EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTION ON CHILD DIETARY DIVERSITY AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN RURAL ANGUL, ODISHA
310 / 263
Authors
-
ANWESA SAHOO
P.G. Department of Home Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur-768019, Odisha, India
-
DR. HARAPRIYA SAMANTARAYA
Keywords:
Anthropometric measurements, dietary diversity., nutrientintake, nutritional intervention, rural Odisha.Abstract
This study assessed the effectiveness of a three-month nutritional intervention on dietary diversity and nutritional status among 300 under-five children in rural Angul district, Odisha, covering the period between 2023-2024. The intervention led to a significant increase in dietary
diversity scores, from 45.0% to 55.0% for achieving a dietary diversity score (DDS) of 4 (p= 0.032), and notable improvements in nutrient intake: energy (+4.84%, p = 0.045), protein (+12.15%, p = 0.032), and vitamin C (+22.22%, p = 0.015). Anthropometric measurements also showed significant changes, with weight increasing by 6.67% (p = 0.038) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) improving by 7.88% (p = 0.046). Chi-square analysis revealed reductions in underweight (from 35.0% to 25.0%, ² = 8.00, p = 0.005), stunting (from 40.0% to 30.0%, 6.50, p = 0.010), and wasting (from 30.0% to 20.0%, ² = ² = 7.00, p = 0.008). Pearson correlations indicated a positive relationship between dietary diversity and weight (r = 0.45, p = 0.001), height (r = 0.30, p = 0.015), and MUAC (r = 0.40, p = 0.005). Multiple regression analysis identified significant predictors of improved nutritional status, particularly protein ( = 0.25, p < 0.001) and calcium intake ( = 0.20, p = 0.001). ANOVA confirmed significant differences in nutritional status improvement across groups (F = 6.75, p = 0.003). These findings highlight the intervention’s effectiveness in improving child health outcomes and support the implementation of similar programs in comparable settings.
References
1. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India
2. 2019–21, 2022. State Fact Sheet – Odisha.
3. Mumbai: IIPS. Retrieved from https://
4. rchiips.org/NFHS/
5. Jones, A. D., and Brown, K. H. 2018. Dietary
6. diversity and child nutritional outcomes:
7. Systematic review and evidence synthesis.
8. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 14(3),
9. e12508.https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12508
10. Jones, A. D., and Lee, S. M. 2020. Nutrition
11. focused interventions and their role in
12. preventing childhood undernutrition in low
13. income settings: A review of
14. evidence.Global food security, 25, 100345.
15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100345
16. Lee, S. E., and Thompson, J. M. D. 2020. Effects
17. of dietary interventions on nutrient intake
18. and status in early childhood: A systematic
19. review. Public Health Nutrition, 23(1), 1
20. 13.https://doi .org/10.1017/
21. S1368980019002809
22. Patel, R., and Kumar, A. 2021. Role of dietary
23. diversification on anthropometric outcomes
24. in under-five children: A community-based
25. assessment. Indian Journal of Community
26. Health, 33(2), 244–249.https://doi.org/
27. 10.47203/IJCH.2021.v33i02.006
28. Roberts, L., and Smith, J. 2019. Targeted
29. nutritional interventions and child health:
30. A comparative analysis across community
31. settings. Journal of Pediatric Health Care,
32. 33(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/
33. j.pedhc.2018.11.004
34. Ruel, M. T., and Alderman, H. 2019. Nutrition
35. sensitive interventions and programmes:
36. How can they help to accelerate progress
37. in improving maternal and child nutrition?
38. The Lancet, 382(9891), 536–551. https://
39. doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0
40. Sinha, D., and Das, P. 2020. Effectiveness of
41. nutritional education and food
42. supplementation on growth parameters of
43. preschool children. Journal of Nutrition and
44. Health Sciences, 7(1), 102–108.https://
45. doi.org/10.15744/2393-9060.7.102
46. Taylor, M., and Green, P. 2021. Context-specific
47. strategies for improving nutrition in under
48. five children: Evidence from intervention
49. based trials. Public Health Nutrition, 24(5),
50. 1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1017/
51. S1368980020003236
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
