COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRENDS, GROWTH, AND INSTABILITY IN THE AREA, PRODUCTION, AND YIELD OF MAIZE IN BIHAR AND KARNATAKA


631 / 125

Authors

  • RAVI KUMAR Department of Economic Studies and Planning, School of Business Studies, Central University of Karnataka (CUK), Kalaburagi-585367, Karnataka, India
  • PUSHPA M. SAVADATTI Department of Economic Studies and Planning, School of Business Studies, Central University of Karnataka (CUK), Kalaburagi-585367, Karnataka, India

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.2.11

Keywords:

Average, Bihar, CAGR, CDVI, Karnataka, Trends

Abstract

The present study has attempted in the year 2022 to analyze maize production trends, growth, and instability in Bihar and Karnataka. Average, Compound Annual Groth Rate (CAGR), and Cuddy Della Valley Index (CDVI) were employed to essess the data from 2002 to 2003 and 2021 to 2022, divided into three periods. As far as kharif maize’s average trend and CAGR of area, production, and yield were concerned, it was dominated by Karnataka during all the periods. For rabi maize, it was dominated by Bihar for the same, but its yield was less than the nation’s yield during both seasons. In case of India, kharif maize’s area and production were much more than the rabi maize, but the yield was low during the entire period for the same. It was also revealed that production growth was due to both the area and yield growth. However, the yield effect was highly significant during all the periods for all the seasons for Bihar, Karnataka, and India. Instability in production for the entire period was more, i.e., 31.32 in Bihar during the kharif season, and it was more in Karnataka, i.e., 22.38 during the rabi season.

References

1. Ayalew, B and Sekar, I. 2016. Trends and

2. regional disparity of maize production in

3. India. Journal of Development and

4. Agricultural Economics, 8(9), 193-199.

5. Economic Survey 2021-22, Government of

6. India; Retrieved from the website (https:/

7. / w w w . i n d i a b u d g e t . g o v . i n /

8. economicsurvey/) on 10.01.2024.

9. Kiran, A. S., Umesh, K. B and Shankara, M. H.

10. (2018). Growth and Instability in

11. Agriculture-A case of maize production

12. in India.

13. Kishore, M. S and Murthy, C. 2016. Growth in

14. area, production and productivity of

15. coconut in Karnataka. International

16. Journal of Commerce and Business

17. Management, 9(2): 156–162. https://

18. doi.org/10.15740/has/ijcbm/9.2/156-162

19. Meera Kumari, L. K. M. 2015. Problems and

20. Prospects of Maize Crop in Estern Zone

21. of Bihar. International Journal of

22. Agricultural Science and Research

23. (IJASR), 5(2): 137–146.

24. Sharma, G and Mehta, S. 2012. Trends,

25. Growth and Instability in Area,

26. Production and Productivity of Maize

27. Crop across Regions in India. 2009.

28. Singh, N. U., Das, K. K and Tripathi, A. R. A. K.

29. Temporal Variation of Maize

30. Production in North Eastern Region of

31. India/ : An Inter-State Comparative Study.

32. Indian Journal of Hill Farming, 31(1):

33. –131.

34. Singh, S. B., Kasana, R. K and Singh, S. P.

35. Status of Corn Cultivation in Bihar/

36. : opportunities and future Challenges

37. National Maize Production Scenario.

38. Yadav, O. P., Prasanna, B. M., Yadava, P., Jat,

39. S. L., Kumar, D., Dhillon, B. S and

40. Sandhu, J. S. 2016. Doubling maize (Zea

41. mays) production of India by 2025–

42. Challenges and opportunities. The

43. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,

44. (4), 427-34.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2024

How to Cite

RAVI KUMAR, & PUSHPA M. SAVADATTI. (2024). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRENDS, GROWTH, AND INSTABILITY IN THE AREA, PRODUCTION, AND YIELD OF MAIZE IN BIHAR AND KARNATAKA. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 52(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.2.11