RICE PRODUCTION IN UTTAR PRADESH: GROWTH, INSTABILITY AND DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS
485 / 1594
Authors
-
PARVAT SINGH
Department of Economics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226007
Keywords:
Decomposition, Growth Rate, Instability Analysis, Rice, Uttar PradeshAbstract
The present study investigated the association between growth rate and instability regarding to the production, area and yield of rice in Uttar Pradesh. The data was extracted from the (Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DES), Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, (MoA, GoI), spanning from 1990-91 to 2021-22. The data has been segmented into four periods for analysis. The compound annual growth rate, Coppock’s and Cuddy-Della Valle Instability Index have been estimated for the four periods.The growth rate analysis showed the rice crops for the area (0.56%), production (1.30%) and productivity (1.4%) overall, respectively. The highlights of the overall instability measures result of the CDVI Index in rice were observed to be low under area (4.09%) and low (9.59%) instability in production, respectively. In terms of Coppock’s
performed measure of instability was registered to be low (38.42%) under area cultivation and medium (42.93%) in the production, respectively. The results from the decomposition analysis revealed that the yieldeffect contributed the highest in production observed during period II (155.56%), which shows that there is a negative in-area effect (-65.56%), and an interaction effect was observed (7.78%). The study suggests that production should be prioritized and improving productivity to reach the future demand for rice; it also indicates that there is further potential for the enhancing production of rice in Uttar Pradesh by the adoption of advanced inputs technology.
References
1. production: Empirical evidence from Uttar
2. Pradesh. The Journal of Research
3. ANGRAU, Vol. 50(3): 104–112. https://
4. epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/
5. view/133381
6. Chand, R and Raju, S.S. 2009. Instability in
7. Indian Agriculture during different phases
8. of technology and policy, Indian Journal
9. of
10. Agricultural Economics, Vol.
11. 64(2):187–207. DOI: 10.22004/
12. ag.econ.204625
13. REFERENCES
14. Ansari, S., Ansari, S. A and Rehmat, A. 2022.
15. Determinants of instability in rice
16. Devegowda, S. R. 2024. Temporal Insights:
17. Assessing the Growth Performance of
18. Rice in India. The Journal of Research
19. ANGRAU, Vol. 51(4):169-177. https://
20. doi.org/10.58537/jorangarau.
21. 2023.51.4.19
22. 125
23. GROWTH, INSTABILITY AND DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS IN RICE PRODUCTION
24. FAO. 2018. Rice Market Monitor, Food and
25. Agriculture Organization of the United
26. Nations. https://openknowledge.fao.org/
27. server/api/core/bitstreams/07b6c7b4
28. 065b-47ac-88d5-bbdafcb2baae/content
29. Jambhulkar, N. N., Mondal, B., Bisen, J and
30. Pradhan, A. K. 2023. Growth and
31. instability of rice production: A district
32. level analysis in West Bengal, India.
33. ORYZA-International Journal of Rice,
34. Vol. 60(3):487-494. https://doi.org/
35. 10.35709/ory.2023.60.3.13
36. MoA and FW, GoI, 2021-22. Directorate of
37. Economics and Statistics, Department of
38. Agriculture, co-operation and Farmers
39. Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and
40. Farmers Welfare, government of India.
41. Retrieved from the website (https://
42. data.desagri.gov.in/website/index.html)
43. on 20.04.2024
44. Nirmala, B., Neeraja, C. N., Waris, A., Rao, S.
45. D and Muthuraman, P. 2019. An
46. economic analysis of biofortified rice
47. varieties. ORYZA-International Journal of
48. Rice, Vol. 56(4): 412-417. https://
49. epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/OIJR/article/
50. view/96556/38423
51. Papademetriou, M. K. 2000. Rice production
52. in the Asia-Pacific region: issues and
53. perspectives. Bridging the rice yield gap
54. in the Asia-Pacific region, Vol. 220(1): 4
55. 25.https://www.fao.org/4/x6905e/
56. x6905e00.htm
57. Sidhu, R. S and Gill, S. S. 2006. Agricultural
58. credit and indebtedness in India: Some
59. issues. Indian Journal of Agricultural
60. Economics, Vol. 61(1):11-35 DOI:
61. 10.22004/ag.econ.204443
62. Singh, K. M., Ahmad, N., Pandey, V. V., Kumari,
63. T and Singh, R. 2021. Growth
64. performance and profitability of rice
65. production in India: an assertive analysis.
66. Economic Affairs, Vol. 66(3): 481-486.
67. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424
68. 2513.3.2021.18
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
