PROFILE, KNOWLEDGE AND ADOPTION OF CRITICAL INTERVENTIONS OF MAJOR CROPS AMONG DRYLAND FARMERS IN PRAKASAM DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH


458 / 380

Authors

  • M. CHENNAMADHAVA Department of Agricultural Extension & Communication, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221055
  • P.L.R.J. PRAVEENA Department of Agricultural Extension & Communication, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221055
  • T. LAKSHMI
  • P. MAHESWARA REDDY

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.1.13

Keywords:

Credit orientation, Dryland, Information seeking behaviour,, Risk preference

Abstract

The current study was conducted to examine the profile, knowledge, and adoption of key interventions among dryland farmers in the Prakasam district of Andhra Pradesh in 2021.An ex post facto research design was used for the study, and a sample of 120 dryland farmers was selected.The results revealed that most farmers were middle-aged (43.33%) or older (45%), with  31.67% being illiterate or having only primary or high school education. Small-scale farmers (56.66%) dominated, and land holdings had decreased due to family divisions. While a majority  of farmers had medium (63.33%) to high (19.17%) farming experience, yields in redgram were low (37.5%) and medium in cotton (71.67%), primarily due to climatic challenges and limited irrigation. The majority (55%) had medium annual incomes, supplemented by livestock. Extension contact, media exposure, and information-seeking behaviors were generally medium, with farmers depending on local sources for advice, especially during droughts. Knowledge levels on farming interventions were predominantly medium to high, with 60% of farmers showing medium knowledge on redgram and 68.33% on cotton. Adoption rates were also moderate, with 63.33% adopting redgram interventions and 70% adopting cotton interventions to a medium extent. A significant correlation was found between farmers’ knowledge and adoption levels, with education playing a key role in both. Moreover, the study revealed a strong positive correlation between education and the adoption of improved farming practices for both crops. Key variables such as land holding, annual income, extension contact, and irrigation status were positively correlated with knowledge and adoption, while age and farming experience had negative correlations. The study emphasizes the need for targeted agricultural policies, enhanced extension services, and improved irrigation infrastructure to improve productivity and prevent rural-to-urban migration.

References

1. Bankey, B., Rajesh, K., Kamta, P and

2. Sundarambal, P. 2012. Role performance

3. and knowledge level of tribal women

4. farmers in Meghalaya. Indian Research

5. Journal of Extension Education. 12(1):

6. 60-62.

7. Commission on inclusive and sustainable

8. agricultural development of Andhra

9. Pradesh. 2016. Revitalizing rainfed

10. agriculture of Andhra Pradesh.

11. Devi, C.L. 2019. Marketing behaviour of women

12. agripreneurs in Kadapa district of Andhra

13. Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Acharya

14. N.G. Ranga Agricultural University.

15. Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

16. Dhepe, A.R. 2014. Knowledge and adoption of

17. improved black gram production

18. practices by the farmers. M.Sc. (Ag.)

19. T h e s i s .

20. VasantraoNaikMarathwadaKrishiVidyapeeth,

21. Parbhani.

22. FAO, 2000. Agriculture: towards 2015/30.

23. Technical Interim Report. Economic and

24. Social Dept., FAO, Rome.

25. FAO, 2020. Towards a global programme on

26. sustainable dryland agriculture. Food and

27. Agriculture Organization of the United

28. Nations, Rome.

29. IPCC, 2019. Climate Change and Land (special

30. report). Retrieved from (https://

31. www.ipcc.ch/srccl/).

32. Kandasamy, S. U. L., Singh, P. K. and Swain,

33. D. K. 2022. Determination of Factors

34. Affecting the Adoption of Integrated

35. Farming System in Dryland Areas of

36. Southern India by Using Supervised

37. Learning Techniques. Journal of Asian

38. and African Studies. 59(4): 1211-1230.

39. Kaur, R., Kumar, S and Jaidka, M. 2022.

40. Increasing crop productivity in dryland/

41. rainfed areas for achieving the

42. sustainability goal of zero hunger. Indian

43. Farming. 72 (07): 07-10.

44. Kumar, P.P. 2019. A study on the knowledge

45. and adoption of the recommended

46. production technologies by the redgram

47. growers of Prakasam district of Andhra

48. Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Acharya

49. N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,

50. Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

51. Meena, R.K. 2014. Knowledge and adoption

52. of pigeon pea production technology by

53. the farmers. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis.

54. VasantraoNaikMarathwadaKrishiVidyapeeth,

55. Parbhani.

56. Mukundarao, B., Suryamani, M and Ratnakar,

57. R. 2015. A study on extent of adoption of

58. Bt. cotton production technologies by the

59. Bt. cotton growers of Andhra Pradesh.

60. The Andhra Agricultural Journal. 62(1):

61. 211-218.

62. NABARD, 2021. Potential Linked Credit Plan

63. (Prakasam). National Bank for

64. Agriculture and Rural Development,

65. Andhra Pradesh Regional Office.

66. Naik, A., Sreenivasulu, M. Rao, I.S. and Devi,

67. K.B.S. 2015. Profile characteristics of

68. organic red gram farmers of dry land

69. areas of Karnataka. The Journal of

70. Research PJTSAU. 43 (3): 36 – 40.

71. Praveenbabu, R. 2014. A study on knowledge

72. and adoption level of paddy farmers in

73. East Godavari district of Andhra

74. Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Acharya

75. N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,

76. Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

77. Rai, D.P and Singh, B. 2010. Extent of

78. knowledge and constraints in cotton

79. production technology in Madhya

80. Pradesh. Indian Research Journal of

81. Extension Education. 10(2): 78-80.

82. Rao, Ch. S., Gopinath, K.A., Prasad, Y.G.,

83. Sikka, A.K and Singh, R. 2016. Climate

84. Resilient Rainfed Agriculture status and

85. strategies. Indian Farming. 66(2): 02–06.

86. Siddeswari, G.K. 2015. Impact of farmer field

87. schools on the rice farmers in Nellore

88. district of Andhra Pradesh. M.Sc. (Ag.)

89. Thesis. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural

90. University, Hyderabad, India.

91. Sumit, R.S and Rajesh, D.P. 2017. Association

92. between personal profile and extent of

93. adoption regarding paddy production

94. technology. Gujarat Journal of Extension

95. Education. 28(2): 321-324.

96. Thiyagarajan, M. 2011. Impact analysis of

97. system rice intensification (SRI) among

98. the paddy farmers of Coimbatore district.

99. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu

100. Agricultural University, Coimbatore.

101. Tidke, G.R., Rathod, M.K and Mandve, R.P.

102. 2012. Knowledge and adoption of

103. farmers about the management of pod

104. borer complex in pigeon pea.

105. International Journal of Extension

106. Education. 8: 71-75.

Downloads

Published

03-07-2025

How to Cite

M. CHENNAMADHAVA, & P.L.R.J. PRAVEENA. (2025). PROFILE, KNOWLEDGE AND ADOPTION OF CRITICAL INTERVENTIONS OF MAJOR CROPS AMONG DRYLAND FARMERS IN PRAKASAM DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (T. LAKSHMI & P. MAHESWARA REDDY, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(1), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.1.13