ORGANOLEPTIC CHARACTERISTICS AND NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF WHEY-GRAPE JUICE BLENDED BEVERAGE
445 / 184
Authors
-
A. HARIKA, K. LAKSHMI*, G. NIRMALA DEVI and VIMALA BEERA
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Community Science, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur – 522 034
Keywords:
Beverage, Grape, Organoleptic evaluation, WheyAbstract
The study was conducted to develop whey and grape juice blended beverage by using whey, grape juice and sugar in the year 2022. Three beverage compositions were prepared: WGB1 (90%Whey:10%GJ), WGB2 (80%Whey:20%GJ) and WGB3 (70%Whey:30%GJ). Five grams of sugar was added to every 100 ml of the beverage. Organoleptic evaluation of the beverages was carried out by 25 semi-trained panel members. A 9- point hedonic scale was used to assess the sensory attributes such as color, appearance, flavor, taste, consistency and overall acceptability. The one-way ANOVA was used to test for significant differences in the mean scores of sensory evaluation. Although all combinations of whey and grape juice were found acceptable, the treatment WGB2 which contained 70 ml whey, 30 ml grape juice and 5 g sugar, received significantly highest mean scores for color (8.19), appearance (7.80), flavor (7.80), taste (7.84), consistency (7.92) and overall acceptability (8.19), which was found superior amongst all the treatments. The results of the nutrient analysis showed that the highly accepted beverage, which is 70:30 whey-grape juice blend contained 90% moisture, 0.64 g ash, 0.81 g protein, 0.41 g fat, 3.28 g lactose and 101.8 mg calcium. These results showed a high potential to produce and develop a new functional whey product.
References
1. Bilal ,M., Wang, Z., Cui J., Ferreira, L.,
2. Bharagava, N and Iqbal, H. 2020. Environmental
3. impact of lignocellulosic
4. wastes and their effective exploitation as
5. smart carriers - A drive towards greener
6. and eco-friendlier biocatalytic systems.
7. Science of the Total Environment. 722:1-
8. Booth, J.E. 1996. Principles of textile testing.
9. C.B.S. publishers, New Delhi. pp. 256.
10. Bora, R and Padmini, T. 2019. Fibre extraction
11. from Calotropis gigantea stem with
12. different retting methods and its
13. comparision. International Journal of
14. Chemical Studies. 7(3): 144-150.
15. Debnath, S and Sengupta, S. 2009. Effect of
16. linear density, twist and blend proportion
17. on some physical properties of Jute and
18. hollow polyster blended yarn. Indian
19. Journal Fibre &Textile Research. 34(1):
20. -19.
21. Devi, R. D. 2012. Extraction and spinnability
22. of mesta (Hibiscus sabdariffa) fibre. M.Sc.
23. Thesis submitted to University of
24. Agricultural Sciences, Dharward.
25. Dhaliwal, J.S. 2019. Natural fibres:
26. Applications.Retrieved from the website
27. www.intechopen.com/chapters/69714 on
28. 8.22.
29. Dhanalaxmi, K and Vastrad, J. 2013. Influence
30. of retting methods of quality of mesta
31. fibre. Indian Journal Products and
32. Resources. 4 (2): 178-183.
33. Hulle, A., Kadole, P and Katkar, P. 2015. Agave
34. Americana leaf fibres. Fibres. 3: 64-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fib3010064
35. Karimah, A., Ridho, M., Munawar, S., Adi, D.,
36. Ismadi, Damayanti, R., Subiyanto, B.,
37. Fatriasari, W and Fudholi, A. 2021. A
38. review on natural fibres for development
39. of eco-friendly bio-composite:
40. characteristics, and utilizations. Journal
41. of Material Research and Technology.
42. : 2442-2458.
43. Karthik, T and Ganesan, P. 2012. Development
44. of eco-friendly textile composites from
45. Calotropis gigantea bast fibre.
46. International Journal General
47. Engineering and Technology (Ijget). 1
48. (1): 26-43.
49. Lakshmi, R.P. 2014. Development of blended
50. fabric from Calotropis gigantea bast
51. fibre. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to the
52. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University,
53. Coimbatore.
54. Mwaikambo, L.Y and Ansell, M. P. 2006.
55. Mechanical properties of alkali treated
56. plant fibres and their potential as
57. reinforcement materials, Part I, Hemp
58. fibres. Journal of Materials Science. 41
59. (8): 2483-2496.
60. Reddy, N and Yang Y. 2009. Extraction and
61. characterization of natural cellulose
62. fibres from common milkweed stems.
63. Polymer Engineering and Science.
64. (11): 2212-2217.
65. Sasikala, P and Thangamani, K. 2017. A
66. comparative study on bamboo/cotton
67. and bamboo/polyester blended woven
68. fabrics. International Education and
69. Research Journal. 3(8): 28-35.8.
70. Yang, Y and Reddy, N. 2006. Properties of high
71. quality and long natural cellulose fibres
72. from rice straw and method of producing
73. rice straw fibre. Journal of Agricultural
74. and Food Chemistry. 54(21): 8077-8081.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
