Weather-Based Prediction of Sorghum Yield in Hamirpur District


16

Authors

  • Ritu Singh Department of Agricultural Engineering, IAS, BHU, Varanasi-221005 (U.P.), India
  • Gaurav Shukla Department of Statistics & Computer Science, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001
  • Umesh Chandra Department of Statistics & Computer Science, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001
  • Shivangi Jayaswal Department of Statistics, University of Lucknow- 226 007, India
  • Arjun Prasad Verma verma Department of Agricultural Extension, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001
  • Annu Department of Basic & Social Science, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001
  • Himani Maheshwari School of Computing, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun (UK)-248002

https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62417

Keywords:

Yield, PCA, ANN, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, Weather Variables

Abstract

The study was conducted during 2024-25. Five multivariable models were tested for the sorghum yield prediction in Hamirpur district of the Bundelkhand region, India namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN), PCA with Artificial Neural Network (PCA-ANN), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Ridge Regression, and Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression (SMLR). Average meteorological data of different crop phenological stages were used as predictor variables to build the models. The coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to evaluate the model's performance. The five models were compared, and the PCA-ANN model was found to have the highest prediction accuracy, suggesting the dimensionality reduction process of PCA improved predictive ability of the ANN model. The PCA-ANN model had the highest predictive performance, with low prediction errors (MAE = 0.33 q ha⁻¹ and RMSE = 0.50 q ha⁻¹) during the calibration process. The evaluation metrics ranked the forecasting performance of the models in the order: PCA-ANN>ANN>SMLR>LASSO>Ridge Regression. PCA, along with ANN, has emerged as a powerful and reliable technique for sorghum yield prediction under the influence of changing climate and can prove useful for farmers in the region of Bundelkhand for decision support.

Author Biographies

  • Ritu Singh, Department of Agricultural Engineering, IAS, BHU, Varanasi-221005 (U.P.), India

    Ph.D. Research Scholar

  • Gaurav Shukla, Department of Statistics & Computer Science, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001

    Assistant Professor

  • Umesh Chandra, Department of Statistics & Computer Science, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001

    Assistant Professor

  • Shivangi Jayaswal, Department of Statistics, University of Lucknow- 226 007, India

    Ph.D. Research Scholar

  • Arjun Prasad Verma verma, Department of Agricultural Extension, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001

    Assistant Professor

  • Annu, Department of Basic & Social Science, BUAT, Banda (U.P.)-210001

    Assistant Professor

  • Himani Maheshwari, School of Computing, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun (UK)-248002

    Assistant Professor

References

AAravind, K. S., Vashisth, A., Krishanan, P., & Das, B. (2022). Wheat yield prediction based on weather parameters using multiple linear, neural network and penalised regression models. Journal of Agrometeorology, 24(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i1.1002

Das, B., Murgaonkar, D., Navyashree, S., & Kumar, P. (2022). Novel Combination Artificial Neural Network Models Could Not Outperform Individual Models for Weather-Based Cashew Yield Prediction. International Journal of Biometeorology, 66, 1627–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02306-1

Garde, Y. A., Dhekale, B. S., & Singh, S. (2015). Different approaches on pre harvest forecasting of wheat yield. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(2), 839-843. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i2.693

IPAD (2024–25). Sorghum yield and production position in the world. New Delhi: Indian Production and Area Database, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

Jadhav, A., Singh, A., Chavan, S., & Goyal, A. (2025). Forecasting of area and production of sorghum in Maharashtra, India using ARIMA and ANN models. International Journal of Research in Agronomy, 8(11), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i11Sc.4244

Kalia, A., Shukla, G., Mishra, D., Mishra, B. P., & Patel, R. R. (2021). Comparative trend analysis of mustard in Bundelkhand region, Uttar Pradesh and India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(1), 15-19.

Khan, Y., & Kumar, V. (2025). Forecasting models for forewarning Soybean Yellow Mosaic Virus for Tarai Zone of Uttarakhand. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 18(02), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1828

Maurya, A. K., Rai, R. K., Gautam, Y., Ojha, P. K., Shukla, G., & Pushpa (2025). Forecasting of Gram Production in Bundelkhand Region: A Time Series Analysis Using ARIMA Model. Journal of Science Research Report, 31(9), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i93492

Pathak, D. K., Gupta, B. K., Verma, A. P., Shukla, G., Kalia, A., Mishra, D., Ojha, P. K., & Mishra, B. P.(2024).Assessing Farmers’ Awareness of Climate Change Impact: A Case of the Bundelkhand Region, India. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 60(4), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2024.60414

Ransing, D. M., Verma, A. K., Meshram, M. R., & Paikra, P. R. (2014). Nodulation, yield and thermal requirement of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes as influenced by date of sowing. International Journal of Agricultural Science, 10(2), 638-641.

Satpathi, A., Setiya, P., Das, B., Nain, A. S., Jha, P. K., Singh, S., & Singh, S. (2023). Comparative analysis of statistical and machine learning techniques for rice yield forecasting for Chhattisgarh, India. Sustainability, 15(3), 2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032786

Setiya, P., Satpathi, A., Nain, A. S., & Das, B. (2022). Comparison of weather-based wheat yield forecasting models for different districts of Uttarakhand using statistical and machine learning techniques. Journal of Agrometeorology, 24(3), 255-261. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i3.1571

Singh, M. K., Dixit, A. K., & Singh, R. R. (2018). Livelihood sources and constraints of rural households in Bundelkhand region. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 18(1), 58-65.

Singh, R., Annu, Chandra, U., Maheshwari, H, Verma, A. P., & Shukla, G. (2025). Comparative analysis of weather-driven models for sorghum yield prediction in Bundelkhand. Journal of Agrometeorology, 27 (4), 511-513. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v27i4.3151

Sridhara, S., Manoj, K. N., Gopakkali, P., Kashyap, G. R., Das, B., Singh, K. K., & Srivastava, A. K. (2023). Evaluation of machine learning approaches for prediction of pigeon pea yield based on weather parameters in India. International Journal of Biometeorology, 67(1), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02396-x

Sridhara, S., Ramesh, N., Gopakkali, P., Das, B., Venkatappa, S.D., Sanjivaiah, S. H., Kumar Singh, K., Singh, P., El-Ansary, D. O., Mahmoud, E. A., & Elansary, H. O. (2020). Weather-based neural network, stepwise linear and sparse regression approach for rabi sorghum yield forecasting of Karnataka, India. Agronomy, 10(11), 1645. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111645

Tripathi, S. M., Kalia, A., Mishra, B. P., Mishra, S., Mishra, D., & Shukla, G. (2023). Trends in area production and productivity of sesame in Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59408

Yadav, S. K., Sharma, D. K., Alade, A. J., & Shukla, A. K. (2021). Naive Regression Growth Models for Prediction of Peppermint Yield Production. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 14(2), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1424

Submitted

20.07.2026

Published

28.08.2026

Data Availability Statement

All supporting data will be available upon request from the first and corresponding authors.

How to Cite

Ritu Singh, Gaurav Shukla, Umesh Chandra, Shivangi Jayaswal, verma, A. P. V., Annu, & Himani Maheshwari. (2026). Weather-Based Prediction of Sorghum Yield in Hamirpur District. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 62(4), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62417
Citation