104147.

Saha, R. K., Sastry, E. V. D., Haldhar, S.M. & Singh, M.P. (2020). Inventory of CAU Technologies for NEH Region. Pub. DEE, CAU, Imphal.

Sajeev, M. V., Ramesha, T. J., Chethan, N., & Gopika, R. (2023). Factors influencing fish purchase and consumption behaviour of Koraga and Soliga tribes, Karnataka, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 86-90. http://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59418

Downloads

Submitted

09.09.2025

Published

30.09.2025

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.

How to Cite

Sharma, L. K., Lahiri, B., Singh, Y. J., Waikhom, G., Biswas, P., Hoilenting, S. T., P. K., Chandegara, A. K., & Meinam, M. (2025). Impact Assessment of Floating and Alternative Feeds (Wolffia globosa) for Fish Rearing Technologies in Tripura, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(4), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61419
Citation