EFFECTIVE INTROGRESSION OF qDTY3.1 AND qDTY2.1 TO GENETIC BACKGROUND OF A MODERN RICE VARIETY (ADT37) FOR FLOWERING STAGE DROUGHT TOLERANCE BASED ON DROUGHT TOLERANCE DEGREE
335 / 9
Authors
-
P. VIGNESH
Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu), Velur-638182, Namakkal (District), Tamil Nadu, INDIA
-
S. SUNITHA
Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu), Velur-638182, Namakkal (District), Tamil Nadu, INDIA
-
M. KARTHIKA
Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu), Velur-638182, Namakkal (District), Tamil Nadu, INDIA
-
S. BHARATHKUMAR
Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu), Velur-638182, Namakkal (District), Tamil Nadu, INDIA
Keywords:
ADT37, backcrossing,, dry season pressure, dry spell resilience degree, Heterosis,, Leaf drying, qDTY3.1, DTY2.1Abstract
Dry spell pressure is one of the overwhelming abiotic burden in downpour took care of low and upland rice framework. In the current review, a generally cultivable present day rice assortment (ADT37) was improved for dry spell resilience at conceptive stage by consolidating qDTY3.1 and qDTY2.1 locus through marker helped backcross technique during the extended period of 2021- 23. At sub-atomic level, polymorphism was affirmed between beneficiary (ADT37) and giver parent (IR 81869 B-195) with assistance of straightforward arrangement rehash marker. Here, the quality of leaf rolling and leaf drying was utilized to choose positive dry spell plants from backcrossed populace of every age utilizing IRRI’s scale. Plus, plants which are like intermittent parent (RP) at morphological level were additionally browsed chosen positive plants to backcross with RP at every age. Thusly, various ten, eight and nine positive plants were chosen from F1, BC1F1 and BC2F1 populace separately, in view of its elevated degree of dry spell resilience degree (DTD) and heterosis for the quality of leaf drying followed by dry season pressure at vegetative stage. Finally, various two positive plants vagabond ring both qDTY3.1 and qDTY2.1 with heterozygous allelic condition was distinguished from BC3F1 populace utilizing forefront marker (RM520 and RM521) at before self-fertilization. In future, the created close isogonics lines (NILs) of ADT37 rice assortment for the dry season resilience at regenerative stage in view of serious level of dry spell resistance and heterosis would be more powerful under startling high water shortage circumstance to build the grain yield of rice.
References
1. Barik, S.R., Pandit, E., Pradhan,
2. S.K., Mohanty, S.P. and Mohapatara, T.
3. 2019. Genetic mapping of morphophysiological
4. traits involved during
5. reproductive stage drought tolerance in
6. rice. PLoS One, 14 (12), p. e0214979.
7. Dwivedi, P., Ramawat, N., Dhawan, G., Gopala
8. Krishnan, S., Vinod, K.K., Singh, M.P.,
9. Nagarajan, M., Bhowmick, P.K., Mandal,
10. N.P. and Perraju, P. 2021. Drought
11. Tolerant near Isogenic Lines (NILs) of
12. Pusa 44 Developed through Marker
13. Assisted Introgression of qDTY2.1 and
14. qDTY3.1 Enhances Yield under
15. Reproductive Stage Drought Stress.
16. Agriculture, 11, 64. https:// doi.org/
17. 10.3390/agriculture11010064
18. Dixit, S., Singh, A., Sandhu, N., Bhandari, A.,
19. Vikram P. and Kumar, A. 2017. Combining
20. drought and submergence tolerance in
21. rice: Marker-assisted breeding and QTL
22. combination effects. Molecular
23. Breeding, 37: 143.
24. Drew, M. and Lynchm J. 1980.Soil
25. Anaerobiosis, Microorganisms, and Root
26. Function. Annual Review of
27. Phytopathology. 18:37–66.
28. Hao Du., Fei Huang., Nai Wu., Xianghua Li.,
29. HonghongHu and Lizhong Xiong. 2018.
30. Integrative regulation of drought escape
31. through ABA-dependent and –
32. Independent Pathways in Rice.
33. Molecular Plant. 11 (4): 584-597.
34. DOI:https://doi.org/10. 1016/
35. j.Molp.2018.01.004.
36. IPCC 2014a. Contribution of Working Groups
37. I, II and III to the 5th Assessment Report
38. of the Intergovernmental Panel on
39. Climate Change. Climate Change
40. Synthesis Report. Geneva, Switzerland:
41. IPCC.
42. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)
43. (2002). Annual Report for 1975.
44. International Rice Research Institute, Los
45. Banos, Philippines Pp29.
46. Kumar, A., Verulkar, S.B., Dixit, S., Chauhan,
47. B., Bernier, J., Venuprasad, R., Zhao, D
48. and Shrivastava, M.N. 2009. Yield and
49. yield attributing traits of rice (Oryza
50. sativa L.) under lowland drought and
51. suitability of early vigor as a selection
52. criterion. Field Crops Research.114: 99–
53. 107.
54. Kumar A, Septiningshih E, Singh U S, Ismail A
55. M, Mackill D, Singh N K. 2016. From QTL
56. to variety-harnessing the benefits of
57. QTLs for drought, flood and salt
58. tolerance in mega rice varieties of India
59. through a multi-institutional network.
60. Plant Sci, 242: 278–287.
61. Michael Gomez, S and Rangasamy, P. 2002.
62. Correlation and path analysis of yield and physiological characters in drought
63. resistant rice (Oryza sativa L.).
64. International journal of Mendel.19(1-2):
65. 33-34.
66. Panda, D., Mishra, S.S and Behera P.K.
67. 2021. Drought tolerance in rice: focus on
68. recent mechanisms and approaches.
69. Rice Sciences. 28 (2):119–132.
70. doi: 10.1016/J.RSCI.2021.01.002.
71. Priya Gupta, Atul Pachauri, Deepak Gauraha,
72. Jitendra Kumar Sahu, Kavita Chandra,
73. Abhinav Sao and Varsha Bhagat. 2024.
74. Heterotic Analysis (OryzasativaL.) in
75. Drought Tolerant Rice Accessions.
76. Journal of Advances in Biology and
77. Biotechnology. 27 (3): 34-46.
78. Sandhu, N., Singh, A., Dixit, S., Cruz,
79. M.T.S., Maturan, P.C., Jain, R.K. and
80. Kumar, A. 2014. Identification and
81. mapping of stable QTL with main and
82. epistasis effect on rice grain yield under
83. upland drought stress. BMC
84. Genetics.15: 1.
85. Singh R, Singh Y, Xalaxo S, Verulkar S, Yadav
86. N, Singh S, Singh N, Prasad K S N,
87. Kondayya K, RamanaRao P V, Rani M
88. G, Anuradha T, Suraynarayana Y,
89. Sharma P C, Krishnamurthy S L, Sharma
90. S K, Dwivedi J L, Singh A K, Singh P K,
91. Nilanjay, Singh N K, Kumar R, Chetia S
92. K, Ahmad T, Rai M, Perraju P, Pande A,
93. Singh D N, Mandal N P, Reddy J N, Singh
94. O N, Katara J L, Marandi B, Swain P,
95. Sarkar R K, Singh D P, Mohapatra T,
96. Padmawathi G, Ram T, Kathiresan R M,
97. Paramsivam K, Nadarajan S, Thirumeni
98. S, Nagarajan M, Singh A K, Vikram P,
99. Kumar A, Septiningshih E, Singh U S,
100. Ismail A M, Mackill D, Singh N K. 2016.
101. From QTL to variety-harnessing the
102. benefits of QTLs for drought, flood and
103. salt tolerance in mega rice varieties of
104. India through a multi-institutional
105. network. Plant Science, 242: 278–287.
106. Turner, J.M. 1953. A study of heterosis in
107. upland cotton II Combining ability and
108. inbreeding effects. Agronomy Journal.
109. 43:487-490
110. Venuprasad, R., Dalid, C.O., Del Valle, M.,
111. Zhao, D., Espiritu, M., Sta Cruz, M.T.,
112. Amante, M., Kumar, A. and Atlin, G.N.
113. 2009. Identification and characterization
114. of large-effect quantitative trait loci for
115. grain yield under lowland drought stress
116. in rice using bulk-segregant analysis.
117. Theoretical Applied Genetics. 120: 177-
118. 190.
119. Vikram, P., Swamy, B.P.M., Dixit, S., Trinidad,
120. J., Cruz, M.T.S., Maturan, P.C., Amante,
121. M. and Kumar A. 2016. Linkages and
122. interactions analysis of major effect
123. drought grain yield QTLs in rice, PLoS
124. One, 11 (3), p. e0151532.
125. Yusuff Oladosu, MohdRafli, Y., Chukwu
126. Samuel, AroluFatai, Usman Magaji, Isiaka
127. Karim, Zarifth Shafika Kamarudin,
128. Isma’ila Muhammad, Kazeem Kolapo.
129. 2019. Drought Resistance in Rice from
130. Conventional to Molecular Breeding.
131. Internal Journal of Molecular Sciences.
132. 20(14): 3519 doi: 10.3390/
133. ijms20143519.
134. Zu, X., Lu, Y., Wang, Q., Chu, P., Miao, W.,
135. Wang, H., La, H. 2017. A new method for
136. evaluating the drought tolerance of
137. upland rice cultivars. The Crop Journal.
138. 5(6): 488-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/
139. j.ci.05.002.
140. Zhu, R., Wu F., Zhou, S., Hu, T., Huang, J and
141. Gao, Y. 2020. Cumulative effects of
142. drought-flood abrupt alternation on the
143. photosynthetic characteristics of rice.
144. Environmental Experimental Botany.
145. 169: 103901.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
