COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES OF HOUSEHOLDS IN SELECTED TOWN PANCHAYAT AND URBAN AREAS OF COIMBATORE


996 / 246

Authors

  • K. DEEPIKAVANI* and M. R. THILAKAM Department of Resource Management, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore- 641 043

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.1.11

Keywords:

Disposal of waste, Household practices, Segregation of waste, Solid waste Management.

Abstract

The study was conducted in the year of 2022 to evaluate households’ solid waste disposal practices in selected town panchayat and urban regions of Coimbatore and to determine the association between household solid waste disposal and selected socio-demographic variables.Town panchayat and urban areas of Coimbatore were examined for this research. Fifty samples of town panchayat and urban families were evaluated for the study. It was observed that urban households dispose of solid garbage more effectively than town panchayat families. It was revealed that some socio-demographic variables, such as place of residence, education level of homemakers, and household income were correlated with disposal techniques. Most town panchayat homes utilize door-to-door collection services to dispose of unsorted rubbish. As per this study, individuals primarily throw out non-segregated trash because they do not care, and sanitation staff does not encourage them to throw away only segregated waste. Therefore, public participation is crucial for solid waste management, as it minimizes both municipal labour and the costs associated with garbage separation. Municipalities can also develop public awareness about solid waste management and establish rigid rules on disposal of non-separated trash so as to increase the practice of waste segregation .

References

1. Akmal, T and Jamil, F. 2021. Assessing health

2. damages from improper disposal of solid

3. waste in Metropolitan Islamabad–

4. Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Sustainability.

5. (5): 2717.

6. Boateng, S., Amoako, P., Appiah, D. O., Poku,

7. A.A and Garsonu, E.K. 2016.

8. Comparative analysis of households

9. solid waste management in rural and

10. urban Ghana. Journal of Environmental

11. and Public Health. pp.1–10.

12. Eshwari, K., Shetty, R. S., Akhila, D., James,

13. B. S and Pandey, A. K. 2019. Knowledge,

14. attitude and practices towards

15. household solid waste management

16. among semi-urban residents- A

17. community based cross sectional study

18. from Southern part of Coastal Karnataka,

19. India. Indian Journal of Public Health

20. Research and Development. 10(9):

21. –390.

22. Fadhullah, W., Imran, N. I. N., Ismail, S. N. S.,

23. Jaafar, M. H and Abdullah, H. 2022.

24. Household solid waste management

25. practices and perceptions among

26. residents in theEast Coast of

27. Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 22(1).

28. Jeremy. 2015. The importance of proper waste

29. disposal. Published on 7.12.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4789(15)30394-9

30. Retrieved from website (https://junkit.ca/

31. blog/the-importance-of-proper-wastedisposal/) on 12.8.2022.

32. Kiran, K. G., Kini, S., K., R., P., S. N and Kiran,

33. N. U. 2015. KAP study of solid waste

34. disposal of households in Kuttar &

35. Manjanadi Panchayath covered under

36. gramaskhema programme of K.S. Hegde

37. Medical Academy. Journal of Health and

38. Allied Sciences NU. 05(03):029–035.Noufal, M., Maalla, Z and Adipah, S. 2020.

39. Households’ participation in solid waste

40. management system of Homs city,

41. Syria. Geo Journal. 86:1441-1463.

42. Noufal, M., Yuanyuan, L., Maalla, Z andAdipah,

43. S. 2020. Determinants ofhousehold solid

44. waste generation and composition in

45. Homs City, Syria. Journal of

46. Environmental and Public Health.

47. e7460356.

48. Ntagisanimana, G., Yu, Z and Ma, H. 2021.

49. Current situation of solid waste

50. management in East African countries

51. and the proposal for sustainable

52. management. African Journal of

53. Environmental Science and

54. Technology. 15(1):1–15.

55. Pandey, S. 2014. Waste to Resources: A Waste

56. Management Handbook. The Energy and

57. Resources Institute. pp.1.

58. Sabarinah, Z. 2017. The importance of waste

59. management knowledge to encourage

60. household waste-sorting behaviour in

61. Indonesia. International Journal of Waste

62. Resources. 07(04).

63. Saja, A. M. A., Zimar, A. M. Z andJunaideen, S.

64. M. 2021. Municipal solid waste

65. management practices and challenges

66. in the Southeastern Coastal Cities of

67. SriLanka. Sustainability. 13(8):4556.

68. Subramani, T and Ponkumar, S. 2012.

69. Anaerobic digestion of aerobic

70. pretreated organic waste. International

71. Journal of Modern Engineering

72. Research. Vol. 2(3):1-2.

73. Tamil Nadu Housing Board Scheme. 2022.

74. Tamil Nadu housing board scheme:

75. TNHB schemes, eligibility & application

76. process. Retrieved from the website

77. (https://www.godigit.com/guides/

78. government-schemes/tamil-naduhousing-board-scheme-tnhb) on

79. 8.2022.

80. Tang, D., Shi, L., Huang, X., Zhao, Z., Zhou, B

81. and Bethel, B. J. 2022. Influencing factors

82. on the household-waste-classification

83. behavior of urban residents: A case study

84. in Shanghai. International Journal of

85. Environmental Research and Public

86. Health. 19(11):6528.

87. The Hindu. 2013. How to compost kitchen waste

88. in 6.5 steps?By Prteethi Sukumaran

89. published on 13.8.2013. Retrieved from

90. the website (https://www.thehindu.com/

91. news/cities/chennai/how-to-compostkitchen-waste-in-65steps/

92. article5016625.ece) on 15.9.2022.

93. Thyagarajan, L. P., Jeyanthi, J andKavitha, D.

94. Vulnerability analysis of the

95. groundwater quality around VellaloreKurichi landfill region in Coimbatore.

96. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology. 3: 125-130.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2023

How to Cite

K. DEEPIKAVANI* and M. R. THILAKAM. (2023). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES OF HOUSEHOLDS IN SELECTED TOWN PANCHAYAT AND URBAN AREAS OF COIMBATORE. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 51(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.1.11