PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF GROUNDNUT CROP VARIETY KADIRI LEPAKSHI (K 1812) IN CHITTOOR DISTRICT
1676 / 1341
Authors
-
SAHAJA DEVA
Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515 001
-
, R. PRASANNA LAKSHMI
Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515 001
-
M.K. JYOSTHNA
Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Ananthapuramu-515 001
Keywords:
Economics, Groundnut, Kadiri Lepakshi, YieldAbstract
The on-farm testing was conducted at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalikiri in the farmer’s fields of Chittoor district to assess the performance of Kadiri Lepakshi variety under irrigated and rainfed conditions for yield and profitability of groundnut during rabi 2020-21 and kharif 2021-22. Technologies assessed in the study comprised of ‘Kadiri Lepaskhi’ as improved variety and ‘Narayani’ as farmers practice (local check). Results of two-year data revealed that Kadiri Lepakshi recorded 28.0 and 13.5 percent enhancement in pod yield during rabi 2020-21 and kharif 2021-22, respectively over farmers practice (12.61 q ha-1). As per the economic analysis, Kadiri Lepakshi and Narayani provided net returns of Rs. 22750 ha-1 and Rs.11775 ha-1 and BCR of 1.39 and 1.21, respectively. Overall, B:C ratio was found higher in Kadiri Lepakshi over local check variety Narayani.
References
1. Akram, Sk.V., Prasad, P.V.N., Chandrasekhar, K
2. and Subbaiah, P.V. 2021. Yield and
3. economics of groundnut (Arachis
4. hypogaea L.) cultivars as affected by
5. levels of Nitrogen. The Andhra Agriculture
6. Journal. 68 (2): 163-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/IMH.2017.0029
7. Indiastat. 2021. Area, Production and
8. Productivity of Groundnut in India.
9. Retrieved from the website (http://
10. indiastat.com) on 17.2.2023.
11. Indiastat. 2021. Area, Production and
12. Productivity of Groundnut in India.
13. Retrieved from website (http://
14. indiastat.com) on 17.2.2023.
15. Chandini, Sk., Lakshmi, N.V., Sree Rekha, M and
16. Ravi Babu, M. 2011. Influence of irrigation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/207123
17. schedules on yield and nutrient uptake of
18. groundnut varieties. International Journal
19. of Plant and Soil Science. 34 (24): 348-
20. Mohite, U.A., Mohite, A.B and Jadhav, Y.R.
21. Effect of sowing windows on growth
22. and yield ofgroundnut varieties during
23. kharif season. Contemporary Research in
24. India. 7:189-192.
25. Naik, A.K., Pallavi, N and Sannathimmappa, H.G.
26. Performance of different
27. spanish-type groundnut varieties suitable
28. under central dry zone of Karnataka, India.
29. International Journal of Current
30. Microbiology and Applied Sciences.
31. :1394-1397.
32. Paul, A and Dawson, J. 2022. Effect of
33. biofertilizers and spacing on growth
34. parameters of groundnut (Arachis
35. hypogaea L.). The Pharma Innovation.
36. (4): 264-266.
37. Priya, T., Subramanyam, D and Sumathi, V. 2016.
38. Performance of groundnut (Arachis
39. hypogaea L.) cultivars under different plant
40. populations during early kharif. Indian
41. Journal of Agricultural Research. pp.
42. -51.
43. Shete, S.S., Bulbule, A.V., Patil, D.S and Pawar,
44. R.B. 2018. Effect of foliar nutrition on
45. growth and uptake of macro and
46. micronutrients of kharif groundnut
47. (Arachis hypogea L.). International Journal
48. of Current Microbiology and Applied
49. Sciences. 7(10):1193-1200.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
