IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON MILLET YIELD IN INDIA SINCE 1991: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
802 / 549
Keywords:
ARDL, Climate Change, India, Millet yieldAbstract
This study examines the effects of climate change on millet yield in India using secondary
data for thirty years (1991-2020). The variation in agricultural millet production in India is estimated
using average annual temperature, precipitation, CO2 emissions per capita, and the rural
population. Assessing the order of integration using the unit root test and augmented DickeyFuller (ADF). Estimations of the unit root demonstrate that all variables are stationary at the level
and first difference. The autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) bound test is applied to establish
the relationship between variables. The study demonstrates that the average yearly temperature
has a negative and significant effect on millet yield, whereas, CO2 emission per capita has a
favourable long-term impact on millet yield. In India, 1% increase in yearly average temperature
results in a 3.06% decrease in millet yield, while 1% increase in CO2 emissions per capita results
in a 0.42% gain in millet yield on average. In the short run, independent variables do not affect
millet yield. As the population of India grows, the nation will face food security issues. There is a
need for strategies to mitigate the negative impact of temperature on agricultural yield and secure
sufficient food for a growing population
References
1. Adeosun, O. T., Asare-Nuamah, P and Mabe,
2. F. N. 2021. Vulnerability analysis of
3. Nigeria’s agricultural output growth and
4. climate change. Management of
5. Environmental Quality: An International
6. Journal. 32 (6):1352-1366.
7. Arora, N. K. 2019. Impact of climate change
8. on agriculture production and its
9. sustainable solutions. Environmental
10. Sustainability. 2 (2):95-96.
11. Birthal, P. S., Negi, D. S., Kumar, S., Aggarwal,
12. S., Suresh, A and Tajuddin Khan, M.
13. How sensitive is Indian agriculture
14. to climate change? Indian Journal of
15. Agricultural Economics. 69 (4):474-487.
16. Chandio, A. A., Jiang, Y., Rehman, A and Rauf,
17. A. 2020. Short and long-run impacts of
18. climate change on agriculture: an
19. empirical evidence from China.
20. International Journal of Climate Change
21. Strategies and Management. 12 (2):201-
22. Eshete, Z. S., Mulatu, D. W and Gatiso, T. G.
23. CO2 emissions, agricultural
24. productivity and welfare in Ethiopia.
25. International Journal of Climate Change
26. Strategies and Management. 12 (5):687-
27. FAO.2020. FAOSTAT of Food and Agriculture
28. Organization of the United Nations.
29. Export value of millet for India. Retrieved
30. from the website (https://www.fao.org/
31. faostat/en/#data/TCL) on 24.8.2022.
32. Government of India. 2017. Economic Survey
33. of India. In Ministry of Finance. Retrieved
34. from the website (https://mofapp.nic.in/
35. economicsurvey/economicsurvey/pdf/
36. -101_Chapter_06_
37. ENGLISH_Vol_01_2017-18.pdf) on
38. 8.2022.
39. Haque, M. I. 2022. Impact of climate change
40. on food security in Saudi Arabia/ : a
41. roadmap to agriculture-water
42. sustainability. 12 (1):1-18.
43. Holst, R., Yu, X and Grün, C. 2013. Climate
44. Change, risk and grain yields in China
45. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 12 (7):
46. -1291.
47. Hossain, M. S., Qian, L., Arshad, M., Shahid,
48. S., Fahad, S and Akhter, J. 2019. Climate
49. change and crop farming in Bangladesh:
50. an analysis of economic impacts.
51. International Journal of Climate Change
52. Strategies and Management. 11 (3): 424-
53. Jadaun, K. K and Ansari, S. 2022. Agriculture
54. Productivity and Economic Growth in
55. India: An Ardl Model. South Asian Journal
56. of Social Studies and Economics. 15
57. (4):1-9.
58. Kalli, R and Jena, P. R. 2022. How large is the
59. farm income loss due to climate change?
60. Evidence from India. China Agricultural
61. Economic Review. 14 (2): 331-348.
62. Karimi, V., Karami, E and Keshavarz, M. 2018.
63. Climate change and agriculture: Impacts
64. and adaptive responses in Iran. Journal
65. of Integrative Agriculture. 17 (1):1-15.
66. Matarira, C. H., Pullanikkatil, D., Kaseke, T.,
67. Shava, E and Manatsa, D. 2013. Socioeconomic impacts of climate change on
68. subsistence communities: Some
69. observations from Lesotho. International
70. Journal of Climate Change Strategies
71. and Management. 5 (4): 404-417.
72. GoI.2022. Millet Production. Ministry of
73. Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, New
74. Delhi. Retrieved from the website (https:/
75. /agricoop.nic.in/sites/default/files/
76. Crops.pdf) on 24.8.2022.
77. Nasrullah, M., Rizwanullah, M., Yu, X., Jo, H.,
78. Sohail, M. T and Liang, L. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjab323
79. Autoregressive distributed lag (Ardl)
80. approach to study the impact of climate
81. change and other factors on rice
82. production in South Korea. Journal of
83. Water and Climate Change. 12 (6): 2256-
84. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y and Smith, R. J. 2001.
85. Bounds testing approaches to the
86. analysis of level relationships. Journal of
87. Applied Econometrics. 16 (3): 289-326.
88. Praveen, B and Sharma, P. 2020. Climate
89. Change and its impacts on Indian
90. agriculture: An Econometric analysis.
91. Journal of Public Affairs. 20 (1):1-6.
92. Wang, S. W., Lee, W. K and Son, Y. 2017. An
93. assessment of climate change impacts
94. and adaptation in South Asian
95. agriculture. International Journal of
96. Climate Change Strategies and
97. Management. 9 (4): 517-534
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.