DEVELOPMENT OF MILLET-BASED RECIPES UTILISING POTATO STARCH, RICE FLOUR AND ARROWROOT POWDER AS THICKENING AGENTS


197 / 251

Authors

  • T. GAYATRI Department of Home Science St Joseph’s College for Women (Autonomous), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
  • VADAREVU SONY Department of Home Science St Joseph’s College for Women (Autonomous), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.2.08

Keywords:

Gluten free, Millets, Starches

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop value-added products from selected millets by  incorporating plant-based, gluten-free starches. Conducted in 2023 at St. Joseph’s College for Women, Visakhapatnam, the research focused on four millet varieties: Barnyard, Kodo, Little and Foxtail. Three plant-derived starches—potato starch, arrowroot powder and rice flour were used to enhance the functional and sensory properties of millet-based recipes. The developed products included Barnyard Cutlet, Kodo Steam Cake, Little Millet Soup and Foxtail Papad. Each product was prepared in three variations, using the different starches.Sensory evaluation was conducted using a 9-point hedonic scale. Among the Barnyard Cutlet variations, the rice flour version scored highest for aroma, while the arrowroot-based cutlet was rated best in appearance. Little Millet Soup received consistent ratings across all three starch variations for aroma, aftertaste, and overall acceptability. The Kodo Steam Cake prepared with potato starch received the lowest scores in most parameters, except for appearance, which was rated favourably.In addition to sensory analysis, a line spread test was conducted to assess the viscosity of the starches. The results showed that rice flour had the highest spread ability, indicating lower viscosity, while arrowroot powder showed the least spread, suggesting it is a stronger thickening agent. Moisture content was also analysed, as it plays a critical role in determining the structural and functional properties of food products. Based on loss-on-drying results, arrowroot powder exhibited the highest moisture content among the starches tested.

References

1. Aggarwal, M., Verma, P. and Sharma, D. 2018.

2. Preparation and sensory evaluation of

3. arrowroot masala khakhra. International

4. Journal of Fermented Foods, 7(2): 137

5. 142.

6. Ali, S.M., Siddique, Y., Mehnaz, S. and Sadiq,

7. M.B. 2023. Extraction and characteri

8. zation of starch from low-grade potatoes

9. and formulation of gluten-free cookies

10. containing modified potato starch.

11. Heliyon. 9(9): e19581. https://doi.org/

12. 10.1016/j.heliyon, 2023 .e19581.

13. Amante, P.R., Santos, E.C.Z., Correia, V.T.D.V.

14. and Fante, C.A. 2021. Benefits and

15. possible food applications of arrowroot

16. (Maranta arundinacea L.). Journal of

17. Culinary Science & Technology, 19(6):

18. 513–521. Bao H., Zhou J., Yu J. and Wang S. 2021. Effect

19. of Drying Methods on Properties of

20. Potato Flour and Noodles Made with

21. Potato Flour. Foods. 2021 May

22. 18;10(5):1115. doi: 10.3390/foods

23. 10051115. PMID: 34070076; PMCID:

24. PMC8158102.

25. Bhaduri, S. 2013. A comprehensive study on

26. physical properties of two gluten-free

27. flour fortified muffins. Journal of Food

28. Processing & Technology, 4(7): 1–4.

29. Katayama, K., Tokunaga, Y., Kobayashi, H.,

30. and Harada, H. 2023. Line Spread Test

31. Results for Commercially Available

32. Universal Design Foods. Acta Scientific

33. Medical Sciences. 7(9): 18–25. Available

34. at: https://actascientific.com/ASMS/pdf/

35. ASMS-07-1649.pdf

36. Kim, J.N. and Shin, W.S. 2009. Physical and

37. sensory properties of chiffon cake made

38. with rice flour. Korean Journal of Food

39. Science and Technology, 41(1): 69–76.

40. Lim, S. 2024. Sensory and nutritional

41. evaluation of nine types of millet

42. substituted Indian meal preparations.

43. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems,

44. 8, Article 1331260.

45. Makadi, A., Barapatre, P. and Desa, P. 2024.

46. Role of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum)

47. as preventive diet in lifestyle disorders.

48. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and

49. Health Sciences, 17(1): 043–048.

50. Malki, M.K.S., Wijesinghe, J.A.A.C., Ratnayake,

51. R.H.M.K. and Thilakarathna, G.C. 2023.

52. Characterization of arrowroot (Maranta

53. arundinacea) starch as a potential starch

54. source for the food industry. Heliyon.

55. 9(9): e20033. https://doi.org/10.1016/

56. j.heliyon, 2023.e20033.

57. Mouminah, H.H. and Althaiban, M.A. 2025.

58. Production and evaluation of gluten-free

59. cookies for celiac patients made from

60. rice flour and green banana flour.

61. Nutrition & Food Science, 13(2).

62. Onyango, S.O., Abong, G.O., Okoth, M.W.,

63. Kilalo, D. and Mwang’ombe, A.W. 2020.

64. Physico-chemical properties and

65. sensory quality of cassava-cowpea-millet

66. composite flours. African Crop Science

67. Journal, 28(1): 27–39.

68. Singh, A. and Iraj, S. 2023. To standardize and

69. develop the product using arrowroot.

70. International Journal of Home Science,

71. 9(2): 23-26.

72. Thapa, S. and Thapa, S. 2019. Scope of value

73. addition in potato. International Journal

74. of Horticulture Agriculture and Food

75. Science, 3(3): 132-146.

76. Verma, S., Srivastava, S. and Tiwari, N. 2015.

77. Comparative study on nutritional and

78. sensory quality of barnyard and foxtail

79. millet food products with traditional rice

80. products. Journal of Food Science and

81. Technology, 52(8): 5147–5155. https://

82. doi.org/10.1007/ s13197-014-1617-y.

83. Xu, F., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Liu, Q., Wang, F.,

84. Zhang, H., Hu, H. and Blecker, C. 2021.

85. Physicochemical and structural

86. characterization of potato starch with

87. different degrees of gelatinization.

88. Foods, 10(5): 1104. https://doi.org/

89. 10.3390/foods10051104.

Downloads

Published

15-10-2025

How to Cite

T. GAYATRI. (2025). DEVELOPMENT OF MILLET-BASED RECIPES UTILISING POTATO STARCH, RICE FLOUR AND ARROWROOT POWDER AS THICKENING AGENTS (VADAREVU SONY, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.2.08