CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SMALL AND LARGE SCALE PADDY FARMERS IN PALAKKAD DISTRICT, KERALA


146 / 105

Authors

  • SUMATHY M Department Of Economics, Government College Chittur(University of Calicut), Palakkad - 678104, Kerala.
  • SMITHA P Department Of Economics, Government College Chittur(University of Calicut), Palakkad - 678104, Kerala.
  • MANJU VARGHESE Department Of Economics, Government College Chittur(University of Calicut), Palakkad - 678104, Kerala.

https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.3..11

Keywords:

Adaptation, Exposure, Sensitivity, Vulnerability

Abstract

Palakkad has a total paddy area of 76503.68 hectare, of which the wet paddy area is
 76361.21 hectare and total dry paddy area of 142.47 hectare. Weather, pest, disease, drought,
 and flood are the common natural or external risks. The external sources of risk cannot be
 controlled by farmers, which generally come from the natural environment. In this context, the
 study looks into the production risks pertaining from the external sources among the small and
 large scale farmers in the Palakkad district, Kerala. A vulnerability index is developed consisting
 of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive factors to understand the climate induced production risks
 among the selected sample farmers during 2005 to 2022.The data reveals that the exposure
 index is low (<= 11.96) for only minority of small farmers and most of themfell in high and very
 high category (more than 13.46). In the sensitivity category, majority of small and large farmers
 wereincluded in the high sensitivity index category group (11.45to 13.66).But the severities of
 these factors effecting them are different. Exposure factors had medium impact on large number
 of sample farmers, while, sensitivity factors create high impact on large number of farmers.
 Likewise, adaptive factors had high impact on small and large scale farmers. Even though
 adaptation practices are implemented in the district,more efforts were needed to implement them
 in a timely and systematic way.

References

Agricultural Statistics.2021-22. Directorate of

Economics and Statistics, Ministry of

Agriculture, Government of Kerala.

Agricultural Statistics.2022-23.Directorate of

Economics and Statistics, Ministry of

Agriculture, Government of Kerala.

Amer Ait Sidhoum. 2023. Measuring farm

productivity under production

uncertainty. Agricultural and resource

economics, 672-687.

Acosta-Moreno, R. 1997. Interview with S.

Agrawala, Bonn, Germany, March 4.

Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E.and Watts, M.

J. 1994. Climate change and social

vulnerability:-Toward a sociology and

geography of food insecurity. Global

Environmental Change, 4(1): 37–48.

Chavas, 2008.Stochastic Specification of

Production Functions and Economics

Implications.Journal of Econometrics, 7:

67- 86.

Denton, F. 2002. Climate change vulnerability,

impacts, and adaptation: Why does

gender matter? Gender and

Development, 10(2): 10-20.

McNeeley, S. M., Even, T. L., Gioia,J. B. M.,

Knapp, C. N.and Beeton, T. A. 2017.

Expanding vulnerability assessment for

public lands: The social complement to

ecological approaches. Climate Risk

Management,16:106–119.

Riaman, R.; Sukono, S.; Supian, S. and Ismail,

N. 2021.Analysing the decision making

for agricultural risk assessment:An

application of extreme value theory.

Decis. Sci. Lett., 10: 351–360.

Riaman, R., Sukono, S., Supian, S. and Ismail,

N. 2021.Determining the premium of

paddy insurance using the extreme value

theory method and the operational value

at risk approach.Journal of Physics:

Conference Series, 1722(1) 012059.

Scott, C.A.and M.F. Walter, E.S. 1996. Impacts

of historical changes in land use and

dairy herds in water quality in the

Catskills Mountains. Journal of

Environmental Quality, 27:410-1417.

Downloads

Submitted

23-11-2025

Published

13-05-2026

How to Cite

SUMATHY M. (2026). CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF SMALL AND LARGE SCALE PADDY FARMERS IN PALAKKAD DISTRICT, KERALA (SMITHA P & MANJU VARGHESE, Trans.). The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 53(3), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.58537/jorangrau.2025.53.3..11