PROCESS OPTIMIZATION AND EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF THE BARNYARD MILLET INCORPORATED SYNBIOTIC YOGHURT
523 / 225
Authors
-
U. A. AMRUTHA*
Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur- 680 656
-
C. L. SHARON, P. SEEJA THOMACHAN, P. S. LAKSHMY and A. K. BEENA
Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur – 680 656
Keywords:
Barnyard Millet, Inulin, L. acidophilus, Polydextrose, Probiotic, YoghurtAbstract
The study was conducted for three years (2019-2022) to optimize and evaluate the three treatments with various combinations of barnyard millet and other ingredients. Several combinations were tried, among which 50% milk and 50% barnyard millet slurry with 3% of inulin and 3% polydextrose was selected as the best with mean sores for overall acceptability of 8.72 for probiotic yoghurt, 8.85 for inulin and 8.75 for
polydextrose added synbiotic yoghurts. The viability of L. acidophilus was 11.15 log CFU/ml for probiotic, 11.16 log CFU/ml for inulin added synbiotic yoghurt and 11.17 log CFU/ml for polydextrose added probiotic yoghurt. The nutrients of synbiotic barnyard millet based yoghurt along with inulin and polydextrose added yoghurt were assessedand it was found to have major nutrients of carbohydrate 8.58 g/100 g , 8.47 g/100 g and 8.41 g/100 g, protein content of 3.52 g/100g, 3.63 g/100 g and 3.61 g/100 g, fat content of 0.63 g/100 g, 0.69 g/100 g and 0.66 g/100 g.
References
1. Abd Rabou, H.S., Shehata, M.G., Sohaimy, S.A
2. and Awad, S. A. 2020. Functional probiotic
3. quinoa camel milk kishk. Journal of Food
4. Processing and Preservation. 44(9): 1-8.
5. Agarwal, G.P. and Hasija, S.K. 1986.
6. Microorganisms in the Laboratory.Print
7. house India Ltd, Lucknow. pp.155.
8. Al-Shawi, S.G. 2020. The possibility of producing
9. synbiotic yogurt containing mint
10. extracts. Eurasian Journal of Medical and
11. Biological Sciences. 14 (1): 13-21.
12. Alwis, A.D.P.S., Perera, O.D.A.N and Weerahewa,
13. H. L. D. 2015. Development of carrot-based
14. synbiotic beverage. Journal of Agricultural
15. Science. 11 (3): 178-186.
16. Falah, F., Vasiee, A., Alizadeh B.B., Tabatabaee
17. Y.F and Mortazavi, S. A. 2021. Preparation
18. and functional properties of synbiotic yoghurt
19. fermented with Lactobacillus brevis PML1
20. derived from a fermented cereal-dairy
21. product. BioMed Research
22. International. 9(6): 3317-3326.
23. Hauly, M.C.D.O., Fuchs, R.H.B and Prudencio-
24. Ferreira, S.H. 2015. Soymilk yogurt
25. supplemented with fructooligosaccharides:
26. Probiotic properties and acceptance. Journal
27. of Nutrition. 18 (5): 613-622.
28. Huang, L., Abdel-Hamidb, M., Romeihb, E., Zenga,
29. Q., Yanga, P., Walkerc, G and Li, L. 2020.
30. Textural and organoleptic properties of fatfree
31. buffalo yogurt as affected by
32. polydextrose. International Journal of Food
33. Properties. 23(1) 1-8.
34. Malarkannan, S. P. 2019. Development of cultured
35. low fat synbiotic buttermilk. Ph.D. thesis
36. submitted to Agriculture and Animal
37. Husbandry University, Dindigul. pp.126.Mariammal, S. 2016. Development of synbiotic
38. acidophilus milk. Ph. D.thesis submitted to
39. Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
40. Abhishekapatti. pp.74-75.
41. Priya, S. N. 2018. Development and evaluation of
42. probiotic juices fortified with nutraceuticals.
43. Ph. D. thesis submitted to Anna University,
44. Chennai. pp.104.
45. Reshma, E.K., Geetha, R., Lejaniya, A.S and
46. Sathian, C.T. 2022. Development and quality
47. evaluation of synbiotic yoghurt incorporated
48. with oat flour and Bifidobacterium bifidum
49. NCDC-255. Indian Journal of Science and
50. Technology. 15(17): 811-818.
51. Sarabhai, S. 2012. Standardization and quality
52. evaluation of rice based fermented dairy
53. products. M.Sc. thesis submitted to Kerala
54. Agricultural University, Thrissur. pp.103.
55. Sukarminah, E., Lanti, I., Wulandari, E., Lembong,
56. E and Utami, R. 2019. The effect of sorghum
57. flour (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) addition
58. to characteristic quality of goat milk synbiotic
59. yoghurt candidate. Environmental Earth
60. Sciences. 347 (1): 120-130.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
