EXPRESSION OF CHITINASE AND -1,3-GLUCANASES IN RICE CULTIVARS IN REACTION TO Rhizoctonia solani,THE CAUSAL AGENT OF RICE SHEATH BLIGHT
462 / 110
Keywords:
-1,3-glucanase, Chitinase, Disease resistance, Pathogenesis related Proteins (PRPs), Rhizoctonia solani, Rice, Sheath blightAbstract
Fifteen high yielding rice cultivars were screened for their reaction to sheath blight under field as well as semi-controlled conditions inoculated with the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Expression of two pathogenesis related proteins (PRPs), Chitinase and -1,3-glucanases activities were estimated. Both chitinase and 1,3-glucanase PR proteins activity in terms of specific activity expressed after 72 h of pathogen inoculation was generally higher in tolerant cultivars (NLR 145, MTU 1061, NLR 3238, MTU 1153) including checks (TETEP and MTU 1001) as compared to control (MTU 7029) and other susceptible cultivars. The presence of a 33 kDachitinase and 32 kDa and -1,3-glucanase proteins was revealed by western blot analysis, across all the rice cultivars following Rhizoctonia solani infection. No significant grain yield difference in relation to the expression of PRPs was observed across the test rice cultivars.
References
1. Abeles, F.B., Bosshart, R.P., Forrence, L.E
2. and Habig, W.E. 1970. Preparation and
3. purification of glucanase and chitinase from
4. bean leaves. Plant Physiology. 47: 129–
5. Anand, A., Lei, Z.T., Summer, L.W., Mysore, K.S.,
6. Arakane, Y., Backus, W.W and
7. Muthukrishnan. S. 2004. Apoplastic extracts
8. from a transgenic wheat line exhibiting
9. lesion-mimic phenotype have multiple
10. pathogenesis related proteins that are
11. a n t i f u n g a l . P l a n t - M i c r o b e
12. Interactions.17:1306-1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn019
13. Berger, L.R and Reynolds, D.M. 1958. The
14. chitinase system of a strain of Streptomyces
15. griseus. Biochem Biophys Acta. 29:522534.
16. Bonman, J. M., Khush, G. S and Nelson, R. J.
17. Breeding rice for resistance to pests.
18. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 30:507–
19. Broglie, K., Chet, I., Holliday, M., Cressman, R.,
20. Biddle, P., Knowlton, S., Maurais, C.J and
21. Broglie, R. 1991. Transgenic plants withenhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen
22. Rhizoctonia solani. Science. 254:1194-1197.
23. Datta, K., Tu, J.M., Oliva, N., Ona, I., Velazhahan,
24. R., Mew, T.W., Muthu krishnan, S and Datta,
25. S.K. 2001. Enhanced resistance to sheath
26. blight by constitutive expression of infection
27. related rice chitinase in transgenic elite
28. Indica rice cultivars. Plant Science. 160:
29. –414.
30. Graham, M.Y., Weidner, J., Wheeler, K., Pelow,
31. M.L and Graham, T.L. 2003. Induced
32. expression of pathogenesis-related protein
33. genes in soybean by wounding and the
34. Phytophthorasojae cell wall glucan elicitor.
35. Physiological and Molecular Plant
36. Pathology. 63:141–149.
37. Gupta, P., Ravi, I and Sharma, V. 2013. Induction
38. of -1,3-glucanase and chitinase activity in
39. the defense response of Eruca sativa plants
40. against the fungal pathogen Alternaria
41. brassicicola. Journal of Plant Interactions.
42. ( 2 ) : 1 5 5 - 1 6 1 . D O I : 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 /
43. 2012.679705.
44. Ham, K.S., Kauffmann, S., Albersheim, P and
45. Darvill, A.G. 1991.Host pathogen
46. interactions. XXXIX. A soybean pathogenesis
47. related protein with -1,3-glucanase activity
48. releases phytoalexin elicitoractive heatstable
49. fragments from fungal walls.
50. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 4:545-
51. Hein, M. 1990. Reaction of germplasms to sheath
52. blight of rice. Myanmar Journal of Agricultural
53. Science. 2: 1–12.
54. IRRI, 2002. Standard evaluation system for rice.
55. INGER. Genetic Resources Center, IRRI,
56. Manila. pp. 20–21.
57. Jain, D and Khurana, J.P. 2018. Role of
58. pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins in plant
59. defense mechanism A. Singh, I. K. Singh
60. (Eds.); Molecular Aspects of Plant-Pathogen
61. Interaction.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
62. -7371-7_12. pp. 265-281.
63. Kalpana, K., Maruthasalam, S., Rajesh, T.,
64. Poovannan, K., Kumar, K. K., Kokiladevi, E.,
65. Raja J.A.J., Sudhakar, D., Velazhahan, R.,
66. Samiyappan, R and Balasubramanian, P.
67. Engineering sheath blight resistance
68. in elite indica rice cultivars using genes
69. encoding defense proteins. Plant Science.
70. : 203–215.
71. Kombrink, E., Ancillo, G., Buchter, R., Dietrich,
72. J., Hoegen, E., Ponath, Y., Schmelzer, E.,
73. Stromberg, A and Wegener, S. 2001. The role
74. of chitinases in plant defense and plant
75. development. 6th international workshop on
76. PR proteins. May 20-24, 2001, Spa,
77. Belgium. Book of Abstracts. pp.11-12.
78. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins
79. during the assembly of the head of
80. bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:680-685.
81. Mauch, F., Mauch-Mani, B and Boller, T. 1988.
82. Antifungal hydrolases in pea tissue. II.
83. Inhibition of fungal growth by combinations
84. of chitinase and --1,3-glucanase. Plant
85. Physiology. 88: 936-942.
86. Nelson N. 1944. A photometric adaption of the
87. Somogyi method for the determination of
88. glucose. Journal of Biological Chemistry.
89. : 375-380.
90. Reissig, J.L., Strominger, J.L and Leloir, L.F. 1955.
91. A modified colorimetric method for the
92. estimation of N-acetylamino sugars. Journal
93. of Biological Chemistry. 217: 959-966.
94. Shrestha, C. L., Oña I., Muthukrishnan, S and
95. Mew. T. W. 2008. Chitinase levels in rice
96. cultivars correlate with resistance to the
97. sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia
98. solani. European Journal of Plant
99. Pathology. 120:69–77. DOI: 10.1007/
100. s10658-007-9199-4
101. Somogyi, M. 1952. Notes on sugar determination. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50870-5
102. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 195:19-23.Van loon, L. C., Rep, M and Pieterse, C. M. J.
103. Significance of inducible defenserelated
104. proteins in infected plants. Annual
105. Review of Phytopathology. 44: 135–162.
106. Velazhahan, R and Muthukrishnan, S.2004.
107. Transgenic tobacco plants constitutively
108. overexpressing a rice thaumatinlike protein
109. (PR-5) show enhanced resistance to
110. Alternaria alternata. Biologia Plantarum. 47:
111. -354.
112. Vidhyasekaran, P. 1997. Fungal pathogenesis in
113. plants and crops. New York (NY): Marcel
114. Dekker Inc. pp. 553.
115. Ward, E.R., Uknes, S.J., Williams, S.C., Dincher,
116. S.S., Wiederhold, D.L., Alexander. D.C.,
117. Ahl-Goy, P., Me´traux, J.P and Ryals, J.A.
118. Coordinate gene activity in response
119. to agents that induce systemic acquired
120. resistance. Plant Cell. 3:1085-1094.
121. Wessels, J.G.H and Sietsma, J.H. 1981. Fungal
122. cell walls: A survey. In: Tanner, W., Louewus
123. F.A., Editors. Encyclopedia of Plant
124. Physiology. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
125. New Series. pp. 352-394.
126. Wheeler, B.E.J. 1969. An Introduction to Plant
127. Diseases. John Wiley and Sons Limited,
128. New York. pp.1-374.
129. Wubben, J. P., Lawrence, C. B and De Wit, P. J.
130. G. M. 1996. Differential induction of chitinase
131. and 1,3- -glucanase gene expression in
132. tomato by Cladosporium fulvum and its racespecific
133. elicitors. Physiological and
134. Molecular Plant Pathology. 48:105–116.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.