COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES OF HOUSEHOLDS IN SELECTED TOWN PANCHAYAT AND URBAN AREAS OF COIMBATORE
996 / 246
Keywords:
Disposal of waste, Household practices, Segregation of waste, Solid waste Management.Abstract
The study was conducted in the year of 2022 to evaluate households’ solid waste disposal practices in selected town panchayat and urban regions of Coimbatore and to determine the association between household solid waste disposal and selected socio-demographic variables.Town panchayat and urban areas of Coimbatore were examined for this research. Fifty samples of town panchayat and urban families were evaluated for the study. It was observed that urban households dispose of solid garbage more effectively than town panchayat families. It was revealed that some socio-demographic variables, such as place of residence, education level of homemakers, and household income were correlated with disposal techniques. Most town panchayat homes utilize door-to-door collection services to dispose of unsorted rubbish. As per this study, individuals primarily throw out non-segregated trash because they do not care, and sanitation staff does not encourage them to throw away only segregated waste. Therefore, public participation is crucial for solid waste management, as it minimizes both municipal labour and the costs associated with garbage separation. Municipalities can also develop public awareness about solid waste management and establish rigid rules on disposal of non-separated trash so as to increase the practice of waste segregation .
References
1. Akmal, T and Jamil, F. 2021. Assessing health
2. damages from improper disposal of solid
3. waste in Metropolitan Islamabad–
4. Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Sustainability.
5. (5): 2717.
6. Boateng, S., Amoako, P., Appiah, D. O., Poku,
7. A.A and Garsonu, E.K. 2016.
8. Comparative analysis of households
9. solid waste management in rural and
10. urban Ghana. Journal of Environmental
11. and Public Health. pp.1–10.
12. Eshwari, K., Shetty, R. S., Akhila, D., James,
13. B. S and Pandey, A. K. 2019. Knowledge,
14. attitude and practices towards
15. household solid waste management
16. among semi-urban residents- A
17. community based cross sectional study
18. from Southern part of Coastal Karnataka,
19. India. Indian Journal of Public Health
20. Research and Development. 10(9):
21. –390.
22. Fadhullah, W., Imran, N. I. N., Ismail, S. N. S.,
23. Jaafar, M. H and Abdullah, H. 2022.
24. Household solid waste management
25. practices and perceptions among
26. residents in theEast Coast of
27. Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 22(1).
28. Jeremy. 2015. The importance of proper waste
29. disposal. Published on 7.12.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4789(15)30394-9
30. Retrieved from website (https://junkit.ca/
31. blog/the-importance-of-proper-wastedisposal/) on 12.8.2022.
32. Kiran, K. G., Kini, S., K., R., P., S. N and Kiran,
33. N. U. 2015. KAP study of solid waste
34. disposal of households in Kuttar &
35. Manjanadi Panchayath covered under
36. gramaskhema programme of K.S. Hegde
37. Medical Academy. Journal of Health and
38. Allied Sciences NU. 05(03):029–035.Noufal, M., Maalla, Z and Adipah, S. 2020.
39. Households’ participation in solid waste
40. management system of Homs city,
41. Syria. Geo Journal. 86:1441-1463.
42. Noufal, M., Yuanyuan, L., Maalla, Z andAdipah,
43. S. 2020. Determinants ofhousehold solid
44. waste generation and composition in
45. Homs City, Syria. Journal of
46. Environmental and Public Health.
47. e7460356.
48. Ntagisanimana, G., Yu, Z and Ma, H. 2021.
49. Current situation of solid waste
50. management in East African countries
51. and the proposal for sustainable
52. management. African Journal of
53. Environmental Science and
54. Technology. 15(1):1–15.
55. Pandey, S. 2014. Waste to Resources: A Waste
56. Management Handbook. The Energy and
57. Resources Institute. pp.1.
58. Sabarinah, Z. 2017. The importance of waste
59. management knowledge to encourage
60. household waste-sorting behaviour in
61. Indonesia. International Journal of Waste
62. Resources. 07(04).
63. Saja, A. M. A., Zimar, A. M. Z andJunaideen, S.
64. M. 2021. Municipal solid waste
65. management practices and challenges
66. in the Southeastern Coastal Cities of
67. SriLanka. Sustainability. 13(8):4556.
68. Subramani, T and Ponkumar, S. 2012.
69. Anaerobic digestion of aerobic
70. pretreated organic waste. International
71. Journal of Modern Engineering
72. Research. Vol. 2(3):1-2.
73. Tamil Nadu Housing Board Scheme. 2022.
74. Tamil Nadu housing board scheme:
75. TNHB schemes, eligibility & application
76. process. Retrieved from the website
77. (https://www.godigit.com/guides/
78. government-schemes/tamil-naduhousing-board-scheme-tnhb) on
79. 8.2022.
80. Tang, D., Shi, L., Huang, X., Zhao, Z., Zhou, B
81. and Bethel, B. J. 2022. Influencing factors
82. on the household-waste-classification
83. behavior of urban residents: A case study
84. in Shanghai. International Journal of
85. Environmental Research and Public
86. Health. 19(11):6528.
87. The Hindu. 2013. How to compost kitchen waste
88. in 6.5 steps?By Prteethi Sukumaran
89. published on 13.8.2013. Retrieved from
90. the website (https://www.thehindu.com/
91. news/cities/chennai/how-to-compostkitchen-waste-in-65steps/
92. article5016625.ece) on 15.9.2022.
93. Thyagarajan, L. P., Jeyanthi, J andKavitha, D.
94. Vulnerability analysis of the
95. groundwater quality around VellaloreKurichi landfill region in Coimbatore.
96. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology. 3: 125-130.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.