EXPRESSION OF CHITINASE AND -1,3-GLUCANASES IN RICE CULTIVARS IN REACTION TO Rhizoctonia solani,THE CAUSAL AGENT OF RICE SHEATH BLIGHT


462 / 110

Authors

  • SURESH MADUGULA Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110 012
  • PARIMAL K. SINHA Division of Plant Pathology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi- 110 012

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.01

Keywords:

-1,3-glucanase, Chitinase, Disease resistance, Pathogenesis related Proteins (PRPs), Rhizoctonia solani, Rice, Sheath blight

Abstract

Fifteen high yielding rice cultivars were screened for their reaction to sheath blight under field as well as semi-controlled conditions inoculated with the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Expression of two pathogenesis related proteins (PRPs), Chitinase and -1,3-glucanases activities were estimated. Both chitinase and 1,3-glucanase PR proteins activity in terms of specific activity expressed after 72 h of pathogen inoculation was generally higher in tolerant cultivars (NLR 145, MTU 1061, NLR 3238, MTU 1153) including checks (TETEP and MTU 1001) as compared to control (MTU 7029) and other susceptible cultivars. The presence of a 33 kDachitinase and 32 kDa and -1,3-glucanase proteins was revealed by western blot analysis, across all the rice cultivars following Rhizoctonia solani infection. No significant grain yield difference in relation to the expression of PRPs was observed across the test rice cultivars.

References

1. Abeles, F.B., Bosshart, R.P., Forrence, L.E

2. and Habig, W.E. 1970. Preparation and

3. purification of glucanase and chitinase from

4. bean leaves. Plant Physiology. 47: 129–

5. Anand, A., Lei, Z.T., Summer, L.W., Mysore, K.S.,

6. Arakane, Y., Backus, W.W and

7. Muthukrishnan. S. 2004. Apoplastic extracts

8. from a transgenic wheat line exhibiting

9. lesion-mimic phenotype have multiple

10. pathogenesis related proteins that are

11. a n t i f u n g a l . P l a n t - M i c r o b e

12. Interactions.17:1306-1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn019

13. Berger, L.R and Reynolds, D.M. 1958. The

14. chitinase system of a strain of Streptomyces

15. griseus. Biochem Biophys Acta. 29:522534.

16. Bonman, J. M., Khush, G. S and Nelson, R. J.

17. Breeding rice for resistance to pests.

18. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 30:507–

19. Broglie, K., Chet, I., Holliday, M., Cressman, R.,

20. Biddle, P., Knowlton, S., Maurais, C.J and

21. Broglie, R. 1991. Transgenic plants withenhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen

22. Rhizoctonia solani. Science. 254:1194-1197.

23. Datta, K., Tu, J.M., Oliva, N., Ona, I., Velazhahan,

24. R., Mew, T.W., Muthu krishnan, S and Datta,

25. S.K. 2001. Enhanced resistance to sheath

26. blight by constitutive expression of infection

27. related rice chitinase in transgenic elite

28. Indica rice cultivars. Plant Science. 160:

29. –414.

30. Graham, M.Y., Weidner, J., Wheeler, K., Pelow,

31. M.L and Graham, T.L. 2003. Induced

32. expression of pathogenesis-related protein

33. genes in soybean by wounding and the

34. Phytophthorasojae cell wall glucan elicitor.

35. Physiological and Molecular Plant

36. Pathology. 63:141–149.

37. Gupta, P., Ravi, I and Sharma, V. 2013. Induction

38. of -1,3-glucanase and chitinase activity in

39. the defense response of Eruca sativa plants

40. against the fungal pathogen Alternaria

41. brassicicola. Journal of Plant Interactions.

42. ( 2 ) : 1 5 5 - 1 6 1 . D O I : 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 /

43. 2012.679705.

44. Ham, K.S., Kauffmann, S., Albersheim, P and

45. Darvill, A.G. 1991.Host pathogen

46. interactions. XXXIX. A soybean pathogenesis

47. related protein with -1,3-glucanase activity

48. releases phytoalexin elicitoractive heatstable

49. fragments from fungal walls.

50. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 4:545-

51. Hein, M. 1990. Reaction of germplasms to sheath

52. blight of rice. Myanmar Journal of Agricultural

53. Science. 2: 1–12.

54. IRRI, 2002. Standard evaluation system for rice.

55. INGER. Genetic Resources Center, IRRI,

56. Manila. pp. 20–21.

57. Jain, D and Khurana, J.P. 2018. Role of

58. pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins in plant

59. defense mechanism A. Singh, I. K. Singh

60. (Eds.); Molecular Aspects of Plant-Pathogen

61. Interaction.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-

62. -7371-7_12. pp. 265-281.

63. Kalpana, K., Maruthasalam, S., Rajesh, T.,

64. Poovannan, K., Kumar, K. K., Kokiladevi, E.,

65. Raja J.A.J., Sudhakar, D., Velazhahan, R.,

66. Samiyappan, R and Balasubramanian, P.

67. Engineering sheath blight resistance

68. in elite indica rice cultivars using genes

69. encoding defense proteins. Plant Science.

70. : 203–215.

71. Kombrink, E., Ancillo, G., Buchter, R., Dietrich,

72. J., Hoegen, E., Ponath, Y., Schmelzer, E.,

73. Stromberg, A and Wegener, S. 2001. The role

74. of chitinases in plant defense and plant

75. development. 6th international workshop on

76. PR proteins. May 20-24, 2001, Spa,

77. Belgium. Book of Abstracts. pp.11-12.

78. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins

79. during the assembly of the head of

80. bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:680-685.

81. Mauch, F., Mauch-Mani, B and Boller, T. 1988.

82. Antifungal hydrolases in pea tissue. II.

83. Inhibition of fungal growth by combinations

84. of chitinase and --1,3-glucanase. Plant

85. Physiology. 88: 936-942.

86. Nelson N. 1944. A photometric adaption of the

87. Somogyi method for the determination of

88. glucose. Journal of Biological Chemistry.

89. : 375-380.

90. Reissig, J.L., Strominger, J.L and Leloir, L.F. 1955.

91. A modified colorimetric method for the

92. estimation of N-acetylamino sugars. Journal

93. of Biological Chemistry. 217: 959-966.

94. Shrestha, C. L., Oña I., Muthukrishnan, S and

95. Mew. T. W. 2008. Chitinase levels in rice

96. cultivars correlate with resistance to the

97. sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia

98. solani. European Journal of Plant

99. Pathology. 120:69–77. DOI: 10.1007/

100. s10658-007-9199-4

101. Somogyi, M. 1952. Notes on sugar determination. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50870-5

102. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 195:19-23.Van loon, L. C., Rep, M and Pieterse, C. M. J.

103. Significance of inducible defenserelated

104. proteins in infected plants. Annual

105. Review of Phytopathology. 44: 135–162.

106. Velazhahan, R and Muthukrishnan, S.2004.

107. Transgenic tobacco plants constitutively

108. overexpressing a rice thaumatinlike protein

109. (PR-5) show enhanced resistance to

110. Alternaria alternata. Biologia Plantarum. 47:

111. -354.

112. Vidhyasekaran, P. 1997. Fungal pathogenesis in

113. plants and crops. New York (NY): Marcel

114. Dekker Inc. pp. 553.

115. Ward, E.R., Uknes, S.J., Williams, S.C., Dincher,

116. S.S., Wiederhold, D.L., Alexander. D.C.,

117. Ahl-Goy, P., Me´traux, J.P and Ryals, J.A.

118. Coordinate gene activity in response

119. to agents that induce systemic acquired

120. resistance. Plant Cell. 3:1085-1094.

121. Wessels, J.G.H and Sietsma, J.H. 1981. Fungal

122. cell walls: A survey. In: Tanner, W., Louewus

123. F.A., Editors. Encyclopedia of Plant

124. Physiology. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.

125. New Series. pp. 352-394.

126. Wheeler, B.E.J. 1969. An Introduction to Plant

127. Diseases. John Wiley and Sons Limited,

128. New York. pp.1-374.

129. Wubben, J. P., Lawrence, C. B and De Wit, P. J.

130. G. M. 1996. Differential induction of chitinase

131. and 1,3- -glucanase gene expression in

132. tomato by Cladosporium fulvum and its racespecific

133. elicitors. Physiological and

134. Molecular Plant Pathology. 48:105–116.

Downloads

Published

05-10-2023

How to Cite

SURESH MADUGULA, & PARIMAL K. SINHA. (2023). EXPRESSION OF CHITINASE AND -1,3-GLUCANASES IN RICE CULTIVARS IN REACTION TO Rhizoctonia solani,THE CAUSAL AGENT OF RICE SHEATH BLIGHT. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 51(3), 05-13. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.01