PERFORMANCE OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION WITH DIFFERENT TRANSPLANTING TIME, PLANT SPACING AND TRAINING SYSTEM
426 / 889
Keywords:
Tomato, growth, nutrients, training system, polyhouseAbstract
Cultivation shift towards the cash crops becomes a major thrust area for generating higher incomes but the approach requires scientific attention. Therefore, a study was conducted during 2021-22 and 2022-23 to access the effect of different transplantation time, spacing and training system on soil nutrients status and growth of tomato. The results showed that early transplanting on 15th March, with a spacing of 75 cm × 30 cm and training the plants to two shoots, led to the highest fruit length and breadth, indicating a significant improvement in fruit development under these conditions. Similar treatment combinations resulted in the highest values across various yield parameters. These included fruits per cluster at 5.0, 4.6, and 4.5; fruits per plant at 26.8, 25.1, and 25.7; average fruit weight of 75.6 g, 71.5 g, and 79.9 g; and fruit yield per plant of 2.04 kg, 1.81 kg, and 1.75 kg. In another observation, similar treatments achieved fruits per cluster of 5.3, 5.0, and 5.0; fruits per plant of 32.0, 28.9, and 28.5; fruit weights of 76.8 g, 72.9 g, and 71.8 g; and fruit yields per plant of 2.22 kg, 1.91 kg, and 1.89 kg. Additionally, the maximum fruit yield per 100 m² was registered with 1007.5 kg and 1100 kg, and thus, highlighting the effectiveness of these treatment combinations in enhancing fruit productivity. However, plants spaced at 60 cm ×30 cm attained maximum yield which was 10.6-14.4% higher over 75 cm ×30 cm. No significant difference was found on soil available nutrient content. Study identified the treatment combination of early transplanting along with wider planting with 75 cm ×30 cm and two shoots training as an eminent approach for growing tomato hybrids under poly house.
References
1. Abriham, A and Kefale, D. 2020. Effect of intra
2. row spacing on plant growth, yield and
3. quality of tomato
4. (Lycopersiconesculentum mill) varieties
5. at mizan-aman, southwestern Ethiopia.
6. International Journal of Agricultural
7. Extension8(1):33-42.
8. Ara, N., Bashar, M.K., Begum, S and Kakon,
9. S.S. 2007. Effect of spacing and stem
10. pruning on the growth and yield of
11. tomato. International Journal of
12. Sustainable Crop Production2: 35-39.
13. 18
14. PERFORMANCE OF TOMATO UNDER PROTECTED CULTIVATION
15. Hossain, M., Ara, N., Islam, M.R., Hossain, J
16. and Akhter, B. 2013. Effect of different
17. sowing dates on yield of tomato
18. genotypes. International Journal of
19. Agricultural Research Innovation &
20. Technology4: 40-43.
21. Islam, Saha, M., Akand, S and Rahim, H. 2010.
22. Effect of sowing date on the growth and
23. yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum
24. L.). Agronomski Glasnik 1: 8-14
25. Shubham, Sharma, Uand Kaushal, R. 2023.
26. Effect of nitrification inhibitors on quality,
27. yield and economics of cauliflower cv.
28. PSB K1 in Typic Eutrochrept under mid
29. hills of North Western Himalayas. Journal
30. of Plant Nutrition 46 (17): 4096-4109
31. Shubham, Sharma, U and Kaushal, R.
32. 2022. Potential of Different Nitrification
33. Inhibitors on Growth of Late Sown
34. Cauliflower Var. Pusa Snowball K-1 and
35. Behavior of Soil NH4
36. + and NO3- in Typic
37. Eutrochrept Under Mid Hills of NW
38. Himalayas. Communications in Soil
39. Science and Plant Analysis 54
40. (10): 1368-1378, DOI: 10.1080/
41. 00103624. 2022.2146130
42. Subbiah, B. V and Asija G.L. 1956. Rapid
43. procedure for the estimation of the
44. available nitrogen in soils. Current
45. Science 25:259–60.
46. Ughade, S.R., Tumbare, A.D and Surve, U.S.
47. 2016. Response of tomato to different
48. fertigation levels and schedules under
49. polyhouse. International Journal of
50. Agricultural Sciences12 (1): 76-80.
51. Walkley, A and Black, T.A. 1934. An estimation
52. of soil organic matter and proposed
53. modification of the chromic acid titration
54. method. Soil Science 37 (1):29–38. doi:
55. 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.