PERFORMANCE OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION WITH DIFFERENT TRANSPLANTING TIME, PLANT SPACING AND TRAINING SYSTEM


426 / 889

Authors

  • SHILPA KAUSHAL University Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Punjab 140 413
  • SHUBHAM University Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Punjab 140 413

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.1.02

Keywords:

Tomato, growth, nutrients, training system, polyhouse

Abstract

 Cultivation shift towards the cash crops becomes a major thrust area for generating higher  incomes but the approach requires scientific attention. Therefore, a study was conducted during  2021-22 and 2022-23 to access the effect of different transplantation time, spacing and training  system on soil nutrients status and growth of tomato. The results showed that early transplanting  on 15th March, with a spacing of 75 cm × 30 cm and training the plants to two shoots, led to the  highest fruit length and breadth, indicating a significant improvement in fruit development under  these conditions. Similar treatment combinations resulted in the highest values across various  yield parameters. These included fruits per cluster at 5.0, 4.6, and 4.5; fruits per plant at 26.8,  25.1, and 25.7; average fruit weight of 75.6 g, 71.5 g, and 79.9 g; and fruit yield per plant of 2.04 kg, 1.81 kg, and 1.75 kg. In another observation, similar treatments achieved fruits per cluster of 5.3, 5.0, and 5.0; fruits per plant of 32.0, 28.9, and 28.5; fruit weights of 76.8 g, 72.9 g, and 71.8  g; and fruit yields per plant of 2.22 kg, 1.91 kg, and 1.89 kg. Additionally, the maximum fruit yield  per 100 m² was registered with 1007.5 kg and 1100 kg, and thus, highlighting the effectiveness of  these treatment combinations in enhancing fruit productivity. However, plants spaced at 60 cm  ×30 cm attained maximum yield which was 10.6-14.4% higher over 75 cm ×30 cm. No significant difference was found on soil available nutrient content. Study identified the treatment combination  of early transplanting along with wider planting with 75 cm ×30 cm and two shoots training as an  eminent approach for growing tomato hybrids under poly house.

References

1. Abriham, A and Kefale, D. 2020. Effect of intra

2. row spacing on plant growth, yield and

3. quality of tomato

4. (Lycopersiconesculentum mill) varieties

5. at mizan-aman, southwestern Ethiopia.

6. International Journal of Agricultural

7. Extension8(1):33-42.

8. Ara, N., Bashar, M.K., Begum, S and Kakon,

9. S.S. 2007. Effect of spacing and stem

10. pruning on the growth and yield of

11. tomato. International Journal of

12. Sustainable Crop Production2: 35-39.

13. 18

14. PERFORMANCE OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION

15. Hossain, M., Ara, N., Islam, M.R., Hossain, J

16. and Akhter, B. 2013. Effect of different

17. sowing dates on yield of tomato

18. genotypes. International Journal of

19. Agricultural Research Innovation &

20. Technology4: 40-43.

21. Islam, Saha, M., Akand, S and Rahim, H. 2010.

22. Effect of sowing date on the growth and

23. yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum

24. L.). Agronomski Glasnik 1: 8-14

25. Shubham, Sharma, Uand Kaushal, R. 2023.

26. Effect of nitrification inhibitors on quality,

27. yield and economics of cauliflower cv.

28. PSB K1 in Typic Eutrochrept under mid

29. hills of North Western Himalayas. Journal

30. of Plant Nutrition 46 (17): 4096-4109

31. Shubham, Sharma, U and Kaushal, R.

32. 2022. Potential of Different Nitrification

33. Inhibitors on Growth of Late Sown

34. Cauliflower Var. Pusa Snowball K-1 and

35. Behavior of Soil NH4

36. + and NO3- in Typic

37. Eutrochrept Under Mid Hills of NW

38. Himalayas. Communications in Soil

39. Science and Plant Analysis 54

40. (10): 1368-1378, DOI: 10.1080/

41. 00103624. 2022.2146130

42. Subbiah, B. V and Asija G.L. 1956. Rapid

43. procedure for the estimation of the

44. available nitrogen in soils. Current

45. Science 25:259–60.

46. Ughade, S.R., Tumbare, A.D and Surve, U.S.

47. 2016. Response of tomato to different

48. fertigation levels and schedules under

49. polyhouse. International Journal of

50. Agricultural Sciences12 (1): 76-80.

51. Walkley, A and Black, T.A. 1934. An estimation

52. of soil organic matter and proposed

53. modification of the chromic acid titration

54. method. Soil Science 37 (1):29–38. doi:

55. 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.

Downloads

Published

26-06-2025

How to Cite

SHILPA KAUSHAL, & SHUBHAM. (2025). PERFORMANCE OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION WITH DIFFERENT TRANSPLANTING TIME, PLANT SPACING AND TRAINING SYSTEM. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.1.02