PROXIMATE AND CELLWALL COMPOSITION OF SUPER NAPIER GRASS (PENNISETUM PURPUREUM) HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES


73 / 159

Authors

  • A. KAVYA Department of Animal Nutrition, C. V. Sc, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, A.P-517502
  • G. NAGI REDDY Department of Animal Nutrition, C. V. Sc, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, A.P-517502

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.4.06

Keywords:

Cell – wall fractions, Growth stages, Proximate composition, Super Napier grass

Abstract

 The investigation was conducted to find out and compare the proximate composition of Super Napier grass harvested at different growth stages which were 45 days, 60 days and 75 days during the months of January and February, 2022. The plant samples were collected at fodder unit of LFC, CVSc, Tirupati. Then, the samples were dried and ground before being analyzed for proximate composition (Moisture, Ash, Crude protein, Crude fiber, Ether extract and Nitrogen free extract) and fibre fractions (Neutral detergent fibre, Acid detergent fibre, Hemicellulose, Cellulose and Acid detergent lignin). Results of the present study indicated that, increasing the cutting interval (i.e., advancing age of maturity) increased drymatter and nutrient yields significantly (P < 0.05). In terms of nutrient content, it also increased the per cent of crude fiber (23.5, 27.1 and 30.2), acid detergent fiber (39.22, 40.08 and 41.32), neutral detergent fiber (67.12, 71.01 and 73.84), Hemicellulose (27.9, 30.93 and 32.52), Cellulose (33.52, 35.7 and 37.11) and acid detergent lignin (5.12, 5.94 and 6.62) in the plant. However, per cent of crude protein (9.78, 8.32 and 7.05) and ash (11.92, 9.56 and 7.99) was markedly decreased as the cutting interval increased. Therefore, the Super Napier at 45 days age growth is the best for harvesting which provides high nutritive value of the animal feed

References

20th Livestock Census. 2019. All India Reports.

Department of Animal Husbandry and

Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal

Husbandry and Dairying, Government of

India. PP. 16.

AOAC. 2012. Official Methods of Analysis, (19

th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical

Chemists. Washington D.C.

Jagadeesh, C. H., Reddy, Y. R., NagaLakshmi,

D., Mahender, M., Kumari, N. N., Sridhar,

K and Devi, K, B. 2017. Effect of stage

of harvest on the yield, chemical

composition, invitro and in-sacco

digestibility of hybrid Napier (Pennisetum

purpureum) variety APB N 1. Indian

Journal of Animal Research.51:16-20.

Kebede, G., Feyissa, F., Assefa, G., Mengistu,

A., Minta, M and Tadesse, T. 2016.

Agronomic performance and nutritive

values of napier grass (Pennisetum

purpureum (L.)schumach) accessions in

the Central Highland of Ethiopia.

International Journal of Development and

Research.6: 17-26.

Kushwaha, M., Singh, M., Kumar, R., Tyagi, N.,

Soni, P.G., Choudhary, S and Makarana,

G. 2018. Yield and quality of multicut

fodder sorghum as affected by nutrient

levels and biofertilizer application. Indian

Journal of Animal Nutrition. 35: 82-89.

Lounglawan, P., Wassana, L. and Wisitiporn,

S. 2014. Effect of cutting interval and

cutting height on yield and chemical

composition of King Napier grass

(Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum

Americanum). APCBEE Procedia.8: 27

31.

SPSS. 2015. IBM SPSS statistics for windows,

version 23.0 Armonk, Ny: IBM

corporation.

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B and Lewis, B.

A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral

detergent fibre and non-starch

polysaccharides in relation to animal

nutrition. Journal of Dairy Sciences.74:

83-97.

Downloads

Submitted

26-06-2025

Published

26-06-2025

How to Cite

A. KAVYA, & G. NAGI REDDY. (2025). PROXIMATE AND CELLWALL COMPOSITION OF SUPER NAPIER GRASS (PENNISETUM PURPUREUM) HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 52(4), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2024.52.4.06