PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT GROUNDNUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) VARIETIES AND ECONOMICS UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SCHEDULES


578 / 176

Authors

  • SK. CHANDINI* Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla- 522 101
  • N. VENKATA LAKSHMI
  • M. SREE REKHA
  • M. RAVI BABU

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.1.05

Keywords:

Economics, Groundnut varieties, Irrigation schedules, IW/CPE, Pod Yield

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2021-22 at Agricultural College, Bapatla to evaluate the influence of irrigation schedules on yield and economics of different groundnut varieties. The experiment was laidout in split-plot design and replicated thrice. The experiment consisted of three irrigation schedules viz., IW/CPE ratio of 1.0 (M1), IW/CPE ratio of 0.8 (M2) and IW/CPE ratio of 0.6 (M3) as main plots and four groundnut varieties i.e., TAG-24 (V1), Dheeraj (V2), Kadiri Leapskhi (V3) and Kadiri Chitravati (V4) in sup plots. The results revealed that IW/CPE ratio of 1.0 produced significantly higher pod yield (3175 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4291 kg ha-1) over IW/CPE ratio of 0.6 but it was at par with IW/CPE ratio of 0.8. Among the varieties tested, highest pod and haulm yield was recorded with Kadiri Lepakshi (3607 kg ha-1) which was significantly superior over Kadiri Chitravati, Dheeraj and TAG-24. Highest gross returns, net returns and returns per rupee invested were obtained with IW/CPE ratio of 1.0 with Kadiri Lepakshi variety when compared to other treatments

References

1. FAOSTAT. 2021. Food and Agriculture

2. Organization Corporate Statistical

3. Database. Retrieved from the website

4. (https://www.fao.org) on 23.09.2022.

5. Indiastat. 2021. Retrieved from the website

6. (http://www.indiastat.com)on 03.10.2022.

7. Kamble, B.M., Kathmale, D.K and Rathod, S.D.

8. Soil nutrient status, uptake, yield

9. and economics of groundnut-wheat

10. cropping sequence as influenced by

11. organic sources and fertilizers. Journal

12. of the Indian Society of Soil

13. Science. 66(1): 66-75.

14. Kotadiya, P.B., Hirpara, D.S and Kanjiya, L.V.H.

15. Response of summer groundnut

16. (Arachis hypogaea L.) to irrigation level

17. and anti-transpirant on quality, soil

18. parameters and economics. The Pharma

19. Innovation Journal. 10(10): 315-317.

20. Lokhande, D., Jayewar, N and Mundhe, A.

21. Summer groundnut (Arachis

22. hypogaea L.) productivity influenced by

23. irrigation scheduling: A climatological

24. approach. International Journal of

25. Current Microbiology and Applied

26. Science. Special Issue. (6): 87-91.

27. Mishra, K. 2020. Effect of weed management

28. practices on weed control, yield, and

29. economics in rabi groundnut (Arachis

30. hypogaea L.) Odisha. Journal of

31. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.

32. (2): 2435-2439.

33. Mouri, S.J., Sarkar, M.A.R., Uddin., M.R.,

34. Sarker, U.K., Kaysar, M.S and Hoque,

35. M.M.I. 2018. Effect of variety andphosphorus on the yield components and

36. yield of groundnut. Journal of

37. Progressive Agriculture. 29(2): 117-126.

38. Nirmal De, Meena, R.S., Yadav, R.S., Reager,

39. M.L., Meena, V.S., Verma, J.P., Verma,

40. S. K and Kansotia, B. C. 2015.

41. Temperature use efficiency and yield of

42. groundnut varieties in response to

43. sowing dates and fertility levels in

44. western dry zone of India. American

45. Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 7(3):

46. -177.

47. Parshall, R.L. 1950. Measuring water in

48. irrigation channels with parshall flumes

49. and small weirs. USDA, Circular No. 843.

50. pp: 500.

51. Pawar, D.D., Dingre, S.K and Nanaware, D.M.

52. Yield and quality of summer

53. groundnut under different irrigation

54. scheduling through micro sprinkler in

55. clay loam soils of western Maharashtra.

56. Journal of Agricultural Research and

57. Technology. 38(1): 102-106.

58. Ranjitha, S.P., Ramulu, V., Jayasree, G and

59. Narender Reddy, S. 2018. Growth, yield

60. and water use efficiency of groundnut

61. under drip and surface furrow

62. irrigation. International Journal of Current

63. Microbiology and Applied Sciences.

64. (09): 1371-1376.

65. Rathod, A.B and Trivedi, A.S. 2011. Summer

66. groundnut crop performance and

67. economics under drip irrigation at

68. various water application levels.

69. Proceedings of the National Conference

70. on Recent Trends in Engineering and

71. Technology held between 13th and 14th

72. May, 2011 at B.V.M. Engineering

73. College, V.V. Nagar, Gujarat, India.

74. Sunitha, V., Vanaja, M., Sowmya, P., Razak, S.

75. A., Kumar, G. V., Anitha, Y and Lakshmi,

76. N. J. 2015. Variability in response of

77. groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

78. genotypes to moisture stress and stress

79. release. International Journal of Bioresource and Stress Management. 6(2):

80. -249.

81. Suresh, K., Balaguravaiah, D., Ramulu, V and

82. Sujani Rao, C.H. 2013. Comparative

83. efficiency of sprinkler irrigation over

84. check basin irrigation in groundnut at

85. different irrigation schedules.

86. International Journal of Plant Animal and

87. Environmental Sciences. 3(2): 9-13.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2023

How to Cite

SK. CHANDINI*, N. VENKATA LAKSHMI, M. SREE REKHA, & M. RAVI BABU. (2023). PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT GROUNDNUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) VARIETIES AND ECONOMICS UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SCHEDULES. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 51(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.1.05