PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HEXACOPTER UAV (ANGRAU - PUSHPAK) SPRAYER FOR MANAGEMENT OF LATE LEAF SPOT IN GROUNDNUT CROP


386 / 96

Authors

  • A.SAMBAIAH*, L. PRASANTHI, B.SREE LAKSHMI, CH. MADHURI, K. PURNA CHANDRA RAO, N. VENKATA LAKSHMI AND K. GURAVA REDDY Centre for Andhra Pradesh Sensors and Smart Applications Research in Agriculture (APSARA), Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur- 522 034

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.4.12

Keywords:

Carbendazim, Groundnut, Hexaconazole, Mancozeb, Late leaf spot, UAV sprayer

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of low volume UAV sprayer (25 L ha-1) for controlling late leaf spot, (Nothopassalora personata) disease of groundnut in Krishna agroclimatic zone of Andhra Pradesh. The experiment was conducted during late rabi season between 2021-2022 and 2022-23. To comprehend the suitability of UAV spraying in groundnut to control late leaf spot, restricted randomised block design (RRBD) was imposed in the field of five acres
with five treatments viz., T1-100%, T2-75% and T3-50% RDP with UAV spraying and T4-100% RDP with human back power sprayer and T5-control plot with only water spraying with UAV. To control late leaf spot, CIB & RC recommended chemicals carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% WP at 61 DAS and followed by hexaconazole 5% EC at 68 DAS were sprayed as per the experimental treatment protocols. The analysis of the data revealed that spray with UAV sprayer is more efficient and precise in application and resulting in better control in late leaf spot foliar damage as the lowest percent disease incidence (PDI) was observed in T1 (24.58) followed by T2 (25.73) and then by T4 (25.88) which were on par with each other and PDI reduction percentages with respect to T5 are of 48.87, 44.65, 44.65 were observed in 2021-22, respectively. Similar results were found during 2022-23, i.e. the lowest PDI was observed in T1 (25.53) followed by T4 (27.75) and then T2 (28.33) which were on par with each other and reduction percentages of 51.20, 50.12, 48.51 were observed, respectively. The economic analysis through incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICBR) revealed that the highest ICBR ratio of 7.99 (T2) and 6.81 (T1) were realised and no phytotoxicity was observed in UAV spraying of fungicides in groundnut at low volume spraying of 25 L ha-1 without compromising the bio-efficacy

References

1. AH, K. N., Divyajyothi, U., Chaithra, G. M and

2. Hanumanthappa, M. 2021. Assessment

3. of natural farming practice against leaf

4. spot (Tikka) disease of summer

5. groundnut under central dry zone of

6. Karnataka. Journal of Pharmacognosy

7. and Phytochemistry. 10 (1S): 73-76.

8. Flemming R, Retnakaran A. 1985. Evaluation

9. of single treatment data using Abbott’s

10. formula with reference to insects. Indian

11. Journal of Economic Zoology. 78:1179-

12. Gadhiya, K. K., Kapadiya, H.J., Akbari, L.F and

13. Janaki Kantibhai, K. 2018. Evaluation of

14. fungicides for management of early leaf

15. SAMBAIAH et al.

16. and late leaf spot of groundnut.

17. International Journal of Chemical Studies.

18. (3): 2718-2721.

19. GoI. 2021. Groundnut Statistical Data- 2021.

20. Production and Yield of Rabi/Kharif in

21. India. Retrieved from the website (https:/

22. /www.indiastat.com/data/agriculture/

23. groundnut/data-year/all-years) on

24. 8.2023.

25. Horsfall, J.G and Henberger, J.W. 1942.

26. Measuring magnitude of defoliation

27. disease of tomatoes. Phytopathology.

28. :226-232.

29. Kumar, V and Thirumalaisamy, P. P. 2016.

30. Diseases of groundnut. Disease of field

31. crops and their management. Indian

32. Phytopathological Society, Today and

33. Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers, New

34. Delhi. pp. 459-487.

35. Patel, J.R., Patel, K.K., Jaiman, R.K and

36. Nakrani, B. R. 2022. Evaluation of

37. fungicide against early leaf spot and late

38. leaf spot of groundnut in field condition.

39. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 11 (6):

40. -1382.

41. Sambaiah, A., Prasanthi, L., Madhuri, Ch.,

42. Purna Chandra Rao, K., Kamakshi,

43. N.,Venkata Lakshmi, N and Gurava

44. Reddy, K. 2023. Performance evaluation

45. of hexacopter UAV (ANGRAU-Pushpak

46. spraying for management of chilli thrips

47. (Thrips parvispinus). The Journal of

48. Research ANGRAU. 51 (3):61-74. DoI:

49. https://doi.org/10.58537/

50. jorangrau.2023.51.3.08

51. Sharma, R. K., Patel, M. M and Patel, D. R.

52. Management of leaf spots or tikka

53. disease of groundnut (Passalora

54. arachidicola and Nothopassalora

55. personata) through systemic fungicides.

56. International Journal of Current

57. Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9

58. (4): 259-265.

Downloads

Published

26-03-2024

How to Cite

A.SAMBAIAH*, L. PRASANTHI, B.SREE LAKSHMI, CH. MADHURI, K. PURNA CHANDRA RAO, N. VENKATA LAKSHMI AND K. GURAVA REDDY. (2024). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HEXACOPTER UAV (ANGRAU - PUSHPAK) SPRAYER FOR MANAGEMENT OF LATE LEAF SPOT IN GROUNDNUT CROP. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 51(4), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2023.51.4.12