ANALYSIS OF JOB SATISFACTION OF TEA PLANTATION WORKERS OF KERALA USING A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING APPROACH


651 / 150

Authors

  • ARYA V. CHANDRAN*, DIGVIJAY SINGH DHAKRE, DEBASIS BHATTACHARYA AND KADER ALI SARKAR Department of Agricultural Statistics, Palli Siksha Bhavan, Visva-Bharati University, Sriniketan-731 236

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.16

Keywords:

Exploratory factor analysis, Job satisfaction, Structural equation modelling, Tea plantation workers

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the effects of different factors on job satisfaction of tea plantation workers. Like any other industry, the satisfaction of labours have significant role in the development of tea industry. The tea plantation workers in India are covered by Plantation Labour Act (PLA) 1951, which prescribes the standards of working and living conditions. The data regarding the satisfaction of different factors including working and living conditions were collected from 400 respondents of Kerala through structured interview schedule. To determine the influence of various factors influencing job satisfaction, appropriate statistical approaches, such as Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) technologies, were employed.The goodness of fit for the fitted model was checked by fitness indices. Using SEM, it was observed that the company’s provision of facilities such housing, water, electricity, protective clothing, health care, and recreational activities has an effect on the job satisfaction of plantation workers.

References

1. Byrne, B.M. 2016. Structural equation modeling

2. with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications,

3. and programming. 3rd Edition. Routledge.

4. New York. pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.4324/

5. Elangovan, N and Rajendran, R. 2015. Structural

6. equation modeling- A second-generation

7. multivariate analysis. 3rd National Confernce

8. on Indian Business Management. January

9. , 2015. Coimbatore. Available at

10. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3515941

11. Fan, Y., Chen, J., Shirkey, G., John, R., Wu, S.

12. R., Park, H and Shao, C. 2016. Applications

13. of structural equation modeling (SEM) in

14. ecological studies: an updated

15. review. Ecological Processes. 5(19): 1-12.

16. Goforth, C. 2015. Using and interpreting Cronbach’s

17. alpha. Research Data Services + Sciences.

18. Retrieved from the website (https://

19. data.library.virginia.edu/using-andinterpreting-

20. cronbachs-alpha) on 14.4.2023.

21. Gupta, R. K., Saha, A and Dhakre, D. S. 2022.

22. Perception of tribal and non-tribal dairy

23. farmers towards the dairy farming in

24. Chhattisgarh state: structural equation

25. modeling approach. The Journal of Research

26. ANGRAU. 50(4): 100-115.

27. Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. S and Patel, V. K.

28. AMOS covariance-based structural

29. equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on

30. its application as a marketing research tool.

31. Brazilian Journal of Marketing. 13(2): 44-55.

32. Hair, J., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J and Anderson,

33. R.E. 2018. Multivariate data analysis.

34. Cengage Learning. 8th Edition,United

35. Kingdom. pp. 834.

36. Kumar, S. S. 2018. A study on the impact of current

37. crisis in tea industry on the plantation

38. workers in Kerala. Project report submitted

39. to Kerala Institute of Labour and

40. Employment, Tiruvanathapuram. pp.1-118.

41. Loehlin, J.C and Beaujean, A.A. 2017. Latent

42. variable models: An introduction to factor,

43. path, and structural equation analysis. 5th

44. Edition. Routledge. New York. pp. 95-131.

45. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315643199

46. Muller, R. O and Hancock, G. R. 2018. Structural

47. equation modeling. In: Hancock, G.R.,

48. Stapleton, L.M and Mueller, R.O. (Eds.). The

49. reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in

50. the social sciences. 2nd Edition. Routledge.

51. New York. pp. 445-456. https://doi.org/

52. 4324/9781315755649

53. Priyadarshan, S. 2019. Workers satisfaction on

54. the facilities provided by the plantation

55. companies- with special reference to Kerala

56. state. Journal of Management. 6(3):157-178.

57. UmutUnal. 2021. Structural equation modeling as

58. a marketing research tool: A guideline for

59. SEM users about critical issues and

60. problematic practices. Journal of Statistics

61. and Applied Science. 2(2): 65-77.

Downloads

Published

05-10-2023

How to Cite

ARYA V. CHANDRAN*, DIGVIJAY SINGH DHAKRE, DEBASIS BHATTACHARYA AND KADER ALI SARKAR. (2023). ANALYSIS OF JOB SATISFACTION OF TEA PLANTATION WORKERS OF KERALA USING A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING APPROACH. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 51(3), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.3.16