PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HEXACOPTER UAV (ANGRAU- PUSHPAK) SPRAYING FOR MANAGEMENT OF CHILLI THRIPS (Thrips parvispinus)


798 / 164

Authors

  • A. SAMBAIAH Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034
  • L. PRASANTHI Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034
  • CH MADHURI Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034
  • K. PURNA CHANDRA RAO Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034
  • N. KAMAKSHI Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034
  • N.VENKATA LAKSHMI Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034
  • K. GURAVA REDDY Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.08

Keywords:

Chilli, Fipronil 80% WG, Spinetoram 11.7% SC, Spirotetramat 25.31% w/w OD, Flubendiamide 19.92% + Thiacloprid 19.92% SC, Thrips parvispinus, UAV spraying

Abstract

The study aimed at evaluating efficacy of UAV spraying in managing invasive thrips, Thrips parvispinus on chilli. The experiment was conducted at operational research project (ORP) site at Lam village of Guntur district during kharif 2022-23 with restricted randomized block design. The recommended doses of pesticides issued by Central Insecticide Board and Registration Committee(CIB&RC), GoI, New Delhi were adapted. The treatments imposed were of 100%, 75% and 50% RDP with UAV and 100% RDP with human backpack sprayer and a control plot with only water spraying with drone for asserting the efficacy of drone spraying when sprayed at low volume spraying (25 L ha-1).The first spray to control thrips was carried out 112 DAS (Days After Sowing) with a spinetoram 11.7% SC on with analysis of pre and post spraying (5 days after spraying) results showed that the bio-efficacy when sprayed with 100% RDP (T1), 75% RDP(T2), 50% RDP (T3) with drone and 100% RDP with human back pack sprayer (T4) and control(T5)reduced number of thrips per flower from 7.57 to 5.8, 7.55 to 6.40, 7.55 to 10.22, 8.05 to 8.22, 8.05 to 12.95, respectively with a percent reduction over control of 50.75, 46.19, 23.65 and 36.57, respectively. The second spray was carried out at 119 DAS with Flubendiamide 19.92% +Thiacloprid 19.92% SC. The pre and post spraying (5 days after spraying) data analysis revealed that the reduction of thrips per flower over control in T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 to 7.37, 8.32, 12.12, 10.25 and 16.03 and the percent reduction over control in T1, T2, T3 and T4 are 52.22%, 44.88%, 24.29% and 36.78%, respectively. The third spray with Fipronil 80% WG was carried out at 126 DAS and the pre and post spraying data analysis revealed that the number of thrips per flower are 5.27, 6.47, 10.55, 8.05 and 16.83 with a percent reduction over control of 68.83, 62.34, 22.08 and 38.96, respectively. The fourth spray was carried out at 133 DAS with spirotetramat 25.31% w/w OD and the pre and post spray data analysis revealed that the number of thrips per flower are of 5.12, 5.75, 9.5, 8.5 and 18.22 in T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 and the percent reduction over control in T1, T2, T3 and T4 are 66.59, 61.68, 40.89 and 46.92, respectively. During the four sprays, it was observed that in all treatments, there was no phytotoxicity due to these chemicals spraying and the NDVI values recorded were 0.77, 0.76, 0.64, 0.72 and 0.34, respectively in the treatments T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5. The yields recorded were found to be 58.6, 55.2, 34.5, 53.8 and 14.1 q ha-1. The incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICBR) was found to be highest (4.46) in 75% RDP spray with drone, when compared to 3.58 in 100% RDP, 2.82 in 50% RDP and 2.98 in 100%RDP with human backpack sprayer respectively. The bio-efficacy of all the chemicals revealed that 100% RDP and 75% RDP sprayed with drone are on par with each other, which offers an opportunity to reduce the dosage by25% if sprayed with drone for the same bio-efficacy with highest ICBR.

References

1. Anitha Kumari, D., Bhasker, K and Suresh, V.

2. A new invasive chillithrips (Thrips

3. parvispinus) in Telangana State. Insect

4. Environment. 24(4): 520-522.

5. Chilli Outlook.2021. January- December 2021.

6. Agriculture Market Intelligence Centre,

7. ANGRAU, Guntur.

8. Deepak Kumar, Kamal Ravi Sharma and Raju.

9. S.V.S. 2019. Field efficacy of insecticidal

10. combinations against chillithrips,

11. Scirtothrips dorsalis (Hood) and Aphis

12. gossypii (Glover). Annals of Plant

13. Protection Sciences.27 (3): 324-328.

14. Fleming, R and Ratnakaran, A. 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-1985-31378

15. Evaluating single treatment data using

16. Abbot’s formula with modification.

17. Journal of Economic Entomology.

18. :1179.

19. Italiya, J. V., Kalasariya, R. L., Dodiya, R. D.,

20. Barad, A. H and Patel, N. A. 2023.

21. Economically management of thrips by

22. insecticides in chilli under field

23. condition.The Pharma Innovation

24. Journal. 12(4): 1371-1374.

25. Kotresh, S., Raghuraman, M and Srushtideep,

26. A. 2020. Management of chilli thrips

27. using newer formulations. Journal of

28. Entomology and Zoology Studies. 8(4):

29. -673.

30. Mandal, L andMondal, P. 2022. Bio-efficacy of

31. some newer generation insecticides

32. against chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis

33. Hood. International Journal of Bio-

34. Resource & Stress Management. 13(11):

35. -1140.

36. Matharu, K. S andTanwar, P. S. 2020.

37. Bioefficacy of novel insecticides against

38. cotton thrips, Thrips tabaci

39. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). International

40. Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(3): 1167-

41. Nagaraju, D.K., VivekUppar., Ranjith, M.,

42. Sriharsha Ramesh, G., Om Prakash

43. Verma and Ravi Prakash. 2021

44. Occurrence of Thrips parvispinus (Karny)

45. (Thripidae: Thysanoptera) in major chilli

46. (Capsicum annum) growing areas of

47. Karnataka. Insect Environment. 24(4):

48. - 532.

49. Phang, S. K., Li, K., Chen, B. M., Lee, T. H.,

50. Valavanis, K. P and Vachtsevanos, G. J.

51. Systematic design methodology

52. and construction of micro aerial

53. quadrotor vehicles. Handbook of

54. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. The

55. Netherlands. pp.181–206.

56. Rashmi, M. A, Sireesha, Kand Verghese. A.

57. Need for surveillance in case of

58. the invasive thrips, Thrips parvispinus

59. (Karny) on chilli (Capsicum annuum)

60. (including IPM recommendations). Insect

61. Environment. 25 (2):60-61.

62. Sharanappa, C. H., Katti, P., Arunkumar, H.,

63. Sushila, N., Desai, B. K and Pampanna,

64. Y. 2020. Evaluation of insecticides

65. against thrips (Thripidae: Thysanoptera)

66. and mites (Tarsonemidae:

67. Trombidiformes) infesting capsicum.

68. Journal of Entomology and Zoology

69. Studies. 8(2): 1221-1225.

70. Shimokawatoko, Y., Sato, N., Yamaguchi, Y and

71. Tanaka, H. 2012. Development of the

72. novel insecticide spinetoram

73. (Diana®). Sumitomo Kagaku. pp.14-15.

74. Singh, V., Verma, J. R., Bhati, D. S., Kumar, S

75. and Sanp, R. K. 2012. Bioefficacy of

76. Spinetoram 12% SC against thrips and

77. boll worm complex on Cotton. Journal of

78. Progressive Agriculture. 3(1): 66-68.

79. Sireesha, K., Prasanna, B. V. L., Vijaya

80. Lakshmi, T and Reddy, R. V. S. K. 2021.

81. Outbreak of invasive thrips species

82. Thrips parvispinus in chilli growing areas

83. of Andhra Pradesh. Insect

84. Environment. 24(4): 514-519.

85. Tyagi, K., Kumar, V., Singha, D and

86. Chakraborty, R. 2015. Morphological

87. and DNA barcoding evidence for invasive

88. pest thrips, Thrips parvispinus

89. (Thripidae: Thysanoptera), newly

90. recorded from India. Journal of Insect

91. Science. 15(1):105-106. DoI: https://

92. doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev087

Downloads

Published

05-10-2023

How to Cite

A. SAMBAIAH, L. PRASANTHI, CH MADHURI, K. PURNA CHANDRA RAO, N. KAMAKSHI, N.VENKATA LAKSHMI, & K. GURAVA REDDY. (2023). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HEXACOPTER UAV (ANGRAU- PUSHPAK) SPRAYING FOR MANAGEMENT OF CHILLI THRIPS (Thrips parvispinus). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 51(3), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.08