DEALERS PERSPECTIVES ON NANO FERTILIZERS AND THEIR ROLE IN PRODUCT POSITIONING
215 / 318
Keywords:
Cost effective, Nano Fertilizers, perception, promotionAbstract
This study explores dealers’ perceptions about nano fertilizers in Guntur district, Andhra
Pradesh. The study was conducted in 2024. The study employed a sample of 35 dealers and
percentage analysis, mean scores and chi square technique were employed to analyse the data.
The findings revealed that dealers perceived nano fertilizers as cost-effective and efficient. These
were viewed as having high ease of use owing to their effective storage, dissolution and application
characteristics. Dealers, as first point of contact, shape farmers input choices, thereby making
their perceptions as proxy for positioning and perceived effectiveness of nano fertilizer.
Recommendations from agricultural departments and fellow farmers identified as crucial for
adoption among farmers and promotions by company representatives and media influence were
found less impactful. The chi-square analysis highlighted that dealers prioritized affordability for
lower customer footfall (fewer than five customers), while ease of use was emphasized for higher
footfall (more than five customers). The demand for nano fertilizers is expected to grow, with
adoption likely to increase due to their ease of use and reduced perceived risks through farmer
education. Enhancing product benefits and implementing focused media promotions could further
accelerate adoption among farmers.
References
1. Food and Agriculture Organization. 2021. Soil
2. pollution: A hidden reality, FAO, Rome
3. Iqbal, S., Sutharsan, S and Thenuja, M. 2024.
4. A study on the adaptability of farmers to
5. n-nano fertilizer usage in Oryza Sativa
6. L. cultivation in selected divisional
7. secretariat divisions of Ampara district of
8. Sri Lanka. International Journal of
9. Botany Studies, 9(1): 8-14.
10. Kumar, S., Roy, S., Atal, R., Panda, C. K and
11. Sohane, R. K. 2020. Knowledge gap of
12. agri-input dealers in farm
13. production. Current Journal of Applied
14. Science and Technology, 39(4): 92-101.
15. Kumar, Y. 2021. Sales promotion and
16. marketing strategy of Nano urea (liquid).
17. Indian Journal of Fertilisers, 17(9): 882
18. 891.
19. Ganiger S. 2012. Knowledge perception and
20. role performance of input dealers in agro
21. advisory services in northern dry zone
22. of Karnataka. Ph. D. Thesis. Acharya
23. N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,
24. Guntur.
25. Mahapatra, D. M., Satapathy, K. C and Panda,
26. B.2022. Biofertilizers and nanofertilizers
27. for sustainable agriculture:
28. Phycoprospects and challenges. Science
29. of The Total Environment, 803: 149990
30. Pingali, P. 2012. Green revolution: Impacts,
31. limits and the path ahead. Proceedings
32. of the National Academy of Sciences,109
33. (31):12302–12308
34. Raliya, R., Saharan, V., Dimkpa, C and Biswas,
35. P. (2018). Nanofertilizer for precision and
36. sustainable agriculture: Current state
37. and future perspectives. Journal of
38. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66(26):
39. 6487–6503.
40. Vishakha, K., Deepa, N., Rohini, A.,
41. Vidhyavathi, A and Ravikumar, R. 2023.
42. Awareness and Perception of Farmers
43. and Dealers on Nano Urea in Gondia
44. District of Maharashtra, India.
45. International Journal of Environment and
46. Climate Change, 13(10): 981-991.
47. Waghmode, Y., Borate, H.V and Gulkari, K.D.
48. 2014. Training needs of agricultural input
49. dealers in transfer of technology.
50. Gujarat Journal of Extension Education,
51. 25(1): 543-546
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.