STANDARADIZATION OF MEAT ANALOGUES INCORPORATED WITH TENDER JACKFRUIT
820 / 335
Authors
-
H. J .K. NOVA*
Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur – 680 656
Keywords:
chickpea, cowpea, meat analogue, tender jackfruit, wheat glutenAbstract
The study was carried out for three months during 2021 at Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara and standardization was done formulating varied treatments of meat analogues followed by organoleptic evaluation in which sensory attributes such as appearance, colour, flavour, taste, texture and overall acceptability of tender jackfruit incorporated cowpea and chickpea meat analogues were evaluated. The results revealed that among different treatments, the treatments T5 (40% CWP+25% TJ +25% WG +5% DSF +5% OMF) and T10 (50% CP+20% TJ+20% WG +5% DSF +5% OMF) were observed to have highest scores for all the sensory attributes including appearance, colour, flavour, texture, taste and overall acceptability of tender jackfruit incorporated meat analogues, respectively. Statistical analysis by applying Kendall’s (W) test showed that Kendall’s (W) value among different treatments of each set of both tender jackfruit incorporated meat analogues was highly significant with regards to all quality attributes. This study revealed that incorporation of wheat gluten along with tender jackfruit both at 20-25 percent showed improved sensory qualities such as texture, flavour, taste and overall acceptability with higher consumer preference.
References
1. Cho, N.H., Shaw, J.E., Karuranga, S., Huang, Y.,
2. da Rocha Fernandes, J.D., Ohlrogge, A.W
3. and Malanda, B.I.D.F. 2018. IDF Diabetes
4. Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes
5. prevalence for 2017 and projections for
6. Diabetes Research and Clinical
7. Practice. 138: 271-281.
8. Cunsolo V., Muccilli V., Saletti R and Foti, S.
9. Mass spectrometry in the proteome
10. analysis of mature cereal kernels. Mass
11. Spectrometry Reviews. 31:448–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048150
12. Ferreira, H., Vasconcelos, M., Gil, A. M and Pinto,
13. E. 2021. Benefits of pulse consumption on
14. metabolism and health: A systematic
15. review of randomized controlled
16. trials. Critical Reviews in Food Science
17. and Nutrition. 61(1): 85-96.
18. Hemler, E.C and Hu, F.B. 2019. Plant-based diets
19. for personal, population, and planetary
20. health. Advances in Nutrition. 10 (4):S275-
21. S283.
22. International Institute for Population Sciences
23. (IIPS) and ICF. 2021. National Family
24. Health Survey (NFHS-5), India, 2019-21:
25. Mizoram. Mumbai: IIPS. Retrieved from the
26. website on March 23, 2023. (https://
27. main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/
28. NFHS-5_Phase-II_0.pdf).
29. NOVA et al.
30. Kang, S.W., Rahman, M. S., Kim, A. N., Lee, K.
31. Y., Park, C. Y., Kerr, W. L and Choi, S, G.
32. Comparative study of the quality
33. characteristics of defatted soy flour treated
34. by supercritical carbon dioxide and organic
35. solvent. Journal of Food Science and
36. Technology. 54(8):2485-2493.
37. Kumar, P., Chatli, M. K., Mehta, N., Singh, P.,
38. Malav, O. P and Verma, A. K. 2017. Meat
39. analogues: health promising sustainable
40. meat substitutes. Critical Reviews in Food
41. Science and Nutrition. 57(5): 923-932.
42. Langelaan, M.L.P., Boonen, K.J.M., Polak, R.B.,
43. Baaijens, F.P.T., Post, M.J and Van der
44. Schaft, D.W.J. 2010. Meet the new meat:
45. Tissue engineered skeletal muscle. Trends
46. in Food Science and Technology. 21:
47. –66.
48. Malik, M. A and Saini, C.S. 2018. Improvement
49. of functional properties of sunflower
50. protein isolates near isoelectric point:
51. Application of heat treatment. LWT-Food
52. Science and Technology. 98: 411-417.
53. Maray, Ahmed, R. M, Mostafa, K. Mostafa., Alaa
54. El Din, M. A and El Fakhrany. 2018. Effect
55. of pretreatments and drying methods on
56. physico chemical, sensory characteristics
57. and nutritional value of oyster mushroom.
58. Journal of Food Processing and
59. Preservation. 42(1): e13352.
60. Odoemelam, S. A. 2005. Functional properties
61. of raw and heat processed jackfruit
62. (Artocarpus heterophyllus) flour. Pakistan
63. Journal of Nutrition. 4(6):366-370.
64. Ragone, D. 2014. Breadfruit nutritional value
65. and versatility. Breadfruit Institute of the
66. National Tropical Botanical Garden and
67. Hawaii Homegrown Food Network, State of
68. Hawaii Department of Agriculture.
69. Retrieved from the website (https://
70. hdoa.hawaii.gov/add/files/2014/05/
71. Breadfruit-Nutrition-Fact-Sheet.pdf) on
72. 2.2023.
73. Rana, S. S., Pradhan, R. C and Mishra, S. 2019.
74. Image analysis to quantify the browning in
75. fresh cut tender jackfruit slices. Food
76. Chemistry. 278: 185-189.
77. Rohrmann, S., Overvad, K., Bueno-de-Mesquita,
78. H. B., Jakobsen, M. U., Egeberg, R.,
79. Tjonneland, A., Nailler, L., Boutron-Ruault,
80. M.C., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Krogh, V and
81. Palli, D. 2013. Meat consumption and
82. mortality-results from the European
83. prospective investigation into cancer and
84. nutrition. BioMed Central Medicine. 11(1):
85. -12.
86. Samtiya, M., Aluko, R.E and Dhewa, T. 2020.
87. Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their
88. reduction strategies: an overview. Food
89. Production, Processing and Nutrition (2):
90. -7.
91. Singh, M., Trivedi, N., Enamala, M. K., Kuppam,
92. C., Parikh, P., Nikolova, M. P and Chavali,
93. M. 2021. Plant-based meat analogue
94. (PBMA) as a sustainable food: A concise
95. review. European Food Research and
96. Technology. 247(10): 2499-2526.
97. Sultana, A., Parvin, R., Alam, M.K., Akter, F and
98. Alim, M.A., 2015. Physico-chemical,
99. functional properties and storage
100. characteristics of jackfruit seed
101. flour. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary
102. and Animal Sciences. 3(1):20-25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
