Performance of Grafted Vines on Sodic Soils under Different Agro-climatic Condition of Maharashtra

Performance of grafted grapevines in different agro-climatic conditions


59 / 39

Authors

  • SR Bhagwat R & D Unit Maharashtra State Grape Growers’ Association, Manjri Farm Post, Pune-412307, India.
  • AM Dhole ICAR-NRC for Grapes, Manjri Farm Post, Pune - 412307, India.
  • JM Khillari R & D Unit Maharashtra State Grape Growers’ Association, Manjri Farm Post, Pune-412307, India.
  • JN Kalbhor R & D Unit Maharashtra State Grape Growers’ Association, Manjri Farm Post, Pune-412307, India.
  • AH Gavali ICAR-NRC for Grapes, Manjri Farm Post, Pune - 412307, India.
  • TS Shelake R & D Unit Maharashtra State Grape Growers’ Association, Manjri Farm Post, Pune-412307, India.
  • SY Patil R & D Unit Maharashtra State Grape Growers’ Association, Manjri Farm Post, Pune-412307, India.

Keywords:

Gas exchange parameters, Grapevines, Nutrient status, Sodic soil, Growth parameters

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the performance of growth parameters in grapevines on sodic soils under different climatic conditions in Maharashtra. Vines grafted on dog ridge rootstocks were selected from 5 different locations. The grapevines were planted by adapting a spacing of 3.3m × 1.6 m and trained on Y system. Out of five locations two were from Sangli district, two from Solapur district and one (no sodic soil) was from Pune. The highest vegetative growth viz shoot-length (cm), intermodal distance (mm), cane thickness (mm), leaf area (m2) and total chlorophyll contents were recorded with vines growing under Pune locations (no sodic soil, control). While growth at other locations varied as per sodicity of soil.  For yield observations, the grape bunches were harvested after attaining harvestable maturity with total soluble solids of 17.50° Brix. The gas exchange parameters except rate of photosynthesis were non-significant at all the location for both years of study. The results obtained on soil nutrients on available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrient in soil were significantly reduced over control. The study showed that the high sodic soil had negative impact on growth, yield, gas exchanges parameters and nutrients status in grapevines. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi A and Baiker DA (2000). Stomatal and non-stomatal photosynthesis limited factors in

wheat under drought stress condition. Iranian J. Agric. Sci. 31: 813 – 825.

Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris.

Plant Physiol. 24 :1-15.

Behboudian MH, Törökfalvy E and Walker RR (1986) Effects of salinity on ionic content,

water relations and gas exchange parameters in some citrus scion-rootstock combinations.

Sci. Hort. 28(112):105-116.

Chhabra R, Singh SB and Abrol IP (1979). Effect of exchangeable sodium percentage on the

growth, yield and chemical composition of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Soil Sci.

: 242 - 247.

Christensen P (1969). Seasonal changes and distribution of nutritional elements in Thompson

Seedless grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 20: 176 -190

Downton WJS (1977) Influence of rootstocks on the accumulation of chloride, sodium

and potassium in grapevines. Aust J Agric Res 28: 879–889

Downton WJS and Millhouse J (1985). Chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations of salt

stressed plants. Plant Science Letters 37 (3): 205-212.

Fisarakis I, Chartzoulakis K, Stavrakas D (2001) Response of Sultana vines (Vitis vinifera L.)

on six rootstocks to NaCl salinity exposure and recovery. Agric Water Manage 51:13 –27

Fitzpatrick RW (2002) Land degradation processes. In: McVicar TR, Rui L, Walker J,

Fitzpatrick RW and Changming L (eds) Regional Water and Soil Assessment for

Managing Sustainable Agriculture in China and Australia, ACIAR Monograph No.

pp 119 - 129

Jackson ML (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Lanyon DM, Cass A and Hansen D (2004. The effect of soil properties on wine performance.

CSIRO, Land and Water Technical Report No. 34/4

Misra AN, Biswal AK and Misra M (2002) Physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects

of water stress responses in plants and the biotechnological applications. Proc. Nat. Acad.

Sci. (India) 72 B: 115–134

Munns R.(2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25:

– 250

Munns R and Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59:

‒ 681. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911.

Neocleous D and Vasilakakis M (2007) Effect of NaCl stress on red raspberry (Rubus idoeus

L. ). Sci. Hort. 112: 282 – 289

Netzer Y, Shenker M and Schwartz A (2014) Effects of irrigation using treated wastewater on

table grape vineyards: dynamics of sodium accumulation in soil and plant. Irrig Sci.. DOI

1007/s00271-014-0430-8.

Paranychianakis NV and Chartzoulakis KS (2005) Irrigation of Mediterranean crops whit

saline water: from physiology to management practices. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 106: 171-

Patrick WH Jr. and Wyatt R (1964). Soil nitrogen loss as a result of alternate submergence and

drying. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 28: 647- 653.

Prior LD, Grieve AM, Slavich PG and Cullis BR (1992) Sodium chloride and soil texture

interactions in irrigated field grown sultana grapevines. II. Plant mineral content, growth

and physiology. Aust J Agric Res. 43: 1067–1083

Rhoades JD (1982) Soluble salts. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd ed.; Page AL (ed)

Agronomy Monograph No 9; American Society of Agronomy, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA,

Part 2; pp. 167–179

Robinson JB and McCarthy MG (1985) Use of petiole analysis for assessment of vineyard

nutrient status in the Barossa district of South Australia. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 25: 231-240.

Singh MV, Chhabra R and Abrol IP (1979). In: Annual Report, 1979, Central Soil Salinity

Research Institute, Karnal.

Singh SB, Chhabra R and Abrol IP (1980). Effect of soil sodicity on the yield and chemical

composition of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) grown for fodder. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 50:

– 856.

Singh SB, Chhabra R and Abrol IP (1981) Effect of exchangeable sodium on the yield,

chemical composition and oil content of safflower and linseed. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 51:

– 891.

Sudhir P and Murthy SD (2004) Effects of salt stress on basic processes of photosynthesis.

Photosynthetica 42: 481- 486.

Tardieu F (2005) Plant tolerance to water deficit: physical limits and possibilities for progress.

Geo. Sci. 337: 57- 67.

Walker RR, Sedgley M, Blesing MA and Douglas TJ (1984) Anatomy, ultrastructure and

assimilate concentrations of roots of citrus genotypes differing in ability for salt

exclusion. J. Exp. Bot. 35: 1481–1494.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-08-03

Published

2023-08-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SR Bhagwat, AM Dhole, JM Khillari, JN Kalbhor, AH Gavali, TS Shelake, & SY Patil. (2023). Performance of Grafted Vines on Sodic Soils under Different Agro-climatic Condition of Maharashtra: Performance of grafted grapevines in different agro-climatic conditions. Journal of Soil Salinity and Water Quality, 13(2), 83-90. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/JoSSWQ/article/view/140189