Comparative Gross Morphological Study on the Pituitary Glands of Pig (sus scrofa domestica) and Goat (Capra hircus)


12 / 10

Authors

  • Harideep V College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Santhi Lakshmi M College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Jagapathi Ramayya P College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Bharathi S College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Reddy Dhyana V Veterinary Dispensary,Devapatla
  • Chandra sekhara Rao TS College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Raja K College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Supriya Botlagunta College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Proddatur, Andhra Pradesh
  • Kalyan Chakravarthy M AICRP on Pigs ,SVVU,Tirupati

Keywords:

Diaphragma sellae, Hypophysis cerebri, Neurohypophysis, Pituitary gland, Sella turcica

Abstract

The pituitary gland (hypophysis cerebri) plays a central role in regulating growth, metabolism, reproduction, and homeostasis through its endocrine functions. The present study was undertaken to comparatively evaluate the gross morphology and morphometry of the pituitary gland in pigs and goats. The study was conducted on eight adult Large White Yorkshire crossbred pigs and six adult goats. Following careful dissection, the pituitary glands were examined for their location, relations, external morphology, lobation and biometric parameters. In both species, the pituitary gland was located on the ventral aspect of the diencephalon within the sella turcica and  connected to the hypothalamus by the infundibular stalk. However, distinct species-specific differences were observed. The diaphragma sellae was incomplete with a large central aperture in pigs, whereas it was complete with a minute opening in goats. Externally, the gland was irregularly triangular in pigs and elongated oval to pyriform in goats. Sagittal sections revealed clear lobation of the adenohypophysis and neurohypophysis in both species, with more prominent hypophyseal cleft and compact lobation in goats. Morphometric analysis showed that width, thickness, volume, and weight of the pituitary gland were significantly greater in pigs compared to goats (P < 0.01), while length did not differ significantly. These findings demonstrate marked species-specific variations in pituitary morphology and morphometry, providing valuable baseline data for comparative anatomy and endocrinological studies in domestic animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Harideep V, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

    MVSc Scholar

  • Santhi Lakshmi M, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

    Professor & Head

  • Jagapathi Ramayya P, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

    Associate Dean

  • Bharathi S, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

    Professor ,Veterinary Surgery & Radiology

  • Reddy Dhyana V, Veterinary Dispensary,Devapatla

    Veterinary Assistant Surgeon

  • Chandra sekhara Rao TS, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

    Senior Professor

  • Raja K, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

    Assistant Professor

  • Supriya Botlagunta, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Proddatur, Andhra Pradesh

    Associate Professor

  • Kalyan Chakravarthy M, AICRP on Pigs ,SVVU,Tirupati

    Senior Scientist, AICRP on Pigs ,Tirupati, SVVU

References

Bloom, W. and Fawcett, D.W. 1994. A Textbook of Histology. 12th Edn., Chapman and Hall, New Edn., Chapman and Hall, New York.

Dyce, K.M., Sack, W.O. and Wensing, C.J.G. 2002. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy.3rd Edn., W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp. 294.

Getty,R., 1975. Sisson and Grossman’s The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 5th Edn., W.B. Saunderss Company, Philadelphia.

Ham, A.M., 1969. Histology. 6th Edn., Lippincott Company, Philadelphia and Toronto, Tokyo, pp.817-824.

Komalavalli, M., Balasundaram, K. and Kumaravel, A. 2011. Gross Anatomy of Pituitary Gland in Doe (Capra hircus) of

Different Age Groups. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 23(1): 10-13.

Moriarty G.C. 1973. Adenohypophysis: Ultrastructural cytochemistry. A review. The journal of histochemistry and

cytochemistry: official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 21(10): 855-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/21.10.855.

Nandeshwar, N., Banubakode, S., Charjan, R., Mainde, U., Singh, A., Bhole, P., & Boddupalli, A. 2023. The Morphometrical and Histological Studies on The Pituitary Gland in Different Age Groups of goat

(Capra hircus). Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy, 34(2): 83-87.

Nickle, R., Schummer, A. and Seiferle, E. 1979. The Viscera of the Domestic Mammals.2nd Edn., Revised by Wolfgangottosack, Verlag paul parey Berlin, Hamburg.

Pai, J. and Pathak, M.M. 2005. Morphometrical observations of pituitary gland of Surti buffaloes during three phases of cycle for winter and summer seasons. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 17:28-34.

Rao, A. K., Pathak, V., Rajput, R., Gupta, D. and Shukla, P. 2024. Morphological and Biometrical Study on the Hypophysis Cerebri of Gaddi Goat in Different Seasons. Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 35(2): 139-142.

Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Vala, H., Rodrigo, J., Esteves, F., Santos, C., Cruz, R., Mega, C. and Nobreg, C. 2013. The Endocrine Glands in the Dog: From the Cell to Hormone. InTech. doi: 10.5772/53577

Ye, W., Wang, H., Wang, F. and Wang, J. 2018. Morphology and ultrastructure of the hypophysis in bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) Int. J. Morphol. 36:1316- 1325

Submitted

2026-06-20

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Harideep V, Santhi Lakshmi M, Jagapathi Ramayya P, Bharathi S, Reddy Dhyana V, Chandra sekhara Rao TS, Raja K, Supriya B, & Kalyan Chakravarthy M. (2026). Comparative Gross Morphological Study on the Pituitary Glands of Pig (sus scrofa domestica) and Goat (Capra hircus). Indian Journal of Veterinary Anatomy, 37(2), 70-74. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJVA/article/view/180487